Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I'll go out on a limb and say Monte will say front anyway I would replace the front first if it were my car. but what do I know

---

Just curious why fronts? What is your thinking behind this. If it spins at the hit on greasy track what would fronts help?

---

because the 90/10s are going slam open bottom out and fall back down and unload the tires. maybe In am wrong, a little tire spin may not hurt him that much. he still has adjustment on the rear.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I'll go out on a limb and say Monte will say front anyway I would replace the front first if it were my car. but what do I know

---

Just curious why fronts? What is your thinking behind this. If it spins at the hit on greasy track what would fronts help?

---

because the 90/10s are going slam open bottom out and fall back down and unload the tires. maybe In am wrong, a little tire spin may not hurt him that much. he still has adjustment on the rear.

---

My reasoning is once the 90/10 extends it stays extended. I would want a shock that settles shortly after initial launch

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I'll go out on a limb and say Monte will say front anyway I would replace the front first if it were my car. but what do I know

---

Just curious why fronts? What is your thinking behind this. If it spins at the hit on greasy track what would fronts help?

---

because the 90/10s are going slam open bottom out and fall back down and unload the tires. maybe In am wrong, a little tire spin may not hurt him that much. he still has adjustment on the rear.

---

My reasoning is once the 90/10 extends it stays extended. I would want a shock that settles shortly after initial launch

---

I like that reason better. But I would tie it down more and do rears.

---

Quote:

---

I like that reason better. But I would tie it down more and do rears.

---

Exactly what one of my 4 second fast friends said to do

---

Didnt you say you have poly bushings in the front..
they can cause issues if they bind up.. how much travel
do you have

---

I ment huge poly bump stops. If i said bushings, i mispoke. I also just asked a simple question and also said my car makes it down the track nearly every time with 6 year old radials although i do realize my 60 is only 1.41-42

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I like that reason better. But I would tie it down more and do rears.

---

Exactly what one of my 4 second fast friends said to do

---

Didnt you say you have poly bushings in the front..
they can cause issues if they bind up.. how much travel
do you have

---

I ment huge poly bump stops. If i said bushings, i mispoke. I also just asked a simple question and also said my car makes it down the track nearly every time with 6 year old radials although i do realize my 60 is only 1.41-42

---

Ok

Quote:

---

I DON'T like 3 ways on the front of anything.........I don't care how good guys think they work. If the front doesn't work, the rear never will...........so that is my answer.........FRONTS

Monte

---

BAM

Quote:

---

I have the same dilemma. I have Rancho 9 ways on the back and the Caltrac 90/10 on the front. My D50 will hook on the hit pull the wheels then spin badly. When it was hooking it would carry the tires about 45-50 ft. then the front would come down hard and unload the rears.
I am thinking about putting the stock front shocks back on it.
This is a picture of the landing.

---

in your case you need to replace both front and back.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I DON'T like 3 ways on the front of anything.........I don't care how good guys think they work. If the front doesn't work, the rear never will...........so that is my answer.........FRONTS

Monte

---

BAM

---

Quote:

---

I have the same dilemma. I have Rancho 9 ways on the back and the Caltrac 90/10 on the front. My D50 will hook on the hit pull the wheels then spin badly. When it was hooking it would carry the tires about 45-50 ft. then the front would come down hard and unload the rears.
I am thinking about putting the stock front shocks back on it.
This is a picture of the landing.

---

Quote:

---

I have the same dilemma. I have Rancho 9 ways on the back and the Caltrac 90/10 on the front. My D50 will hook on the hit pull the wheels then spin badly. When it was hooking it would carry the tires about 45-50 ft. then the front would come down hard and unload the rears.
I am thinking about putting the stock front shocks back on it.
This is a picture of the landing.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I DON'T like 3 ways on the front of anything.........I don't care how good guys think they work. If the front doesn't work, the rear never will...........so that is my answer.........FRONTS

Monte

---

BAM

---

Quote:

---

I DON'T like 3 ways on the front of anything.........I don't care how good guys think they work. If the front doesn't work, the rear never will...........so that is my answer.........FRONTS

Monte

---

On. Chad's car, what is the range of front end travel? I'm sure this changes but what is min and max you use on that car? Same Q for your dusty GTX when it was mopar powered

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I DON'T like 3 ways on the front of anything.........I don't care how good guys think they work. If the front doesn't work, the rear never will...........so that is my answer.........FRONTS

Monte

---

BAM

---

Nothing warms my heart more than quicktree and Monte agreeing on something during the winter, then again they both live in the south

---

I agree with Monte on 99.9% of everything. only thing I have never been able to convince him of is pinion angle. but im still working on that and by the way he is way more smarter than I am.