|
Re: 572 Wedge, 440-1 345CNC Bracket Engine. Dyno Results
[Re: Chuck@Best_Machine]
#1674547
09/20/14 07:38 PM
09/20/14 07:38 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,770
Pa
Wv68charger
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,770
Pa
|
Quote:
Big tube headers graph
Definitely gotta look into a set of those.... 
|
|
|
Re: 572 Wedge, 440-1 345CNC Bracket Engine. Dyno Results
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1674550
09/20/14 08:46 PM
09/20/14 08:46 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,770
Pa
Wv68charger
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,770
Pa
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Big tube headers graph
Definitely gotta look into a set of those....
What works on the dyno may not be the best for the track  The motor did not reach peak on HP on either pull it looks like to me  The torque graph does look a little flatter with the bigger pipes It would be a very good test at the track to find out which set makes the car go quicker and faster  
True Cab, the small headers have to stay for right now Chuck and Pete made sure I spent my money on what was absolutely needed to get the results for what we wanted to do within my budget. The only thing I know is it idled like a dream, sounded like a beast and made exactly what they said it would. Testing will have to wait till next year as the car is still in the chassis shop.
|
|
|
Re: 572 Wedge, 440-1 345CNC Bracket Engine. Dyno Results
[Re: Dunnuck Racing]
#1674552
09/20/14 09:32 PM
09/20/14 09:32 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,129
Cleveland
sunroofgtx
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,129
Cleveland
|
That Charger is going to Rock and Roll !! Great work !!
Join the quickest team in motorsports. Team FireCore. CustomWiresets.com
|
|
|
Re: 572 Wedge, 440-1 345CNC Bracket Engine. Dyno Results
[Re: sunroofgtx]
#1674553
09/20/14 09:47 PM
09/20/14 09:47 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,770
Pa
Wv68charger
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,770
Pa
|
Quote:
That Charger is going to Rock and Roll !! Great work !!
 we have no expectations of any ET just want to get back to racing it's hard to believe it's been 2 years but it will be worth the wait for sure!
|
|
|
Re: 572 Wedge, 440-1 345CNC Bracket Engine. Dyno Results
[Re: Dunnuck Racing]
#1674554
09/20/14 10:00 PM
09/20/14 10:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 970
Farmington Hills, Mich
Chuck@Best_Machine
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 970
Farmington Hills, Mich
|
Quote:
The big tubes lost quite a bit of torque for a few horsepower gain. I would say the smaller tubes are a better choice
Keith
I agree, with the big tires the small tubes will work good. If it was on 10.5 s I would use the big ones
|
|
|
Re: 572 Wedge, 440-1 345CNC Bracket Engine. Dyno Results
[Re: Chuck@Best_Machine]
#1674558
09/21/14 01:14 AM
09/21/14 01:14 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,847
MI, usa
dvw
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,847
MI, usa
|
Quote:
TTI Headers 2.125 x 3.5
I know it wasn't tested here, but you have had previous experience with the Indy cross ram. Whats your guess if this motor were equipped with the Indy cross ram as far as peak torque and overall power numbers?
|
|
|
Re: 572 Wedge, 440-1 345CNC Bracket Engine. Dyno Results
[Re: Dunnuck Racing]
#1674560
09/21/14 10:48 AM
09/21/14 10:48 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
|
Quote:
BMBBR5 Roller Cam 283 on a 115
Can you give us a little more info on that cam?
LSA 115 (wider than I expected)
Intake/Exhaust at 0.050" 283?
Lift with the 1.6 ratio?
I bought your BMBB 3R from another racer for my 540 CID, 345CNC.
Quote:
The big tubes lost quite a bit of torque for a few horsepower gain. I would say the smaller tubes are a better choice
Keith
I liked the straight 2.125" headers. They made more torque and the horsepower pulled to the top of the pull (7400rpm). That surprised me with 572 CID. Perhaps the cam and 3X intake?
|
|
|
Re: 572 Wedge, 440-1 345CNC Bracket Engine. Dyno Results
[Re: 440Jim]
#1674561
09/21/14 12:54 PM
09/21/14 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 877
ky
68roadrunner
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 877
ky
|
Quote:
Quote:
BMBBR5 Roller Cam 283 on a 115
Can you give us a little more info on that cam?
LSA 115 (wider than I expected)
Intake/Exhaust at 0.050" 283?
Lift with the 1.6 ratio?
I bought your BMBB 3R from another racer for my 540 CID, 345CNC.
Quote:
The big tubes lost quite a bit of torque for a few horsepower gain. I would say the smaller tubes are a better choice
Keith
I liked the straight 2.125" headers. They made more torque and the horsepower pulled to the top of the pull (7400rpm). That surprised me with 572 CID. Perhaps the cam and 3X intake?
3x intake and a 2" spacer, thats alot of plenum
|
|
|
|
|
I use safety wire on mine now.Dave 
