Re: Are COMP cams junk?
[Re: Mebsuta]
#1662489
08/23/14 09:39 PM
08/23/14 09:39 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259 Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
|
Will a stock 383 really go down the street any faster with an Xtreme cam instead of the vintage pattern? I need to know before I pull mine out.
68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
|
|
|
Re: Are COMP cams junk?
[Re: Commando1]
#1662495
08/24/14 01:50 PM
08/24/14 01:50 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 137 midwest - USA
69/70 Plymies
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 137
midwest - USA
|
Quote:
Life used to be so simple. You called Iskendarian and talked to Ed...
Commando1, that's a great statement. Where did the good ol' days go! By the way, where did Ed go?
|
|
|
Re: Are COMP cams junk?
[Re: jlatessa]
#1662500
08/24/14 03:05 PM
08/24/14 03:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,344 Central TX
roe
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,344
Central TX
|
I don't know if they're junk, I've always heard pretty good things about them on here. I did just read an interesting article in the July issue of MM. They used a short duration, fast lobe/high lift hydraulic roller and were able to get the best of both worlds when it comes to cam qualities. It gave them the smooth (sleeper) idle with high vacuum and still provided the same power as a long duration, choppy idle, low vacuum flat tappet. It was a really informative read for me seeing as I don't know jack diddly about cams so I feel like I learned something.
roe
1971 Plymouth Satellite 408/904 8 3/4 3.23 SG
|
|
|
Re: Are COMP cams junk?
[Re: roe]
#1662502
08/24/14 06:40 PM
08/24/14 06:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,902 Athens, Greece
Pyper70
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,902
Athens, Greece
|
About 7-8 yrs back when I bought my XR-280 Comp...my speed shop guy warned me against Hydraulic cams because the factory was using less nickel in the foundry process. Premature wear and failure. He said the only cams (at the time) still worth purchasing were Roller cams. I had bought it for my 505 but I am not anywhere close to building it. I bought the X-treme Energy Roller and matching lifters. I imagine with the EPA being the way it is, my model bumpstick is better than the same model on the shelf today
Family owned 1969 Charger R/T DualQuad 440/727/GVO/3.55s
|
|
|
Re: Are COMP cams junk?
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1662505
08/24/14 10:03 PM
08/24/14 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,336 Ball Ground, Georgia
Dixie
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,336
Ball Ground, Georgia
|
I just got a Comp cam for my car. Hope it holds up! The Mr. Sixpak cam didn't.
Last edited by Dixie; 08/24/14 10:04 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Are COMP cams junk?
[Re: ahy]
#1662508
08/25/14 01:49 AM
08/25/14 01:49 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,568 Omaha, Nebraska
Scott Carl
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,568
Omaha, Nebraska
|
I need to quit reading these "cam horror story" posts until I break mine in I have the XE256H-10 for my 318 build. I bought it too long ago and due to life getting in the way still haven't fired it up. Is there any recourse for a failed cam after the warranty period has passed even if it hasn't been run? I understand that most of the cam failures are the more radical grinds than mine. True?(Its supposed to be what would be like stock for a 340 or 360(?)) Scott
|
|
|
|
|