Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? #1631585
06/10/14 02:12 PM
06/10/14 02:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
B
buconine Offline OP
enthusiast
buconine  Offline OP
enthusiast
B

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
Wanting to do a lower budget father/son project. I was looking at the dakota r/t but really would like a manual trans. I know the swap can be done but it wouldn't be in the initial budget. How is the 4.7 performance wise? Seems like the 2wd manual 4.7 is a bit easier to find but doesn't seem to have the performance upgrade options of the 5.9. All this is pending our local scca club ok'ing a truck to compete. Use to autox an 87 dakota back in the day but rules have gotten tighter in the years sense. Thanks for your input.

8171664-dak.jpg (65 downloads)
Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: buconine] #1631586
06/10/14 04:56 PM
06/10/14 04:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,375
SoCal
MuuMuu101 Offline
I got lucky at Woodward!
MuuMuu101  Offline
I got lucky at Woodward!

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,375
SoCal
I believe amxautox used to autox his Dakota SS/T back in the day. He may be able to throw some pointers out to you.

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: MuuMuu101] #1631587
06/10/14 05:00 PM
06/10/14 05:00 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 96,662
On The Boat, On The Lake, Wa. ...
amxautox Offline
Still Retired. Still Posting on Moparts. A Lot.
amxautox  Offline
Still Retired. Still Posting on Moparts. A Lot.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 96,662
On The Boat, On The Lake, Wa. ...
1500 half ton full sized pickuptruck SS/T.


Tom

"Everyone should believe in something; I believe I'll go fishing."

-Henry David Thoreau

Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths

author unknown

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: buconine] #1631588
06/10/14 05:16 PM
06/10/14 05:16 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Dan@Hotchkis Offline
super stock
Dan@Hotchkis  Offline
super stock

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Being a former Datoka guy, Stock vs Stock, the 5 Speed 4.7's could beat the 5.9's with autos, all other things being equal. Get yourself an HO motor or do teh HO cam and intake swap on a non-HO 4.7, and then you'll have fun. My 2001 4.7 with 2003 Jeep HO Cams and Intake was good for 14.9's in the quarter with 33" BFG MT's. BUT... If you have a few extra bucks to spend on the 5.9, you've got as much power potential as your wallet can handle. Also, the 5.9 has a lot ore support than the 4.7. Everyone I know with big power and a 4.7 has boost or spray. Best of luck!

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: Dan@Hotchkis] #1631589
06/10/14 09:46 PM
06/10/14 09:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
B
buconine Offline OP
enthusiast
buconine  Offline OP
enthusiast
B

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
i was hoping to keep the truck in esp if possible. I don't think i'd have a chance in a mod class. Found a 5spd swapped r/t on the east coast i'm waiting to hear back on. If that pans out, all i'd need is to try and find one of your TVS kits and go racing. thanks for the input!

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: buconine] #1631590
06/11/14 12:09 AM
06/11/14 12:09 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 699
Cooperstown, NY
jrlegacy23 Offline
mopar
jrlegacy23  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 699
Cooperstown, NY
I had bought a 2002 2wd Dakota, club cab with a 4.7, 5 speed, 3.55 gears and stock chrome R/T wheels. My friend bought the same truck, but a Dakota R/T with a 360, auto, and 3.92 gears. They were pretty close 0-100mph, but I would take him a half car or so about every time. I really liked the 4.7 manual much better. We swapped trucks and he came away liking the "snottiness" of the 4.7 better also.


[color:"#00FF00"]68 Fastback Barracuda with some stuff[/color]

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: jrlegacy23] #1631591
06/11/14 12:11 AM
06/11/14 12:11 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
Jim_Lusk Offline
I Live Here
Jim_Lusk  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
For what it's worth, I've got a '99 5.2 for sale and I can't count the number of guys who have called looking for a good 4.7. Performance is great with the little motor, but they are more expensive to build and harder to find parts for. I'd go 5.9.

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: buconine] #1631592
06/11/14 05:41 AM
06/11/14 05:41 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,310
Walnut Creek, CA
blown340 Offline
master
blown340  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,310
Walnut Creek, CA
I bought my 2000 4.7L 5-speed regular cab dakota new and have autocrossed it roughly 100 times. With a full hotchkis suspension on it, it works great. The 4.7L with a manual is faster than a stock 5.9L in a straight line everytime and because it is so much lighter it handles much better as well. With that said, there are far more options for modifying the 5.9L for more power than there are for the 4.7L. The 4.7L with light mods makes as much power as you need for autoX type stuff, but it will fall behind a heavily modified 5.9L on higher speed stuff. I eventually swapped my 4.7L for a 8.3L V10 from a SRT10 in a never ending project, but you won't regreat choosing the 4.7L unless you really need crazy power.

-Jon

8172623-autoxdakm.jpg (49 downloads)

70 challenger convertible. 340/5 speed. blown, intercooled, efi, blah blah blah 71 valiant scamp 318/A833OD/AC/PS 00 dakota RC 4.7L 5 spd autoX'r. SRT10/T56 swap in process 73 W200 Power wagon, PTO winch, 4 spd
Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: blown340] #1631593
06/12/14 01:10 AM
06/12/14 01:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
B
buconine Offline OP
enthusiast
buconine  Offline OP
enthusiast
B

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
That v10 should be a handful in a little truck, i thought the hemi swap was nuts...

Were the camshafts the only difference between ho and non-ho engines? With as many head gasket issues as i've been seeing online, i figured if ho heads are better might be worth the preventative maint to swap heads while doing cams/intake/exhaust.

Really stinks that the dakota aftermarket is so small. No new ho cams, no hotchkis suspension kits. Looks like watching forums and scrounging salvage yards might be the only option to get parts. Thanks!

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: buconine] #1631594
06/12/14 01:21 AM
06/12/14 01:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
72Swinger Offline
master
72Swinger  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
If you find an HO engine, just pull it and use the whole thing. I dont think the heads are special but the cams,intake,pistons and rods are IIRC. The HO's were built for more abuse and RPM. I have an 08 Dakota with the 302hp 4.7, and it does scoot even with 3.55 gears,4 doors and 4wd.


Mopar to the bone!!!
Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: 72Swinger] #1631595
06/12/14 09:40 PM
06/12/14 09:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
B
buconine Offline OP
enthusiast
buconine  Offline OP
enthusiast
B

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
Did a little digging, the cost to do the ho swap is comparable with sticking a hemi in it. Think i will just try and find a truck and do suspension first and worry about more power later. Can't believe it is harder to find a 4.7 rc stick than a dakota r/t in the midwest. Good thing i'm in no hurry. Thanks for the advise!

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: buconine] #1631596
06/15/14 09:14 AM
06/15/14 09:14 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383 Offline
Too Many Posts
70Cuda383  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
my vote, start with a 5.2 5-spd truck, 97 through 99 would be good years to look for.

that's what my truck started as, reg cab, 5.2, 2wd, 5-spd. with SCT tune, 220/230 cam, 2bbl M1, and some cheap edelbrock mid-length headers, the truck was running mid 14s at 95 mph and with a Hotchkis suspension it would surprise a lot of people in the corners. too bad hotchkis won't make the parts anymore and you have to shop for them used on the dakota forums, When we approached Hotchkis and asked 'how many sets do we need to sell to get you to do another run of your springs/shocks for Dakotas?' their response was "we aren't going to do another run"


but starting with a 5.2 truck, a 5.9 swap is a drop in deal, and as long as you don't use sticky tires, the NV3500 will last awhile behind it, and you can save up $4500 or so to do a Viper T56 swap:

http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27998


Once you have the viper T56, you're free to build up whatever motor you want

408 stroker, throw spray, boost, big heads/cam at it, no worries. you won't break the T56 till north of 800hp/torque, and the stock 9.25" axle has proven to be stout enough to live behind 600+ hp builds on trucks running deep into the 10s.


**Photobucket sucks**
Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: 70Cuda383] #1631597
06/15/14 01:26 PM
06/15/14 01:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,375
SoCal
MuuMuu101 Offline
I got lucky at Woodward!
MuuMuu101  Offline
I got lucky at Woodward!

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,375
SoCal
Quote:

my vote, start with a 5.2 5-spd truck, 97 through 99 would be good years to look for.

that's what my truck started as, reg cab, 5.2, 2wd, 5-spd. with SCT tune, 220/230 cam, 2bbl M1, and some cheap edelbrock mid-length headers, the truck was running mid 14s at 95 mph and with a Hotchkis suspension it would surprise a lot of people in the corners. too bad hotchkis won't make the parts anymore and you have to shop for them used on the dakota forums, When we approached Hotchkis and asked 'how many sets do we need to sell to get you to do another run of your springs/shocks for Dakotas?' their response was "we aren't going to do another run"


but starting with a 5.2 truck, a 5.9 swap is a drop in deal, and as long as you don't use sticky tires, the NV3500 will last awhile behind it, and you can save up $4500 or so to do a Viper T56 swap:

http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27998


Once you have the viper T56, you're free to build up whatever motor you want

408 stroker, throw spray, boost, big heads/cam at it, no worries. you won't break the T56 till north of 800hp/torque, and the stock 9.25" axle has proven to be stout enough to live behind 600+ hp builds on trucks running deep into the 10s.




See, I would like a truck I could do something like this with (especially this year Dakota) as a 2-in-1 daily driver/parts hauler but Smog Regulations in CA suck and make modifying these cars a pain.

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: MuuMuu101] #1631598
06/16/14 12:11 AM
06/16/14 12:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383 Offline
Too Many Posts
70Cuda383  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
Smog is easy with these OBD-II Vehicles. I know a bunch of guys in California with 408 strokers making good power that still pass emissions. You can tweak the tune via SCT and retain all your original smog equipment and not get any check engine lights. The only code popping on mine is P0351 for 'primary coil resistance' because I have an MSD box running my coil. The MSD is taking its signal from the original coil pos/neg wires but it has almost no resistance so the computer thinks the coil is bad, even though the engine is running fine

And that's a 'soft code' meaning it will NEVER trigger a CEL.

all you would have to do is pick a cam with minimal overlap so that you still pass a sniffer test.


**Photobucket sucks**
Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: 70Cuda383] #1631599
06/16/14 12:34 AM
06/16/14 12:34 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,310
Walnut Creek, CA
blown340 Offline
master
blown340  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,310
Walnut Creek, CA
Quote:

my vote, start with a 5.2 5-spd truck, 97 through 99 would be good years to look for.

that's what my truck started as, reg cab, 5.2, 2wd, 5-spd. with SCT tune, 220/230 cam, 2bbl M1, and some cheap edelbrock mid-length headers, the truck was running mid 14s at 95 mph and with a Hotchkis suspension it would surprise a lot of people in the corners. too bad hotchkis won't make the parts anymore and you have to shop for them used on the dakota forums, When we approached Hotchkis and asked 'how many sets do we need to sell to get you to do another run of your springs/shocks for Dakotas?' their response was "we aren't going to do another run"


but starting with a 5.2 truck, a 5.9 swap is a drop in deal, and as long as you don't use sticky tires, the NV3500 will last awhile behind it, and you can save up $4500 or so to do a Viper T56 swap:

http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27998


Once you have the viper T56, you're free to build up whatever motor you want

408 stroker, throw spray, boost, big heads/cam at it, no worries. you won't break the T56 till north of 800hp/torque, and the stock 9.25" axle has proven to be stout enough to live behind 600+ hp builds on trucks running deep into the 10s.




If were talking about a cornering truck, wasn't 2000 the first year for the rack and pinion steering instead of the recirculating ball? Or was that 4wd only?


70 challenger convertible. 340/5 speed. blown, intercooled, efi, blah blah blah 71 valiant scamp 318/A833OD/AC/PS 00 dakota RC 4.7L 5 spd autoX'r. SRT10/T56 swap in process 73 W200 Power wagon, PTO winch, 4 spd
Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: blown340] #1631600
06/16/14 01:11 AM
06/16/14 01:11 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
7
71yelladustr Offline
super stock
71yelladustr  Offline
super stock
7

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
2wd dakotas have rack and pinion steering from the start. Here is my project. 88 dak fitted with a 5.7 hemi/727/ 8.8 explorer rear end. going to be my daily driver and possibly make a trip to the strip occasionally.

8177523-dak.jpg (60 downloads)

392 gen III hemi on E-85 727 trans Dana 60
10.02@134
Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: MuuMuu101] #1631601
06/16/14 09:55 AM
06/16/14 09:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
B
buconine Offline OP
enthusiast
buconine  Offline OP
enthusiast
B

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
omahell, ne
no smog in nebraska, so no worries there. Just gotta find a rc manual v8 truck which is much harder than i thought it would be. I'll have to start watching the used car auctions and see what turns up. Odd that most the v8 manuals are 4wd.

Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: buconine] #1631602
06/16/14 11:09 PM
06/16/14 11:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383 Offline
Too Many Posts
70Cuda383  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
Yup. My 98 has rack n pinion


**Photobucket sucks**
Re: dakota for steet/strip/autox/track fun 4.7 or 5.9? [Re: buconine] #1631603
06/19/14 12:25 PM
06/19/14 12:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 293
Michigan
C
ccarson Offline
enthusiast
ccarson  Offline
enthusiast
C

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 293
Michigan
late model HEMI would be a great swap into 2WD Dakota, I believe the Hemi is lighter than a 5.9

I used to run a 93 Dakota 2WD Short box with a warmed up 5.2 automatic
4:10 gears, small .450" lift cam, small bit of head work, shorty headers, MP Converter, M1 intake, roller rockers, plus some other tricks that truck Ran 13.20s-13.50s @ 103-105 depending on the heat.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1