Re: Totally Anal Small Block Details- 318/340/360 1972 & Up
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#1838409
06/01/15 02:28 AM
06/01/15 02:28 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714 Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms
OP
Mr Wizzard
|
OP
Mr Wizzard
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
|
I read somewhere, perhaps here on Moparts, that the earlier years used the stamped blades and later used ink. Not sure if by later meant 70-71 up ?. And I heard the same but based on Barry's 70 examples (stamped in metal) vs. my ink stamped examples, I'm not sure which happened when or why. As you mentioned, a second vendor could easily be the case. If any of you guys have any 216 or 215 blades (stamped either way) and know what year car etc. they came off of, please post your examples.
|
|
|
Re: Totally Anal Small Block Details- 318/340/360 1972 & Up
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#1851618
06/18/15 04:45 AM
06/18/15 04:45 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,655 Cut and Shoot, TX
kentj340
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,655
Cut and Shoot, TX
|
This is a 215 fan from my 69 340 4-speed with factory air. 69 340s with no air had the same 215 fan. But only 340s with air did have this thermal fan clutch part 2863263 (except clutch 2863266 if 2.76 axle). Non air 340s had a different non-thermal fan clutch. The only marking I found anywhere on the fan assembly is this 46237 emboss on the hub.
This fan clutch is a parts counter replacement date coded 7/30/73 (G30=7/30, year=DB?) but otherwise identical to a 69 factory Eaton part, according to Pampered Corvettes, who recently restored it with a date code preceding my SPD 11/8/68.
If you don't see two dolphins, you need a vacation.
|
|
|
|
|