Re: -.005 timing chain with standard sprokets
[Re: cl440]
#1607661
04/15/14 07:19 PM
04/15/14 07:19 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
I emailed Rollmaster a while back about this. Here is the response:
Chuck, The chains themselves do not make the c/c shorter. That is made up in the cam and crank gears.
Thats what I was thinking.. if it was the chain then it would bind a roller... I use a tensioner on my SB
|
|
|
Re: -.005 timing chain with standard sprokets
[Re: cl440]
#1607662
04/15/14 07:46 PM
04/15/14 07:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,015 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,015
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
I emailed Rollmaster a while back about this. Here is the response:
Chuck, The chains themselves do not make the c/c shorter. That is made up in the cam and crank gears.
Well I'll be , I'll have to go fishing to see what it is I saw ... when I have nothing to do ...
|
|
|
Re: -.005 timing chain with standard sprokets
[Re: JohnRR]
#1607664
04/15/14 08:01 PM
04/15/14 08:01 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Quote:
I emailed Rollmaster a while back about this. Here is the response:
Chuck, The chains themselves do not make the c/c shorter. That is made up in the cam and crank gears.
Well I'll be , I'll have to go fishing to see what it is I saw ... when I have nothing to do ...
If you are going to go back and delete ALL of your posts that are wrong, it may be a while till we hear back from you....which Would be a good thing
|
|
|
Re: -.005 timing chain with standard sprokets
[Re: JohnRR]
#1607666
04/16/14 11:56 AM
04/16/14 11:56 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,015 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,015
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Quote:
I emailed Rollmaster a while back about this. Here is the response:
Chuck, The chains themselves do not make the c/c shorter. That is made up in the cam and crank gears.
Well I'll be , I'll have to go fishing to see what it is I saw ... when I have nothing to do ...
My SFB stalker gave me the motivation to look around ...
Cloyes Chrysler chain at summit , .005 AND .010 shorter .
Here is the -.005 http://www.summitracing.com/parts/clo-9-134-5/overview/make/chrysler
|
|
|
Re: -.005 timing chain with standard sprokets
[Re: wyoming]
#1607669
04/16/14 06:29 PM
04/16/14 06:29 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
The Rollmaster I have was the best quality one they sell, the chain has not stretched a whole lot but it was a little loose when I put it on,and isnt getting better. The shop that machined the block for the new caps told me a standard would be fine he thought. I just thought if I could buy a shorter one I would since my spockets look excellent. I then got to thinking about the manufaturing of those and wondered how they make a chain that long .005 shorter, and wondered if the real differnce was in the sprocket od, it would seem to be much easier to do than shorten a chain? I havent counted the links in the chain but there are enough that each link would have to be .000? shorter for the chain to be .005 shorter. That seems like challenge as far as manufacturing? Would think it would be easier to make one sproket a hair bigger to take up the .005? Just got to wondering about it. I think Ill give a short one a try and see how it does, thanks guys
When you talk diameter of the TWO gears you are only making it about .0005 bigger(and thats on the large size since you talking PI)... if the rollers have enough slop between each other then they could make just the chain shorter... or if they are built to a CLOSE spec then a shorter chain would have bind on the rollers to gear... you cant change just one gear vs the other... givin enough rotations it would start to change the cam location to the crank
|
|
|
Re: -.005 timing chain with standard sprokets
[Re: wyoming]
#1607670
04/16/14 07:05 PM
04/16/14 07:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,015 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,015
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
The Rollmaster I have was the best quality one they sell, the chain has not stretched a whole lot but it was a little loose when I put it on,and isnt getting better. The shop that machined the block for the new caps told me a standard would be fine he thought. I just thought if I could buy a shorter one I would since my spockets look excellent. I then got to thinking about the manufaturing of those and wondered how they make a chain that long .005 shorter, and wondered if the real differnce was in the sprocket od, it would seem to be much easier to do than shorten a chain? I havent counted the links in the chain but there are enough that each link would have to be .000? shorter for the chain to be .005 shorter. That seems like challenge as far as manufacturing? Would think it would be easier to make one sproket a hair bigger to take up the .005? Just got to wondering about it. I think Ill give a short one a try and see how it does, thanks guys
The picture of a chevy V6 Cloyes chain I found showed one link that was a different color , I'm assuming they make the chain shorter by that one link ???
|
|
|
Re: -.005 timing chain with standard sprokets
[Re: JohnRR]
#1607671
04/16/14 07:43 PM
04/16/14 07:43 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,872 Ontario, Canada
Stanton
Don't question me!
|
Don't question me!
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,872
Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
When you talk diameter of the TWO gears you are only making it about .0005 bigger(and thats on the large size since you talking PI)... if the rollers have enough slop between each other then they could make just the chain shorter... or if they are built to a CLOSE spec then a shorter chain would have bind on the rollers to gear... you cant change just one gear vs the other... givin enough rotations it would start to change the cam location to the crank
Uh, no! When they talk "oversize" they actually mean the difference in the line bore from the stock position. So a .005" o/s would be a line bore that id .005" closer to the cam. The top sprocket ONLY is made oversize. For a .005" o/s, the top sprocket needs to shorten each side of the chain by .005". Since only half the sprocket is in contact with the chain, half the circumference has to take up .010" total. Half the circumference of a 6" diameter sprocket is close to 9.5" so the sprocket has to have about .001" per inch added to its diameter for a total of about .020". No chain will ever notice that.
As to enough rotation changing the position of the crank ... can't happen. The number of teeth is what counts and as long as its the two-to-one ratio, the crank position will never move.
|
|
|
Re: -.005 timing chain with standard sprokets
[Re: wyoming]
#1607676
04/16/14 11:54 PM
04/16/14 11:54 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,872 Ontario, Canada
Stanton
Don't question me!
|
Don't question me!
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,872
Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
Stanton, will a .005 chain be tighter on stock size sprockets? Both Rollmaster double roller? Im still not sure if the chain is shorter or the sprocket bigger, seems they offer shorter chains?
I imagine it would be tighter in the sense that it will take up the slack - not tighter as in not fitting the sprocket.
I'd always doubted the existence of shorter chains but it never occurred to me that one or two links could do the job.
|
|
|
|
|