valve body usage question. - Moparts Forums

Register Log In Moparts Forums Moparts Question and Answer valve body usage question.

Print Thread

valve body usage question. #1575934 02/08/14 06:11 PM 02/08/14 06:11 PM
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,188 imperial mo. S stickman OP super stock
stickman OP super stock S Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,188 imperial mo.	What year trans will a 1970 727 valve body work in. Would it work in a 67 or 68? Thanks Guys YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH. EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger

Re: valve body usage question. [Re: stickman] #1575935 02/09/14 12:04 AM 02/09/14 12:04 AM
Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska R RapidRobert Circle Track
RapidRobert Circle Track R Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska	I would think so but just consider this a BTT & wait for Kunkel to chime in live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth

Re: valve body usage question. [Re: RapidRobert] #1575936 02/09/14 10:36 AM 02/09/14 10:36 AM
Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,839 MI, usa dvw master
dvw master Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,839 MI, usa	Yes, no issue. Any year non lock-up from 66 up. Doug

Re: valve body usage question. [Re: dvw] #1575937 02/09/14 11:38 AM 02/09/14 11:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 21,073 Niles , Ohio T therocks oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
therocks oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah. T Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 21,073 Niles , Ohio	IIRC the combs for VBs are different in early years.I believe they changed in 68 or 69.Rocky Chrysler Firepower

Re: valve body usage question. [Re: stickman] #1575938 02/09/14 05:38 PM 02/09/14 05:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 25,808 Rio Linda, CA John_Kunkel Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel Too Many Posts Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 25,808 Rio Linda, CA	A '70 VB is correct for only '68-'70 but it will work in a '66-'67. '71 and later cases have a different accumulator fluid circuit. The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway

Re: valve body usage question. [Re: John_Kunkel] #1575939 02/09/14 05:50 PM 02/09/14 05:50 PM
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,188 imperial mo. S stickman OP super stock
stickman OP super stock S Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,188 imperial mo.	Thanks Guys....... YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH. EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger

Re: valve body usage question. [Re: stickman] #1575940 02/10/14 02:39 AM 02/10/14 02:39 AM
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 5,399 Aurora, Colorado 451Mopar master
451Mopar master Joined: May 2008 Posts: 5,399 Aurora, Colorado	As mentioned the shift rooster combs are different for the different style of neutral safety switch. The '70 and later used the three prong switch for the reverse lights too. The earlier one did not control the reverse lights. I also think the stop tang is different on the shift comb. I think I ran into a problem swapping them because of the stop?

Re: valve body usage question. [Re: 451Mopar] #1575941 02/10/14 06:31 PM 02/10/14 06:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 25,808 Rio Linda, CA John_Kunkel Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel Too Many Posts Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 25,808 Rio Linda, CA	The rooster comb problem only arises if you try to swap one into the incorrect VB casting, for a complete VB swap (like the OP) the 3-prong rooster comb will work with the '64-'68 single-prong switch but not vice-versa. The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway

Moderated by Al_Alguire, Hotwheelsjr, moparts, not_a_charger, RangerDan440, tboomer

Hop To

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1