Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
More shock discussion #1545631
12/09/13 08:58 AM
12/09/13 08:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work OP
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work OP
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
I got to thinking about all of this talk about front shocks. My 64 is just a bracket car that I would like to keep around a 10.0 or so. My CE 90/10s are going on 14 years old so I think it is time to replace them! I don't think I need a 500 dollar shock. So I am leaning towards a QA or Afco shock. What do you guys like and if possible how about a part number? Thanks!! Ted


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: More shock discussion [Re: tboomer] #1545632
12/09/13 10:34 AM
12/09/13 10:34 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt Offline
master
1967dartgt  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
At 9.90 or slower you can use a calvert front shock. Worked great on my car till I turned up the wick. If you get a adjustable shock you are going adjust it to basically a 90/10 shock any way.

Re: More shock discussion [Re: 1967dartgt] #1545633
12/09/13 10:36 AM
12/09/13 10:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work OP
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work OP
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
Thanks! The reason I was looking into the Afco or QA 1 is that Summit will soon have their big sale...


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: More shock discussion [Re: tboomer] #1545634
12/09/13 10:40 AM
12/09/13 10:40 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Ted I run Strange stuts on the front of both the P-
body and the Rampage... rears on the P are QA-1 and
Strange rears on the Rampage.. all of them are adjustable

Re: More shock discussion [Re: tboomer] #1545635
12/09/13 10:45 AM
12/09/13 10:45 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Thanks! The reason I was looking into the Afco or QA 1 is that Summit will soon have their big sale...




The Calverts are not adjustable but work well... I
prefer ajustable shocks if you race different tracks...
the Afco is a little better than the QA-1 if you ask
some people... I'm VERY happy with the old QA-1s on
the rear of the P-Body.. they are the old 12 click
but they dont make them any more

Re: More shock discussion [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1545636
12/09/13 10:50 AM
12/09/13 10:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work OP
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work OP
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
Mike...I have the Alstons on the back.


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: More shock discussion [Re: tboomer] #1545637
12/09/13 10:56 AM
12/09/13 10:56 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Mike...I have the Alstons on the back.




I never tried them so I dont know anything about them..
I assume they are from Alston Chassis... so someone
built them for them.. but I have on idea who

Re: More shock discussion [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1545638
12/09/13 10:58 AM
12/09/13 10:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work OP
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work OP
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
Yes..They are the Vari-Shocks..


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: More shock discussion [Re: tboomer] #1545639
12/09/13 12:33 PM
12/09/13 12:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953
Houston, Texas
TheOtherDodge Offline
master
TheOtherDodge  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953
Houston, Texas
Ted, if it's working for you, stick with it! And if you decided to not upgrade, I have a set of 3 way adjustables that I took off the front and replaced with QA1's if you want them. The are eye/stud style but not sure of the ext/collapsed length but can check for you if you are interested.

Re: More shock discussion [Re: tboomer] #1545640
12/09/13 01:56 PM
12/09/13 01:56 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
Quote:

I got to thinking about all of this talk about front shocks. My 64 is just a bracket car that I would like to keep around a 10.0 or so. My CE 90/10s are going on 14 years old so I think it is time to replace them! I don't think I need a 500 dollar shock. So I am leaning towards a QA or Afco shock. What do you guys like and if possible how about a part number? Thanks!! Ted




At 14 years old I`d be amazed if they were working properly unless there`s little time/passes on em and the Calvert fixed 90-10`s work well so far but I too am leaning towards a single adj. up ft. and doubles in the rear...........


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: More shock discussion [Re: Thumperdart] #1545641
12/09/13 02:08 PM
12/09/13 02:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,367
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,367
Las Vegas
VariShocks like others out there use Koni valving. They are pretty decent pieces from what I have seen.


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: More shock discussion [Re: Al_Alguire] #1545642
12/09/13 02:55 PM
12/09/13 02:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,247
Mt. Vernon, Ohio
dartman366 Offline
I Live Here
dartman366  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,247
Mt. Vernon, Ohio
Quote:

VariShocks like others out there use Koni valving. They are pretty decent pieces from what I have seen.


I have heard the same thing about the vari-shock,,I personally run the QA-1's double adjustable on the rear and singles on the front, I have been curious about using doubles on the front and if it would be worth the extra money.


Light travels faster than the speed of sound,,,this is why some people seem bright untill you hear them speak.
Re: More shock discussion [Re: 1967dartgt] #1545643
12/09/13 11:23 PM
12/09/13 11:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,990
Anoka County, MN
Leigh Offline
master
Happy Birthday Leigh  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,990
Anoka County, MN
Quote:

At 9.90 or slower you can use a calvert front shock. Worked great on my car till I turned up the wick. If you get a adjustable shock you are going adjust it to basically a 90/10 shock any way.




I agree with this, with an exception. Bump valving is key. Hal Lees told me years ago, a steel bodied, oem type shock, can't absorb the loading seen on a wheelstand landing. The internal valving will "freak out" (how he described it), and blow by, letting the car crash down. He had a hand in the original 90/10 shock design. I have experienced this "freak out" valving first hand. I would go with Afco, QA1, or Strange doubles, just to have the extra tuneability, and a real adjustable shock, instead of an oem body, with their inherent limitations.

Re: More shock discussion [Re: Leigh] #1545644
12/10/13 12:07 AM
12/10/13 12:07 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,384
Worst Weather USA
493_DART Offline
master
493_DART  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,384
Worst Weather USA
I would leave the old CE on...

I have the Calverts---the extension on them vs any other standard 90/10 shock is WAYYY more loose.

I "pull tested" them on the bench....my old Summits were kind of difficult to pull apart..... the calverts pull out EASY and fast.

Re: More shock discussion [Re: 493_DART] #1545645
12/10/13 09:34 AM
12/10/13 09:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work OP
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work OP
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
Thanks,guys! These pull out easy and fast! I think too fast!


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: More shock discussion [Re: tboomer] #1545646
12/10/13 11:24 PM
12/10/13 11:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,587
Great Neck,LI,new york
hemi-itis Offline
I Live Here
hemi-itis  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,587
Great Neck,LI,new york
I'm in shock shock right now myself.I need to upgrade my shocks this winter.
At what ET,speed or HP do you need to step up to the Santhoff shock??? I'm kinds liking the Vi-king da's


HEMI-ITIS has no cure.
My condition is fully BLOWN!!
Re: More shock discussion [Re: Al_Alguire] #1545647
12/11/13 04:21 AM
12/11/13 04:21 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 197
Nor-Cal
L
loaderpro Offline
member
loaderpro  Offline
member
L

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 197
Nor-Cal
Harcourt (Hal) Lees is the man responsible for a lot of technology in the shock world. Yes he had a hand in the first 90/10. Did a stint with Koni Americas and the then Alston Engineering and developed the Koni 82 series SPA-1 valving for drag racing. Had his own shock company, AVO USA, which later became Hals Shocks, which was bought out by QA-1 whom also bought out Carrera. Left QA 1, went back to work for Chris Alston (Chassis Works) and helped them design and build the Varishock, Which incidently are manufactured and built in house at Chassisworks. So when you say "Koni valving" That is all Hal Lees! The last I heard he was doing business as Hal Lees Enterprise (performance shock rebuilding and sales) in Palm City Fla.

7955064-pomona.jpg (39 downloads)
Re: More shock discussion [Re: loaderpro] #1545648
12/12/13 01:01 AM
12/12/13 01:01 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,864
IN
Irun5snd8th Offline
master
Irun5snd8th  Offline
master

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,864
IN
90/10's and loose front shocks are not always the best thing. What happens is when you run them that loose you get all the hit all at once and when the shock tops out it can unload the tires. Cars often benefit from stiffer shock settings on the front rather than all the way loose like is commonly thought for the reason stated above. Especially on big power cars this is often true. Good shocks are also velocity sensitive, meaning that the faster they move, the more they absorb with the valving. And the valving on the compression side is equally important. When you the car lands it needs to absorb the weight coming down so as not to hit and unload the rear tires. Any car that lands from a wheelie hard enough to bounce the front tires back up in the air is a perfect example of this. If you had a data logger on one of these cars you would see increased driveshaft speed as the front end lands. Go watch a round of Super Stock and watch how many of the really good cars land and just touch and stick the front end. Violent launching and landing looks cool but typically is not fast nor consistent.


AFCO, Rons Fuel Injection sponsored Dodge Challenger Mention Street Lethal Motorsports
Re: More shock discussion [Re: Irun5snd8th] #1545649
12/15/13 12:26 PM
12/15/13 12:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work OP
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work OP
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,939
United Socialist States of Ame...
Thanks to dvw(Doug) for the part number!!


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1