Building a 440 with low compression pistons.. opinions.
#153964
11/20/08 08:39 AM
11/20/08 08:39 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,282 Danville, NH
Mopar_Mike
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,282
Danville, NH
|
I am going to be building the numbers matching 440 for a 67 Coronet RT I have. I am not looking to go with anything wild, actually looking for a good "smooth" idling set up. I will be running the stock 2.08 1.74 915 heads, aluminum intake, 750 Holley, HP manifolds and electronic ignition. My question is, I have a new set of TRW L2388 forged pistons, but they sit way deep in the hole, like around .080-1.0. and will probably give me around 8.1 or so compression with the steel shim gasket. I don't want to build a Dog 440 but I would like to be around 400hp. What do you guys think about these pistons and/or set up? Thanks.
RS23L7 4-Speed
|
|
|
Re: Building a 440 with low compression pistons.. opinions.
[Re: Mopar_Mike]
#153971
11/20/08 11:42 AM
11/20/08 11:42 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
What JohnRR said, definitely do not use those pistons & get a set of kieth black hypers & adjust your deck height & with the right head gaskets to get your piston to head clearance(quench) at .035-.040 which will let you run a CR in the 10's. 93 octane will support this ONLY if you have .035-.040 quench. Squeeze is power & a high CR is the main parameter that makes it.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Building a 440 with low compression pistons.. opini
[Re: RapidRobert]
#153972
11/20/08 11:45 AM
11/20/08 11:45 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
What JohnRR said, definitely do not use those pistons & get a set of kieth black hypers & adjust your deck height & with the right head gaskets to get your piston to head clearance(quench) at .035-.040 which will let you run a CR in the 10's. 93 octane will support this ONLY if you have .035-.040 quench. Squeeze is power & a high CR is the main parameter that makes it.
he is using closed chamber heads so there is no reason to buy a step head piston unless you are a glutton for punishment
|
|
|
Re: Building a 440 with low compression pistons.. opini
[Re: JohnRR]
#153973
11/20/08 11:50 AM
11/20/08 11:50 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
I dont know about a step head piston but one of KB's offerings that would give him quench with the closed chambers & ending up with a CR in the 10's would suit his purposes perfectly.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Building a 440 with low compression pistons.. opinions.
[Re: Dodgebrother]
#153976
11/20/08 01:07 PM
11/20/08 01:07 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
I've used Kieth Black hypers & havent had a problem with them but they have a CHEAP look about them that's always bothered me & I have been thinking the same thing that for a little bit more money I could end up with something much better with forged ones.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Building a 440 with low compression pistons.. opinions.
[Re: Mopar_Mike]
#153977
11/20/08 02:01 PM
11/20/08 02:01 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Or find a stroker crank for $400, spend $100 to trim .1 off the tops of the pistons you have and have even more fun for just slightly more than new pistons.
Sheldon
|
|
|
Re: Building a 440 with low compression pistons.. opinions.
[Re: Mopar_Mike]
#153979
11/21/08 05:27 PM
11/21/08 05:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,263 Southwestern Ontario Canada
racealittle
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,263
Southwestern Ontario Canada
|
I have been beating on a short block that has .030 2266F pistons in it for going on 27 years. The pistons are down .089 in the hole. I tried various cams, intakes, gear ratios, converters etc.
I had a spare set of ootb eddy rpms and rpm intake that I put on with 2" TTI headers. The same cam, a MP.474 has been in it for at least 10 years with a factory stock 2400 converter from a 360 727 (weights deleted).
At 3925 lbs. it ran a best of 12.2 at 111.9 mph after driving it to the track, (1 1/2 hour trip at highway speeds). The combination is not really sorted because I don't really care. It's just a 87 octane driver. A tune might put it in the 11's, a little NOS would put it to the limit without a roll cage.
I'm sure others have gone faster or slower. Low compression inadequate quench motors can make power if you are so inclined. My car is a joy to drive on the street and has enough power (torque) to surprise most who experience a ride in it.
I built the short block when I didn't know any better, and it has been a dependable, frugal piece.
Too many cars, too many parts, too little coin, too little space to work in, too little time left to make it all happen!
Update: down to one ride, still too many parts, a little more jingle in the pocket, gaining space, and it's going to happen this year!
|
|
|
Re: Building a 440 with low compression pistons.. opinions.
[Re: forphorty]
#153981
11/21/08 09:25 PM
11/21/08 09:25 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Quote:
i also have a 440 with the 2266 pistons and also at the time didnt know any better.they were the pistons that PAW sold at the time, so thats what i got.little did i know that i would only have about 8.5 comp. even so it has ran well (12.35) for a cheap 906 head hydraulic cam engine. on the other hand...im not sure about the 2388. i think that is a 72-78 replacement piston but forged. i would think it would be more like .110+ down in the hole unless the block was decked a bunch.seems like that might put compression down in the 7s even with the smaller chamber.
I've been told the 2388's are just an older version of the 2266 - 1.991 compression height, no valve reliefs. Should sit .08-.1 in the hole.
|
|
|
|
|