Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing #151901
11/16/08 08:01 PM
11/16/08 08:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline OP
EL Master
domingo  Offline OP
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
Whats the difference between the

2892257 11" clutch A-833 1968-1969 B-body 426 HEMI Cast Iron


and the

2892626 11" clutch A-833 1969 B-body C-body 383 440 Cast Iron


bellhousings?????

Why do they have different casting numbers of both use the 11" clutch???

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: domingo] #151902
11/16/08 08:04 PM
11/16/08 08:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
the difference is the the hemi starter and the hemi uses a 172 tooth wheel

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: domingo] #151903
11/16/08 08:06 PM
11/16/08 08:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,988
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,988
Rio Linda, CA

The Hemi uses a 172 tooth flywheel while the 383/440 uses the 143 tooth flywheel; different diameters.

Also the Hemi uses a didect drive starter while the 383/440 use the gear reduction starter; different mounting pad.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: JohnRR] #151904
11/16/08 08:07 PM
11/16/08 08:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline OP
EL Master
domingo  Offline OP
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
OK I see....the 172 tooth wheel and the starter I take they are HEMI only items....right?

And are they only available as original items or can you get aftermarket 172 tooth flywheels_?

I hear those direct drive starters are a pain in the butt and they are know to fail easily....right?

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: domingo] #151905
11/16/08 08:16 PM
11/16/08 08:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
Quote:

OK I see....the 172 tooth wheel and the starter I take they are HEMI only items....right?

And are they only available as original items or can you get aftermarket 172 tooth flywheels_?

I hear those direct drive starters are a pain in the butt and they are know to fail easily....right?




first one YES

Yes to AFTERMARKET

the DD starter is VERY hard to FIND and very $$$$ when and IF you find one , RobbMc sells a Replacement , but if you need to have an ORIGINAL PRY open the WALLET for the bell and the starter

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: JohnRR] #151906
11/16/08 08:26 PM
11/16/08 08:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline OP
EL Master
domingo  Offline OP
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
why did mopar have those HEMI scpecific items instead of using the regular B/RB for the HEMI as well?

Wasnt the B/RB stuff good enough???? Why not use the same stuff?

I believe in 70 and 71 they used the same bellhousings, flywheels (cept for the 8 bolts on the hemi) and starters for both HEMI and B/RB....right?

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: domingo] #151907
11/16/08 08:35 PM
11/16/08 08:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
Quote:

why did mopar have those HEMI scpecific items instead of using the regular B/RB for the HEMI as well?

Wasnt the B/RB stuff good enough???? Why not use the same stuff?

I believe in 70 and 71 they used the same bellhousings, flywheels (cept for the 8 bolts on the hemi) and starters for both HEMI and B/RB....right?




why did they do it ??? your guess is as good as mine , but that's the way it is so if you are after ORIGINALITY just realize it DOES NOT MATTER WHY , find the parts and buy them .

in 1970 someone decided it was CHEAPER to use the RB parts which gave the factory a HIGHER profit

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: domingo] #151908
11/16/08 08:39 PM
11/16/08 08:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,758
North Dakota
6PakBee Offline
I Live Here
6PakBee  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,758
North Dakota
Quote:

why did mopar have those HEMI scpecific items instead of using the regular B/RB for the HEMI as well?

Wasnt the B/RB stuff good enough???? Why not use the same stuff?

I believe in 70 and 71 they used the same bellhousings, flywheels (cept for the 8 bolts on the hemi) and starters for both HEMI and B/RB....right?




Who knows? Maybe they felt the 10 1/2" clutch wasn't enough with mid-60's technology and opted for the 11"/172 tooth/direct drive route. As a note, the automatics have always used gear reduction units so I would doubt it was a decision based on starter power. If you could find a 143 tooth aftermarket flywheel with an eight bolt pattern, that would be an option other than resorting to the '70-'71 aluminum bell.


"We live in a time when intelligent people are being silenced so that stupid people won't be offended".
Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: 6PakBee] #151909
11/16/08 08:54 PM
11/16/08 08:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline OP
EL Master
domingo  Offline OP
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
OK I see....

thanks for the replies....

even though my car is an original 69 matching numbers HEMI charger I dont see myself spending 3k on a correct housing, flywheel and starter that still need to be restored!

I have a 69 2892626 bellhousing and I think the flywheel I got with the car is a billet 8 bolt 143 tooth unit. So that should work and look "STOCK".

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: domingo] #151910
11/16/08 08:57 PM
11/16/08 08:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
Quote:

OK I see....

thanks for the replies....

even though my car is an original 69 matching numbers HEMI charger I dont see myself spending 3k on a correct housing, flywheel and starter that still need to be restored!

I have a 69 2892626 bellhousing and I think the flywheel I got with the car is a billet 8 bolt 143 tooth unit. So that should work and look "STOCK".




The only thing that will not look stock to the hemi purist will be the starter , but they will have to crawl under the car to see it .... use what you have .

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: JohnRR] #151911
11/16/08 09:56 PM
11/16/08 09:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline OP
EL Master
domingo  Offline OP
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
OK, that will work....

and if they crawl under the car to see if the starter is the correct direct drive unit I will have the chance to give em a good kick on the butt!


Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: domingo] #151912
11/16/08 10:03 PM
11/16/08 10:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,094
A Banana Republic near you.
Quote:

OK, that will work....

and if they crawl under the car to see if the starter is the correct direct drive unit I will have the chance to give em a good kick on the butt!






or the head ???

Re: 2892259 HEMI bellhousing vs. 2892626 B/RB Bellhousing [Re: JohnRR] #151913
11/16/08 10:30 PM
11/16/08 10:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline OP
EL Master
domingo  Offline OP
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
I like to keep the head for afterwards,,,when I run over it while I back up the car...LOL







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1