Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: BeeSuper]
#1460752
07/01/13 11:55 AM
07/01/13 11:55 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746 Ontario, Canada
Dodgem
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
|
I would think it's a good kit. get ARP main studs or better a Hughes crank girdle kit. http://chucker54.stores.yahoo.net/hufiallmobig.htmlMancini also has some cap and girdle packages with new caps. next step up in caps and girdle http://www.bcrproducts.com/Some like to do a half fill of hard block (just to the top of the frost plugs) for a little extra cylinder support. some notching at the bottom of cylinder bores will likely be needed and an external pickup up system. Just my and some ideas.
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: Abodyjohn88]
#1460756
07/01/13 05:36 PM
07/01/13 05:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,071 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,071
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
I would think you will be better off going with a 500 inch stroker kit instead of the 540 with the stock block,a 4'5 inch crank is huge for a stock block and you may have some clearancing and strength issues. The 500 inch deal will be a relatively easy combo to put together.
I'm with this, that's a long arm and a lot of torque for a stock block.
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: JohnRR]
#1460758
07/01/13 05:59 PM
07/01/13 05:59 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Its a STREET engine... pressure will be low and revs will be also for the most part... yes that would be a good street engine.. still will make good torque with low pressure and low rpm.. the stock block will handle it IF it measures ok
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: fullmetaljacket]
#1460760
07/01/13 11:13 PM
07/01/13 11:13 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,378 Rancho Cordova, CA
Exit1965
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,378
Rancho Cordova, CA
|
Quote:
If I'm correct, Best Machine does all the fine tuning on those kits and short blocks. Good workmanship.
Shortblocks? I don't see them on Mancini's website.
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: BeeSuper]
#1460763
07/02/13 08:27 AM
07/02/13 08:27 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,011 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,011
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
The 540 kit offers the advantage of lighter pistons, most likely, and for sure less rpm with a wider torque curve, more of it down low where a streeter likes it. I don't see any down side to the longer stroke in a stock block, provided you rev it where it wants to run-low rpm. You should be about as fast as you can be shifting below 6000 to 6200 rpm, and that would be with a VERY big cam. I like your choice.
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: BeeSuper]
#1460765
07/02/13 03:50 PM
07/02/13 03:50 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544 Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
|
From what you have posted, you can make MORE than enough power with a smaller efficient motor for what your doing. I am not a fan of putting a 4.500 crank in a stock block. I dont care HOW easy you think your going to be, thats a tough situation for a stock block. A 4.15-4.375 will do plenty. Your money though, just my
RIP Monte Smith
Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.
WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: BeeSuper]
#1460767
07/02/13 04:00 PM
07/02/13 04:00 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Thanks. I am gonna talk with Hughes Engines, real helpful guys and with Hensley,also seemed very helpful and knowledgable and get their opinion / perspective. I will be using my stock six pack set up and TTI headers. 4 speed, 4.10 dana (A-12 clone SuperBee) I'm told the intake will hold it back but my machinist warns that it only takes once to over rev that may hurt. Looking into a girdle and even partial hard block but still unsure. This car will be street driven modestly but I just know there may come a time when the excitement of an unexpected bout with a rice burner will have me giving it hell.
With a 4 speed and 4.10 gears you dont need that much torque... as some have said you might have a longer engine life if you go with the shorter stroke... unless its super heavy car... first gear might be close to useless
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1460768
07/02/13 04:33 PM
07/02/13 04:33 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,164 CT
GTX MATT
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,164
CT
|
Is anyone managing to run a 4.5 inch arm with a stock oil pickup? I've heard you can get away with it at 4.375, is it even within the realm of possibility?
Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: FastmOp]
#1460769
07/03/13 12:33 AM
07/03/13 12:33 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,421 Toronto
mshred
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,421
Toronto
|
Quote:
I have a 4.5 crank in my stock block. I run hi 5's low 6's depending on if I'm bracket racing or index racing. Built it 2010. I like the 541 combo. My crank is from 440 source
Any hard block or a girdle? What rpms do you turn?
|
|
|
Re: 540 stroker from Mancini
[Re: mshred]
#1460770
07/03/13 01:10 AM
07/03/13 01:10 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,011 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,011
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
With a Six Pack intake your motor may be all done at 5200 rpm? That more than offsets the longer stroke, and I can understand some not liking that long of an arm in a stock block, but before saying it is not the right way to go, I would really like to see a stress analysis done using all the right numbers between the possible choices. I am willing to bet that there is less stress on a 4.50 stroke 7.10 rod motor using those heads and the right rpm, than there is with a 4.15 stroke motor with a bit heavier piston, along with attending higher rpm before the motor runs out of cylinder head flow. I have run a 4.5 stroke stock block combo, and with iron heads flowing about 280 cfm. It liked a shift point of 5700 rpm, and that was with a hogged out tunnelram and twin 800cfm holleys. It made decent power for what I put in it, and other than some cap walk, wasn't a problem till the crank broke. For a bigger head, I would agree that it would be pushing it. A 440-1 or similar head with a matching intake system would be walking on thin ice. But I have a friend that races that package, running low nines in a 3000 lb car on a regular basis.
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
|
|