Re: 318 build
[Re: 65rbdodge]
#1348024
12/09/12 02:03 PM
12/09/12 02:03 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
I would suggest building one with quench which would let you run more scr on the exact same octane for more torque with it being cube limited but that'd for sure be alot more time/money than just purchasing a built short block
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: OrangeProwler]
#1348027
12/09/12 08:22 PM
12/09/12 08:22 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487 Florida
scratchnfotraction
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
|
Quote:
I'm going to go against the grain here and suggest that if you must stick with a 318 may I suggest finding a running 5.2 Magnum from a 92-01 Dodge truck/suv/van. I think you can use the Magnum pan for your application. Get an Air Gap Intake and set up an electric fuel. Get a 600-650 cfm carburetor and swap over your existing water pump, timing cover and valve covers if you desire. At least with this setup you'll have better heads and a roller cam. You can cam if you want to and I would suggest looking up the user "Patrick" for his posts on cam selection if you want to swap cams but, then you'll also need to swap springs/retainers in the heads. JMO.
I would go with a 85 or newer pre-mag roller cam 318. select some cheap stock parts on the roller gear,oil thru lifters and hollow PRs and use a nice after market roller cam.
you are then one step away from a magnum head upgrade.
member "Patrick" recomended the lunati 60710 voodoo roller cam with comp 901-16 springs for the 318 in my 85 stepside. it is a great daily driver cam in a truck and I am knocking back 19+ mpgs with a highway gear in it.
its in my 2nd 318 now,first was a 360 headed 318 and now a #302 headed 318. worked great in both engines in the truck with a 600 cfm carb/LD4B intake/headers
I have used some 360s in a couple 4x4 with 318 heads swaped on them,that gives a comp bump,torque bump, makes a nice work truck engine. carefully built it can be a torque monster.
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: scratchnfotraction]
#1348028
12/10/12 10:12 AM
12/10/12 10:12 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123 Grand Haven, MI
patrick
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
|
XE268 is way too big for a stock 318 in a heavy 4x4. it'll be a total dog below 3000 RPM.
biggest cam I'd go would be an XE256 or lunati voodoo 60401.
but I agree with others, at the very least I'd start with an 85 up 318 to get a roller cam motor with 302's, or a '92 up magnum motor.
1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD 1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!*** 2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T 2017 Grand Cherokee Overland 2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: Fury Fan]
#1348030
12/11/12 04:25 PM
12/11/12 04:25 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 936
OLD318
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
Based on all reports I've read, you won't get more than ~250-275 hp thru -302 heads....
I'm quite sure your right here...
If it's a stock 302 head with the stock 318 1.78 intake and 1.5 exhaust then no I see no way to get HP over ~250... 318 heads don't flow anything... Therefore they are never used on performance builds...
If I recall correctly, the "High" performance 318 builds (Over 250 HP) take the 302 head and give it a 360 valve job (1.88 intake 1.6 exhaust) then the do a mild 360 port on the heads to mate with the 4bbl intake ports. Which are larger than the stock 318 ports...
Now the head is flowing more,hence more HP (with the proper cam etc).
If memory servers me...
If you put 340/360 heads directly on a 318 you will have nothing for compression.... so to make it work you have to mill the block to get the compression back...
When building a 318 for more power it becomes 1 of 2 basic options
1) use 340/360 heads but mill the block
or
2) rework the 318 heads.... 340/360 valve job and port
Either way your machining costs are increased...
This is why folks say...forget it, just get a 360 or a 340!! and you don't have to do any of this???
Cost considerations =================== What is the machining cost of the 318 (either option) vs the 340 build or 360 build?
318 block/heads cores are cheap... 340 block/heads cores are not (360 cores are usually in between the two)
NOTE: The price on all of these cores/heads are not going down BTW)
If your goal is 350-400 HP The question is... with all the machining work is it worth it cost wise (cheaper) to build the 318 or just pay up for a core 340 and build it...
I think the consensus on this board is... Given the HP requirement, just build the 340/360...
If you personally are an engine builder and like this kind of stuff (Porting/milling etc) and you want to tinker with the 318 - Great!
The rest of us have to pay up to do this..
Best of luck to you either way
|
|
|
|
|