Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Cam Comparison - Thoughts? #1344853
12/02/12 08:49 AM
12/02/12 08:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,880
Out in Left Field, NY
B
bobs66440 Offline OP
top fuel
bobs66440  Offline OP
top fuel
B

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,880
Out in Left Field, NY
I'm currently running the Summit 6401 cam with (9.35.1)

282/292 adv duration
.465/.488 lift
114 LSA
(calls for min. 9.5:1 compression but seems to work very nice)



Comp recommended the 268H (21-223-4)

268/280 adv duration
.477/.480 lift
110 LSA


Why/is the Comp cam better for my setup for street driving. What are the differences in characteristics?

The reason why I'm asking is, I have to change the cam & lifters due to a bad lifter issue (long story ). Putting in a different cam may open up a can of worms with lifter preload and I don't want to go through ordering a new set of pushrods again. If I'm not going to notice a difference, it won't be worth the hassle. I might as well put another 6401 cam in...

Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: bobs66440] #1344854
12/02/12 10:05 AM
12/02/12 10:05 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
advertised durations mean next to nothing?? why the industry standard uses .050?

Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: bobs66440] #1344855
12/02/12 10:11 AM
12/02/12 10:11 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
I don't think you would see any difference in performance the comp cam will give an ever so slightly rougher idle and a bit more and a tiny bit
more hp.

Why would lifter pre load be enough difference to worry about they are most likely ground on the same base circle unless summits is a smaller chevy size.

Last edited by Dodgem; 12/02/12 10:15 AM.
Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: Dodgem] #1344856
12/02/12 10:53 AM
12/02/12 10:53 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,880
Out in Left Field, NY
B
bobs66440 Offline OP
top fuel
bobs66440  Offline OP
top fuel
B

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,880
Out in Left Field, NY
Quote:

advertised durations mean next to nothing?? why the industry standard uses .050?


I'm not sure what you mean...

Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: Dodgem] #1344857
12/02/12 11:15 AM
12/02/12 11:15 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,880
Out in Left Field, NY
B
bobs66440 Offline OP
top fuel
bobs66440  Offline OP
top fuel
B

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,880
Out in Left Field, NY
Quote:


Why would lifter pre load be enough difference to worry about they are most likely ground on the same base circle unless summits is a smaller chevy size.



I don't really know much about it. I read that the base circles on cams are different brand to brand so that would effect the lifter preload. I would like to use the Comp cam since I already have it, but I can't get any info on the base circles of each. So I wouldn't know if the preload is effected until I install it. Then it's too late to return...

Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: bobs66440] #1344858
12/02/12 11:54 AM
12/02/12 11:54 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
the comp cams cam advertised rating is at .006 lobe lift. the summit cam is the old crane HMV-278-2 that the advertised rating is at .0042 lobe lift. the problem with advertised numbers for the average person is that cam grinders use different lobe lifts for ratings. it really isn't an issue once you understand who is doing what. with .050 number everybody is on the same playing field. solid lifter and roller profiles are really a little more complicated for advertised numbers but once you understand the system a lot of the fog goes away.
the comp cams 268, with 110lsa and 4 degrees of advance ground into it,will give more low end torque but horsepower will peak sooner. it's more aggressive lobes are more failure prone. the summit cam with its 114lsa will have a more gentle torque curve, probably no big difference in horsepower compared to the 268, and will probably last longer. the real issue is the tappets that are causing a problem. you probably have gotten a set of Stanadynes with the summit camshaft. those tappets are crap. depending on how much wear you have on the lobes of the summit cam i'd think about a new quality tappet and do a break-in again. spring pressures and rocker ratio may come into to play also.

Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: bobs66440] #1344859
12/02/12 12:25 PM
12/02/12 12:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
I would use the comp if you have it. there is a standard base circle for most mopar cams I'm sure you are fine.



No adjustable rockers?


The summit cam is 224/234 @ .050
the comp cam is 224/230 @ .050

Last edited by Dodgem; 12/02/12 02:40 PM.
Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: lewtot184] #1344860
12/02/12 03:14 PM
12/02/12 03:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
Quote:

...the comp cams 268, with 110lsa and 4 degrees of advance ground into it,will give more low end torque but horsepower will peak sooner. it's more aggressive lobes are more failure prone. the summit cam with its 114lsa will have a more gentle torque curve, probably no big difference in horsepower compared to the 268....






These cams will be very close in power output. The power curve will just be shaped a little different. The advertised numbers do make a difference but if the manufacturers are not using the same lobe lift standard it makes the comparison difficult. But even with that, these to cams are close. The Comp will probably be a little sharper down low but the Summit will be a little flatter after peak power. you'll probably have valve train noise with the Comp, if that matters to you.

You really won't know if one makes more power than the other unless you are doing some very controlled before and after track testing.

Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: BSB67] #1344861
12/02/12 04:28 PM
12/02/12 04:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,880
Out in Left Field, NY
B
bobs66440 Offline OP
top fuel
bobs66440  Offline OP
top fuel
B

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,880
Out in Left Field, NY
Thanks for all the replies. I would like to use the Comp cam based on the response, but what scares me is the comment "more aggressive lobes are more failure prone". Hey, I'm all for more power but I have enough problems with the MILDER cam. I don't want to have to go through this again soon...

Valve train noise doesn't bother me as long as I know it's normal...

I'll have to put some more thought into it....

Re: Cam Comparison - Thoughts? [Re: bobs66440] #1344862
12/02/12 04:45 PM
12/02/12 04:45 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker


Valve train noise doesn't bother me as long as I know it's normal...

I'll have to put some more thought into it....




Do put more thought into the valvetrain, since it's a MAJOR part of power production. Adjustable rocker arms would be a good insurance policy with hydraulics, as well as
matching (rate) valve springs. In reality, it's best to go with a complete cam kit. Performance-wise, it's just common sense!



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1