|
Re: 69 Road Runner Horns from Vans
[Re: 65pacecar]
#1340466
11/24/12 11:45 AM
11/24/12 11:45 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,469 NE Ohio
mopar383
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,469
NE Ohio
|
I'd restore the original if you could
81 Dodge Ram My dad bought brand new... my 17 year old sons project Jeep Wrangler Unlimited .....my wife's baby Durango....my DD Caravan...an awesome parts hauler 72 Dart
|
|
|
Re: 69 Road Runner Horns from Vans
[Re: 65pacecar]
#1340467
11/24/12 12:46 PM
11/24/12 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,632 jersey shore
flypaper
I hate Texas
|
I hate Texas
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,632
jersey shore
|
you already know the repo's suck and you buy another hoping they are somehow magically better? this doesn't make much sense to me...
|
|
|
Re: 69 Road Runner Horns from Vans
[Re: FJR doc]
#1340469
11/24/12 01:17 PM
11/24/12 01:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,632 jersey shore
flypaper
I hate Texas
|
I hate Texas
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,632
jersey shore
|
Quote:
Flypaper, just answer the OP's question. You should keep your opinions to yourself.
all i will say to him then is, check on van's return policy and roger gibson sells a horn restore kit with the paint and decal...
|
|
|
Re: 69 Road Runner Horns from Vans
[Re: 1_WILD_RT]
#1340471
11/24/12 04:58 PM
11/24/12 04:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Flypaper, just answer the OP's question. You should keep your opinions to yourself.
Wow! We have a New Forum Monitor...
There is a long list of them
|
|
|
Re: 69 Road Runner Horns from Vans
[Re: flypaper]
#1340473
11/25/12 12:05 AM
11/25/12 12:05 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,710 KY
65pacecar
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,710
KY
|
Quote:
you already know the repo's suck and you buy another hoping they are somehow magically better? this doesn't make much sense to me...
That was my question The repo I bought sounded like crap but it was several years ago I was hoping they had been retooled and corrected by now.
|
|
|
|
|
|