|
Re: Fast ratio pitman/idler arm vs. fast rat steering boxio
[Re: Dan Halen]
#1308343
09/21/12 09:55 PM
09/21/12 09:55 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,096 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,096
Valencia, España
|
there are these fast radio pieces for 73 and lates B bodies ?
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: Fast ratio pitman/idler arm vs. fast rat steering boxio
[Re: Mike H]
#1308344
09/21/12 10:58 PM
09/21/12 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Fast ratio boxes refers to manual steering, unless it's the new Delphi based unit for amazing money. There is an old thread in the handling forum on them. I'm not seeing a box for a 70 Cuda on their site so I dunno.
The arms are cheaper but they can hit headers not designed for the added length of the arms.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: Fast ratio pitman/idler arm vs. fast rat steering boxio
[Re: Mike H]
#1308346
09/22/12 05:08 AM
09/22/12 05:08 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,337 the house on the left.
cogen80
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,337
the house on the left.
|
Quote:
PST advertises a fast ratio (12:1 vs. 16:1 stock)idler and pitman arm I am thinking of getting for my 70 Cuda. I have also seen fast ratio steering boxes available. Any reasons I should not go with the cheaper idler/pitman combo? Car is a 70 Cuda small block with power steering.
if you are running headers make sure the longer arms will clear them.
|
|
|
|
|
|