Re: 5.2 magnum Ignition upgrade. Maybe?
[Re: jordan91]
#1295318
09/02/12 09:47 AM
09/02/12 09:47 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
on a stock engine, there's not much need to upgrade to an MSD. now, if you have modified the engine with heads, cam, intake, spray, boost, etc. then sure, it might help you out some.
if your engine is stock, what I would do, is get a quality cap/rotor, a set of fire core 50 plug wires (yes, Rick makes them for the late model magnum engines, and they work well! my set has 10k miles on them, and still ohm at the same 50 ohms per foot as when I got them), and a set of stock replacement plugs.
you could also upgrade to the hotter MSD coil, but gains will be minimal, and you probably won't notice ANYTHING with the multi-spark MSD boxes other than a lighter wallet.
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 magnum Ignition upgrade. Maybe?
[Re: 70Cuda383]
#1295319
09/02/12 01:34 PM
09/02/12 01:34 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
I agree I dont think you'll get the improvement you are seeking. I'm not sure what ign/fuel systems a '98 uses but I would look elsewhere
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 magnum Ignition upgrade. Maybe?
[Re: jordan91]
#1295320
09/03/12 04:31 PM
09/03/12 04:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162 USA
360view
Moparts resident spammer
|
Moparts resident spammer
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
|
My guess would be that you will not see a fuel economy improvement, But I do remember reading a post about 14 years ago where someone with a 5.2 V8 Magnum in a Dakota said he got a MPG increase at highway cruise with an MSD. I also remember more than one post where MSD ignitions were blamed for burning up the internal Triac switch inside the PCM computer, which usually means the computer has to sent off for repair, which is expensive. The only automaker that i know of that has tried multi spark ignitions as standard equipment was Mercedes a couple years years ago. http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/officially-official-the-new-direct-injected-multi-spark-v6-an/Sample quote A new feature of this engine includes what Mercedes calls "multi-spark ignition" – new ignition coils that recharge much faster and putting out up to four sparks within one millisecond. Doing this can result in more controlled and complete combustion for lower emissions and consumption. Before i would try a MSD I would buy some of those tiny tip Irridium alloy spark plugs and see if 0.055 to 0.085 inch gaps would speed up combustion and act like an ignition timing increase. The Dodge truck Magnums are retarded about 12 degrees from MBT at wide open throttle so that they can run on 85 to 87 AKI octane rating gasoline. This MIGHT indicate faster combustion would help fuel economy. Another clue is that Dodge switched to longer projected nose spark plugs in later model years. When Jeep uprated their 1998 version of the 5.9V8 to run on 92 AKI octane they advanced the WOT ignition timing 12 degrees. The everyday driving part throttle ignition timing won't be retarded this many degrees. At part throttle highway cruise my 1995 Magnum 5.9 V8 ignition timing advance goes as high as 40 degrees when the manifold vacuum is around 13 inches of mercury. That's alot, but may be due to the EGR on that model year. If you are looking for an ignition mystery to solve on 5.2/5.9 Magnum V8s, Find out why the ceramic center tips on used spark plugs, Always appear noticeably whiter on cylinders 7 and 8 Than the other six cylinders.
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 magnum Ignition upgrade. Maybe?
[Re: 360view]
#1295322
09/03/12 10:33 PM
09/03/12 10:33 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,688 Alexandria,La.
BigTerry
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,688
Alexandria,La.
|
Quote:
If you are looking for an ignition mystery to solve on 5.2/5.9 Magnum V8s, Find out why the ceramic center tips on used spark plugs, Always appear noticeably whiter on cylinders 7 and 8 Than the other six cylinders.
I have noticed that on my 99 ram!5.2
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 magnum Ignition upgrade. Maybe?
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#1295325
09/04/12 10:46 AM
09/04/12 10:46 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
Quote:
Waste of money IMO. On an otherwise stock magnum, I don't think there are any mpg gains to be had with aftermarket spark boxes, fancy plugs or wires.
Quote:
if your engine is stock, what I would do, is get a quality cap/rotor, a set of fire core 50 plug wires
Needless on a stock engine. On a cammed 440 with a hotter ignition I noticed no difference from the cheapies I had on there previously to the firecores.
your opinion.
but in my opinion, EVERY engine needs a cap and rotor change now and then. it's routine maintenance. and a plug wire with less resistance will deliver more spark energy to the plug, allowing for a "hotter" spark, which can help improve combustion and efficiency. I've also noticed that Rick's wires do not degrade over time like many of the other plug wires on the market, especially the cheap "stock replacement" types. I've tried cheap generic plug wires and they work great for awhile, but will eventually start breaking down to the point where the engine developed a slight miss. So far, I've had Rick's wires for a few years on my truck, and I just Ohm checked them to see if they're breaking down at all...still got 50 ohms of resistance per foot.
and no, I'm not getting paid by rick or getting free product. I just feel they are the best plug wire on the market, and are worth the money.
I'll let the OP make up his own mind on what to get. On a budget? I've provided my reasoning on why I suggest them. On a budget? then buy cheap wires. looking to upgrade (as evidenced by the title of the thread) then buy an upgraded part.
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 magnum Ignition upgrade. Maybe?
[Re: jordan91]
#1295331
09/05/12 08:26 AM
09/05/12 08:26 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162 USA
360view
Moparts resident spammer
|
Moparts resident spammer
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
|
Several past posters on Magnum ignitions have mentioned that the distributor bushing should be checked for excessive wear when the cap and rotor is changed. If there is too much slack the timing accuracy begins to vary. After reading about how NASCAR engine builders who are limited to using distributors Customize the 8 metal posts inside the cap To advance some cylinders And retard others I have wondered if that would be a beneficial mod for a Magnum ignition? The Magnum crank position sensor tells the PCM computer when to fire the coil, But the circuit cannot complete until the post is near the rotor tip. I suspect that cylinders 7 and 8 need a bit of retard And cylinders 1 and 2 need a bit of advance. It might be better to do this by modifying the slots the cps sensor picks up on the flex plate between the engine and transmission But that requires a teardown.
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 magnum Ignition upgrade. Maybe?
[Re: 360view]
#1295333
09/07/12 08:27 PM
09/07/12 08:27 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
Quote:
On a slightly different Magnum ignition mod, Has anyone ever seen or read of trying to move the Magnum small bock crank position sensor away from its position where it reads the slots in the flexplate, And instead custom machine holes into the crank pulley at the front of the V8 and then have a relocated, but adjustable, crank position sensor read an equivalent signal there?
Instead of directly on the Magnum main pulley a disc could be attached to the front shaft near the main pulley similar to the way one of past MSD aftermarket ignitions used a disc with magnets imbedded at the disc's outer edge to trigger a sensor.
The main thing would be to add some advance / retard adjustment.
it sounds do-able, but unless you had a lathe/CNC machine to do the work yourself for cheap, I doubt it would be cost effective, when you could simply go with SCT to tweak the factory PCM -- if you have OBD-II fuel injection -- for much cheaper than all that custom fab work.
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 magnum Ignition upgrade. Maybe?
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#1295334
09/08/12 09:34 AM
09/08/12 09:34 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847 Oakdale CT
gdonovan
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847
Oakdale CT
|
Quote:
Who cares? Even the stuff you listed adds up to around 175 bucks by the time you figure in shipping and such. To me, that's still too much money to gamble on a maybe 1mpg increase.
Better to spend the money on a high flow muffler.
My 2WD Durango pulled 20.4 mpg going through Ohio with the cruise set for 70 mph.
It had a "high flow" intake and cone filter, slightly larger TB and a Hooker maxflow muffler.
If the ignition is in good shape your just wasting money.
|
|
|
|
|