Re: Atomic EFI Update
[Re: fuseable]
#1283556
08/12/12 01:55 AM
08/12/12 01:55 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003 Salem
Grizzly
Moparts Proctologist
|
Moparts Proctologist
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003
Salem
|
With all the great carb advice given on this site, it's tough to hear that a new injection system is online that works really well and gets a glowing review. The MPG's don't lie though........... May I ask why you altered the system and went with a return line? The Magnums have returnless fuel systems and they seem to work ok. Thanks for the review, been kind of wondering how this system was going to work.
Mo' Farts
Moderated by "tbagger".
|
|
|
Re: Atomic EFI Update
[Re: fuseable]
#1283561
08/12/12 02:24 PM
08/12/12 02:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068 Irving, TX
feets
Senior Management
|
Senior Management
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
|
It sounds like your carb tuning left quite a bit on the table. An EFI system won't make more power than a well tuned carb in most cases. What it will do is retune the engine for every atmospheric change. To get a jump in mileage like you did, there was an issue with the carb tuning.
I'm a big supporter of EFI and can't wait to install it on the Imperial. However, unless there are some major issues that I'm unaware of the mileage and performance won't change by a large amount.
The biggest benefits you get from EFI are the reliable starts, consistent performance, and a level of tune that simply feels that little bit better. That last one is hard to describe but it's there. The engine is a touch smoother, the exhaust sounds a wee bit better, the exhaust doesn't burn your eyes, and things like that.
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind. - Stu Harmon
|
|
|
Re: Atomic EFI Update
[Re: Grizzly]
#1283563
08/12/12 03:48 PM
08/12/12 03:48 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Quote:
May I ask why you altered the system and went with a return line? The Magnums have returnless fuel systems and they seem to work ok.
The magnums do have a return regulator, it's just installed at the gas tank. GM did similar with their ls engines. I don't know the reasoning for it, but it doesn't seem to cause a problem.
|
|
|
Re: Atomic EFI Update
[Re: demon]
#1283565
08/12/12 04:44 PM
08/12/12 04:44 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 771 Midwest
fuseable
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 771
Midwest
|
I can't really comment on the return less system, you could give it a try. I had to put a new tank on my car 5 years ago and I welded in a sump with a supply and return bung in it, before I installed it. That was another factor in not using the return less system as I was already set up to make a return system easily work. I live in the midwest and it gets HOT here in the summer (hell it's been hot everywhere this summer), if you go to the Atomic website and in the instructions there is a checklist to fill out to see if a return less system will suit your application. I really spent a lot of time and effort tuning my carburetor, I learned a lot about carburetors and how they function, I am sure a carb super guru could have done better, when I took the carb off it was running better than it had ever run, I mean it ran good. With the EFI it runs better than it ever did with the carb. If you can afford it I would go for it, I am in the process of selling off my carb, LM-1 Wide band, carb tuning parts, I hope to recoup 1/3 of my Atomic expense. You can sell off some parts if you like it and recoup some coin.
|
|
|
Re: Atomic EFI Update
[Re: John_Kunkel]
#1283568
08/13/12 12:46 PM
08/13/12 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 299 East Brunswick, NJ
finadk
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 299
East Brunswick, NJ
|
Mosey over to the Atomic forum and you'll find that not everybody's installation goes so well. http://www.atomicefi.com/forum.aspx?g=topics&f=12884901886I'm holding off for awhile.
I have been looking at the FAST EZ EFI nad the Atomic and settled on the Atomic EFI because of the Atomic's ability to control timing.
If you read through the forums on any of these systems you will find a broad range of expertise and abilities of the end customer. Many of the problems/complaints are related to user/installer errors. True there are some bad parts, but remember you are not marketing to EFI experts, you are selling to weekend mechanics, and I think the MSD is looking for an even less sophisticated market than even the FAST EZ EFI.
It would be nice if the manufacturers would post information on failure rates of components so that a buyer can make an informed decision. But I dont see that happening. Scott
Scott
1956 Dodge Custom Royal Lancer (408 Stroker, 4 Wheel Disc Brakes, Rack & Pinion, 6 speed)
2002 Dodge Ram 1500 Quad Cab
1976 Corvette
|
|
|
Re: Atomic EFI Update
[Re: jcc]
#1283570
08/13/12 07:00 PM
08/13/12 07:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938 Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
|
It has been my experience that all non-laptop self learning systems have issues with low vacuum engines. The ECUs look at vacuum to determine engine load and when the vacuum is jumping around 3 to 5 inches because of cam durations and low LSAs there's just not much you can do. All non-laptop systems need an idle vacuum of at least 8 inches. Laptop systems can handle this because you can manually do whatever the engine needs.
As far as failure rates - you have to admit that all electronics is pretty good. Barring any customer induced problem, it's not the electronics that fail, it's the mechanical parts. Number 1 failure is the fuel pump. And that's usually because they are installed poorly. Hot fuel can cause cavitation and any electric pump will fail if it's inlet flow is restricted.
Injectors almost never fail unless you get dirt in the system. Then they clog quickly, but that should never happen in a correct installation.
Next is mechanical relays. Sure they're cheap and easy to replace, but they are still mechanical. There are very few relays in a carburated engine. Lose a relay in an EFI engine and it dies.
Next is crank and cam sensors. Separate inductive or hall-Effect sensors (like a crank trigger) are great, but those distributors with multiple sensors are complicated and tend to be a failure mode. That's why all my cars use separate cam and crank sensors and no distributor at all.
Next is TPS and IAC sensors. Their failure rate is very low, well below the distributor level, but they still wear out.
Temp sensors never fail.
Do a good clean installation, pay attention to the instructions, and don't scrimp on the fuel system (good pump, filters and fuel line routing) and these things will run as long as any new car.
I'm very finicky about failures and I don't like distributors so all my cars are coil-on-plug. Now there is nothing left to fail expect the fuel pump which I'm sure it will.
|
|
|
|
|