Moparts

Atomic EFI Update

Posted By: fuseable

Atomic EFI Update - 08/11/12 07:25 PM

A couple of months back I installed the Atomic EFI setup on my 64 Dodge 330 with a 480 Cubic Inch Hemi in it. I built a return system for fuel supply instead of there return less system they offer with the kit. I am extremely satisfied with it. The throttle response is outstanding, much better than the 950 cfm Pro Systems carb I had on the car before, and it ran real good. Idle is great, car starts just like a new vehicle does, hit the key (without touching the gas), and it starts. And the cream on top, it went from 11 MPG on the highway to 15 MPG. I had a LM-1 wide band and I thought I had the carb tuned pretty good, but I was very happy with the 4 MPG gain. I have not checked the around town MPG yet, I will post when I do. All in all I think it might have been the best mod I have made to the car next to changing to HEMI power. If anyone is considering the Atomic I would say give it a try.

Attached picture 7331071-Atomic3002.JPG
Posted By: rapom

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/11/12 07:50 PM

Glad to get some feedback on how they run. Been thinking about buying one myself but I'm still balking at the cost.
Posted By: jcc

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/11/12 07:56 PM

That all sounds great. You said a couple of months ago installed, how many miles have you driven the car? I years ago installed 2 Holley EFI systems, they both ran GREAT, for 2 weeks, then kaput. I'm sorry, I've been burnt. Otherwise
Posted By: fuseable

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/11/12 08:04 PM

I have around 1000 miles on it so far.
Posted By: Dabee

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 04:49 AM

Thanks for the report I'm about ready to pull the trigger on one for Da Bee.

Posted By: Grizzly

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 05:55 AM

With all the great carb advice given on this site, it's tough to hear that a new injection system is online that works really well and gets a glowing review. The MPG's don't lie though...........

May I ask why you altered the system and went with a return line? The Magnums have returnless fuel systems and they seem to work ok.

Thanks for the review, been kind of wondering how this system was going to work.
Posted By: fuseable

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 01:36 PM

I wanted to get the benefits of a return system, cool fuel, (I used a Weldon Pump)fuel cooling the pump. It also occurred to me that 99.9% of factory EFI setups utilize a return system.
Posted By: 440forPOWER

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 01:44 PM

Thanks for the info. Does it seem to have the same power as it did with the 950?
Posted By: RUNCHARGER

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 04:16 PM

Thanks: That MPG is a big deal. $80 to fill up the Coronet does start to hurt and the ring life is bound to be much better. I'm thinking about a dual system on a Stage V manifold for my 572, there's getting to be lots of systems to choose from now.

Sheldon
Posted By: fuseable

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 05:22 PM

It seems like it has more power. It runs better in all aspects. For example I have a 727 in the car, I used to mash it at 40 MPH and it would go like hell, now it not only goes like hell but it brakes the tires loose to boot.
I have a 355 rear end gear in the car now, I wonder what kind of MPG I could get with a 5 speed?
Posted By: feets

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 06:24 PM

It sounds like your carb tuning left quite a bit on the table.
An EFI system won't make more power than a well tuned carb in most cases. What it will do is retune the engine for every atmospheric change.
To get a jump in mileage like you did, there was an issue with the carb tuning.

I'm a big supporter of EFI and can't wait to install it on the Imperial. However, unless there are some major issues that I'm unaware of the mileage and performance won't change by a large amount.

The biggest benefits you get from EFI are the reliable starts, consistent performance, and a level of tune that simply feels that little bit better. That last one is hard to describe but it's there. The engine is a touch smoother, the exhaust sounds a wee bit better, the exhaust doesn't burn your eyes, and things like that.
Posted By: fuseable

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 07:10 PM

The carb tuning may have left some on the table. When using the wide band I could never get all aspects of the carb tune good at the same time. I found to get a good idle tune you gave up some in the cruze tune, to get a good wide open throttle tune you gave up some in the cruze area, or the part throttle area, and vice a verse. I adjusted for 3 years always trying to get it better with a tweak here and an air bleed adj. there. What I always ended up with was a compromise of all ckt's of the carburetor tune. I think with the EFI it nails it in all areas. I am no expert but it is just my 2 cents.
Posted By: DaytonaTurbo

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 07:48 PM

Quote:


May I ask why you altered the system and went with a return line? The Magnums have returnless fuel systems and they seem to work ok.





The magnums do have a return regulator, it's just installed at the gas tank. GM did similar with their ls engines. I don't know the reasoning for it, but it doesn't seem to cause a problem.
Posted By: demon

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 08:10 PM

This is encouraging for me. I have researched different EFI systems and have pretty much decided to buy the MSD Atomic for my 528 Hemi.
Do you have any suggestions? I'm doing this on a Street driven 68 B body with a stock fuel tank, and plan to run a 3/8" steel line.
Posted By: fuseable

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 08:44 PM

I can't really comment on the return less system, you could give it a try. I had to put a new tank on my car 5 years ago and I welded in a sump with a supply and return bung in it, before I installed it. That was another factor in not using the return less system as I was already set up to make a return system easily work. I live in the midwest and it gets HOT here in the summer (hell it's been hot everywhere this summer), if you go to the Atomic website and in the instructions there is a checklist to fill out to see if a return less system will suit your application. I really spent a lot of time and effort tuning my carburetor, I learned a lot about carburetors and how they function, I am sure a carb super guru could have done better, when I took the carb off it was running better than it had ever run, I mean it ran good. With the EFI it runs better than it ever did with the carb. If you can afford it I would go for it, I am in the process of selling off my carb, LM-1 Wide band, carb tuning parts, I hope to recoup 1/3 of my Atomic expense. You can sell off some parts if you like it and recoup some coin.

Attached picture 7332354-Atomic3001.JPG
Posted By: John_Kunkel

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/12/12 10:22 PM

Quote:

With all the great carb advice given on this site, it's tough to hear that a new injection system is online that works really well and gets a glowing review.




Mosey over to the Atomic forum and you'll find that not everybody's installation goes so well.

http://www.atomicefi.com/forum.aspx?g=topics&f=12884901886

I'm holding off for awhile.
Posted By: feets

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/13/12 01:10 AM

Quote:

I adjusted for 3 years always trying to get it better with a tweak here and an air bleed adj. there. What I always ended up with was a compromise...




And THAT is the reason for EFI.


I'm glad it's working out for you.
Posted By: finadk

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/13/12 04:46 PM

Mosey over to the Atomic forum and you'll find that not everybody's installation goes so well.

http://www.atomicefi.com/forum.aspx?g=topics&f=12884901886

I'm holding off for awhile.




I have been looking at the FAST EZ EFI nad the Atomic and settled on the Atomic EFI because of the Atomic's ability to control timing.

If you read through the forums on any of these systems you will find a broad range of expertise and abilities of the end customer. Many of the problems/complaints are related to user/installer errors. True there are some bad parts, but remember you are not marketing to EFI experts, you are selling to weekend mechanics, and I think the MSD is looking for an even less sophisticated market than even the FAST EZ EFI.

It would be nice if the manufacturers would post information on failure rates of components so that a buyer can make an informed decision. But I dont see that happening.
Scott
Posted By: jcc

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/13/12 05:41 PM

Quote:


It would be nice if the manufacturers would post information on failure rates of components so that a buyer can make an informed decision. But I dont see that happening.
Scott



Start with the weather man telling us how often he is right
Posted By: Mopar_Rich

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 08/13/12 11:00 PM

It has been my experience that all non-laptop self learning systems have issues with low vacuum engines. The ECUs look at vacuum to determine engine load and when the vacuum is jumping around 3 to 5 inches because of cam durations and low LSAs there's just not much you can do. All non-laptop systems need an idle vacuum of at least 8 inches. Laptop systems can handle this because you can manually do whatever the engine needs.

As far as failure rates - you have to admit that all electronics is pretty good. Barring any customer induced problem, it's not the electronics that fail, it's the mechanical parts. Number 1 failure is the fuel pump. And that's usually because they are installed poorly. Hot fuel can cause cavitation and any electric pump will fail if it's inlet flow is restricted.

Injectors almost never fail unless you get dirt in the system. Then they clog quickly, but that should never happen in a correct installation.

Next is mechanical relays. Sure they're cheap and easy to replace, but they are still mechanical. There are very few relays in a carburated engine. Lose a relay in an EFI engine and it dies.

Next is crank and cam sensors. Separate inductive or hall-Effect sensors (like a crank trigger) are great, but those distributors with multiple sensors are complicated and tend to be a failure mode. That's why all my cars use separate cam and crank sensors and no distributor at all.

Next is TPS and IAC sensors. Their failure rate is very low, well below the distributor level, but they still wear out.

Temp sensors never fail.

Do a good clean installation, pay attention to the instructions, and don't scrimp on the fuel system (good pump, filters and fuel line routing) and these things will run as long as any new car.

I'm very finicky about failures and I don't like distributors so all my cars are coil-on-plug. Now there is nothing left to fail expect the fuel pump which I'm sure it will.
Posted By: Fury Fan

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 09/21/12 04:48 PM

Quote:

The carb tuning may have left some on the table. When using the wide band I could never get all aspects of the carb tune good at the same time. I found to get a good idle tune you gave up some in the cruze tune, to get a good wide open throttle tune you gave up some in the cruze area, or the part throttle area, and vice a verse. I adjusted for 3 years always trying to get it better with a tweak here and an air bleed adj. there. What I always ended up with was a compromise of all ckt's of the carburetor tune. I think with the EFI it nails it in all areas. I am no expert but it is just my 2 cents.




And this is the issue with carbs. Average carb guy sets for smoothness, clean plugs, non-stinky-rich exhaust, then tweaks for more power. Unless he has a WB, he has no idea that his carb is compromising in one area of another. EFI not only offers significantly greater adjustability, but it monitors and adjusts itself too.
Posted By: Fury Fan

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 09/21/12 05:02 PM

Quote:

Quote:


May I ask why you altered the system and went with a return line? The Magnums have returnless fuel systems and they seem to work ok.





The magnums do have a return regulator, it's just installed at the gas tank. GM did similar with their ls engines. I don't know the reasoning for it, but it doesn't seem to cause a problem.



Most 'new' OEM EFI systems are returnless (from perhaps 2002 and up?).
  • If you put a regulator at the rear, you just saved the cost of the return plumbing (which is a big savings at OEM level).
  • However, if you add a PWM controller to the engine ECU, you can now alter pump speed/output to match engine needs, with savings of regulator cost, albeit with some expense of PWM circuitry.
  • Another benefit of the returnless system is that you aren't constantly cycling excess fuel thru the fuel rails, heating it up, and returnign it to the tank (thereby taxing the Evap system). Remember that the volume of fuel cycled is highest when engine load is lowest, and most street vehicles spend most time at low load (as compared to WOT). I have heard of some hotrodder guys with return-type EFI systems 'boiling' fuel in the tank and cooking their fuel pumps on the multi-hour Power Tour-type drives.


At teh OEM level, returnless is a win-win.
Posted By: Dragula

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 09/21/12 05:19 PM

The EZ-efi from FAST is a good system, but Rich is correct about the low vacuum sensativity. If your not pulling at least 10" on vacuum at idle, it will not hit the target A/F until it get what it considers full vacuum...I have fought with this issue myself, and sometimes miss what you can do with a fully progamable open system. My solution was a custom curved distributer that has more timing at idle than a factory one.

The other issue with the Mopars seems to be cold starts. I have also had this issue when you first fire it up and it dies unless you have your foot on it...When I talked with Rich, he had a neat idea. Run the fuel pressure higher than 43lbs, but leave the computer thinking it was still at 43lbs. In essence your giving the motor a bigger start up shot of fuel until the computer see's the O2 reading.

I have done this, and it works pretty well, unless you hit the gas hard while its still cold, you can actually flood the engine for an instant and stall it...The other extreme.

And as stated, follow the instructions!

The other issue is more of an annouyence really during start-up, you have to push a few buttons to have the read out actually show anything other than "Comm Error"....It should just boot to the main live screen.
Posted By: HotRodDave

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 09/23/12 10:50 PM

Pretty much all new cars are returnless now, it is done for emmisions control and MPG. The fuel in the tank won't get heated and evaporate nearly as fast. This will also make the fuel last longer (time wise) as all the lighter molecules stay in the tank longer instead of leaving the mix and leaving heavy long chain hard to burn molecules. You will also get better mpg because the fuel is now hotter when injected so it evaporates in the intake and obviously since your fuel in your tank is not evaporateing you get more of it into the engine over the course of useing the tank.

Now for drag raceing it (a return system)could be usefull to build a couple more HP, especially with a throttle body injection. The fuel will be continually cooling the throttle body (while running) and that will cool the air/fuel mix in the manifold and allow more molecules to be packed into the cylinder and could also help with detonation if you are running borderline fuel octane for your engine.
Posted By: DynoDave

Re: Atomic EFI Update - 09/25/12 02:11 AM

Quote:

The fuel in the tank won't get heated and evaporate nearly as fast. This will also make the fuel last longer (time wise) as all the lighter molecules stay in the tank longer instead of leaving the mix and leaving heavy long chain hard to burn molecules. You will also get better mpg because the fuel is now hotter when injected so it evaporates in the intake and obviously since your fuel in your tank is not evaporateing you get more of it into the engine over the course of useing the tank.




Any reason a person could use a fuel cooler on the return line, like some diesels (Duramax) do?
© 2024 Moparts Forums