Lately, I've been wanting to add some hidden circuit protection on the original main power feed from the alternator on my '64 Belvedere. However, hiding a high amp circuit breaker near the alternator has proven to be difficult. I've looked at Maxi-fuses and the larger, marine-style circuit breakers. Both are kinda big and hard to hide.
I've added an additional wire from the alternator to the starter relay to reduce the load on the bulkhead connector, and that wire incorporates a fusible link. But the original doesn't have a fusible link, and I really don't want to cut the engine harness to add one unless I absolutely have to.
So last night, this idea popped into my head: Adding a manually reset circuit breaker to the original power feed that mounts to the ampmeter in the dash. It would be easy to hide behind the dash, and I'm thinking a lower amp (20 amp??) circuit breaker would power the interior circuits, but "pop" fairly quickly (protecting the bulkhead connector and interior wiring) if there is an electrical short of some kind.
http://order.waytekwire.com/CGI-BIN/LANSAWEB?WEBEVENT+L0F22512A4DF39600181A091+M37+ENGDecent, but not great, idea? Bad idea? Obviously, the circuit breaker is a long way from the alternator, which isn't good. But I wanted to see what everyone thought about this.
If adding a fusible link the original power feed is the only acceptable answer, would two fusible links "in parallel" (original power feed and add-on power feed) blow quick enough to protect the wiring? I'm planning to swap to a 90-amp Denso alternator this winter, but want some kind of protection in place before I do that.