Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B #1137507
12/17/11 01:30 AM
12/17/11 01:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,120
MassHole Central
rtman Offline OP
super stock
rtman  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,120
MassHole Central
Just put AFCO XHD springs on now, car sits high in rear (too high to my eye). Will MP OEM HD springs lower the rear end?

6970622-PC160021.jpg (102 downloads)
Last edited by rtman; 12/17/11 01:34 AM.
Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: rtman] #1137508
12/17/11 01:34 AM
12/17/11 01:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,120
MassHole Central
rtman Offline OP
super stock
rtman  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,120
MassHole Central
Dayclona?

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: rtman] #1137509
12/17/11 01:43 AM
12/17/11 01:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,874
Upstate, NY
sixpack4spd Offline
master
sixpack4spd  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,874
Upstate, NY
Yuck, and I thought mine sat too high. Did you tighten everything up with the car in the air? You should put it together with the bolts loose (on the springs and shackles) and don't tighten them up until the car is on the ground. Sometimes the rubber bushings will bind and make the car sit higher than it should. Have you driven the car with the springs on it?

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: sixpack4spd] #1137510
12/17/11 01:58 AM
12/17/11 01:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
Quote:

Yuck, and I thought mine sat too high. Did you tighten everything up with the car in the air? You should put it together with the bolts loose (on the springs and shackles) and don't tighten them up until the car is on the ground. Sometimes the rubber bushings will bind and make the car sit higher than it should. Have you driven the car with the springs on it?






Just what I was going to post ....I had the same issue upon XHD installs, too high, but do as listed above and take it out for some driving time it will settle down, might take a few miles of suspenion rebounding to settle them out, the XHD in my Charger came down about 1 1/2" after a week or so

Mike

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: rtman] #1137511
12/17/11 02:07 AM
12/17/11 02:07 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Like the others say...tighten everything up while
its at curb height... also the thing with HD springs
is, it seems like all they do is put more arch in them
instead of making them with a higher pounds per inch
of travel

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: rtman] #1137512
12/17/11 08:25 AM
12/17/11 08:25 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,468
Answering the call of the wild
T
ThermoQuad Offline
top fuel
ThermoQuad  Offline
top fuel
T

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,468
Answering the call of the wild
Be careful on some of the "advice" given here on moparts. Please consult the factory service manual as to the proper procedure to tighten the rear suspension bolts.

MP HD springs are made in mexico and have quality issues.

You can effectively and safely lower the car by flipping the front spring hanger or better yet buying an adjustable one from Firm Feel. Do not use lowering blocks!

You may have too much spring rate with the xhd springs but that is a technicality at this point as i have no clue how big your wallet is.

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: ThermoQuad] #1137513
12/17/11 09:21 AM
12/17/11 09:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
Agree its worth putting a couple hundred miles on the new springs. They will "settle" a little. I double checked the FSM and as several have posted, the spring bolts should be torqued with the weight of the vehicle on the springs.

I am runing the MOPAR XHD's. By design they are kinda low plus they seem like they drop more (sag) over time. Unless they have been improved, better to work with the ones you have. After some breakin if they are too high, consider taking them to a spring shop to get de-arched a little.

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: ahy] #1137514
12/17/11 12:40 PM
12/17/11 12:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,120
MassHole Central
rtman Offline OP
super stock
rtman  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,120
MassHole Central
These are AFCO 20231XHD. I drove it in with a used set of springs I bought off a board member. I may put those back on until I sort this out. I went with the AFCO XHDs when I read a post saying the MP repro OEM springs were Mexican junk and read a post by Dayclona recommending the AFCOs.

Later on I can consider messing with stuff like flipping the hangars or de-archuing the AFCOs. I think Jegs said they had a 5" arch. Can anyone confirm that?

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: rtman] #1137515
12/17/11 04:54 PM
12/17/11 04:54 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

These are AFCO 20231XHD. I drove it in with a used set of springs I bought off a board member. I may put those back on until I sort this out. I went with the AFCO XHDs when I read a post saying the MP repro OEM springs were Mexican junk and read a post by Dayclona recommending the AFCOs.

Later on I can consider messing with stuff like flipping the hangars or de-archuing the AFCOs. I think Jegs said they had a 5" arch. Can anyone confirm that?




Yep! 5" reference arch, car weight 3100-to-3500lbs, actual arch 6 5/8". Info at THIS LINK

Glad you bring this up. Heard some dissaponted with the MP XHDs. There are many options on the market for reproduction style XHD springs. What's the best rout to go?

New XHD "reporductions":

AFCO - www.afcoracing.com

ESPO - http://www.springsnthings.com

EATON Detroit Spring, Inc. - http://www.eatonsprings.com

Stock XHD spring rebuild kits:

Roger Gibson - http://www.rogergibsonautorestoration.com/index.htm

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: CompSyn] #1137516
12/18/11 01:49 PM
12/18/11 01:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,103
Phila Pa
S
scatpacktom Offline
master
scatpacktom  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,103
Phila Pa
You can't flip the front spring hanger, they only fit the car one way. The top studs are closer together then the bottom.

Be careful about some of the "advice" you get from board members.

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: rtman] #1137517
12/18/11 02:16 PM
12/18/11 02:16 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
If they are still too high after setteling, find a local spring shop to de-arch them.

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: scatpacktom] #1137518
12/19/11 12:16 AM
12/19/11 12:16 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Mattax Offline
top fuel
Mattax  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
People do flip them by slotting the holes. I don't like it. I don't recommend it without reinforcing etc but people do it. AR makes multiposition front hangers and others have custom made their own.

It would be amusing if it wasn't so sad what the aftermarket sells as replacement parts. A look at the factory parts manual shows that Chrysler had many rear spring variations to match the various vehicles and option packages. For mass produced replacement springs, my experience has been with Triangle and Stanley Parts. The latter made a very good quality copy of the later FSJ springs. Number of leafs, lengths, thicknessess all correct with heavy formed clamps. Came through a regular supplyhouse. I have not yet followed up to see what they may have for our cars. I had Triangle's springs on the 'cuda. Nothing special replacement springs.

I am using circle track springs right now, but I also weighed the car front and rear, measured the old spring rates and ride heights and then did the calculations to get what I wanted. Not really what i would do for a street driver or restoration.

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: 451Mopar] #1137519
12/19/11 07:44 PM
12/19/11 07:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 43
IN
E
EricatAFCO Offline
member
EricatAFCO  Offline
member
E

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 43
IN
Quote:

If they are still too high after setteling, find a local spring shop to de-arch them.




Guys, I would support the statements that leaf springs will settle some initially. The amount depends on weight of vehicle (on the rear tires) and rate of the spring. I too am not a fan of lowering blocks for street (and strip) use so if the car ends up sitting too high, consider taking to a local spring shop for some TLC to "adjust" the springs to your liking.

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: EricatAFCO] #1137520
12/20/11 12:26 PM
12/20/11 12:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,120
MassHole Central
rtman Offline OP
super stock
rtman  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,120
MassHole Central
Eric, do you have the measurements (eye to center, eye to eye) for my AFCO springs? Thanks.

Re: OEM HD Springs vs. AFCO XHD Springs - '72 B [Re: rtman] #1137521
12/20/11 01:53 PM
12/20/11 01:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 43
IN
E
EricatAFCO Offline
member
EricatAFCO  Offline
member
E

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 43
IN
No problem. The spring measurements are as follows: center of eye to eye is 52 7/8". To measure from front eye to pin, we need to pull a string from center of eye to eye, then meausure from center of front eye along the string directly above the pin-don't follow the arch. This will give us our true measurements.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1