another roller cam post
#1088651
10/05/11 03:00 AM
10/05/11 03:00 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,179 California
mickm
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,179
California
|
ok, so i'm putting together a new engine for the road runner. everyone is saying go roller. but i drive my car, a LOT, and it has only seen the track a few times. i'm looking for that balance of power vs. drivability, and want to err on the side of drivability. the basic combo i'm putting together could generate a lot more horsepower with a more radical cam, but then i would give up the drivability. it's a stock road runner body, so close to 4k lbs, and it's a stick.
so here's the thing. going with a roller gets more performance, and of course no issues of wiping cam lobes because of the lack of zinc and the proper additives in modern oil. yes, there are plenty of good choices of oil out there, but it happens, a lot, these days.
but wiping a lobe on a flat tappet and having a roller lifter come apart are two completely different things. most of the time, a bad lobe just means rebuilding the engine, new rings and bearings. a roller disintegrating can do a hell of a lot more damage.
i should add that i know most rollers fail because of the insane spring pressures to match the aggressive grinds, but the setup i'll be using is a hydraulic roller grind with solid roller lifters. so the grind isn't that aggressive, uses fairly standard springs, and yet is stout enough to give more than a flat tappet will.
so for a street engine that sees a pretty reasonable amount of miles, a few long trips a year, and my foot to the floor at every opportunity, what do you recommend? should i go roller or just stick with a flat tappet?
Last edited by mickm; 10/05/11 03:03 AM.
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: mickm]
#1088652
10/05/11 03:21 AM
10/05/11 03:21 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486 SoCal
Brian Hafliger
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486
SoCal
|
My vote is for the flat tappet.
Brian Hafliger
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: mickm]
#1088654
10/05/11 03:37 AM
10/05/11 03:37 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 373 sandwich IL
sublimehemi
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 373
sandwich IL
|
i just orderderd the camshaft that was in the hemi book written by rich needbal.....its a hot street roller and i am using the new comp elites solid lifters.....but if u can use isky ez red zone in your block no needle bearings in those...dont think they would fit my world block?anyways the one in the book is cut on a 114 lobe seperation for efi..which i am using
Last edited by sublimehemi; 10/05/11 03:43 AM.
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: viperblue72]
#1088656
10/05/11 05:39 AM
10/05/11 05:39 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,384 Worst Weather USA
493_DART
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,384
Worst Weather USA
|
Mick-- Do yourself a favor. call Hughes Engines They are Mopar only. Mopar designed cams. Great dudes. Yes -i have a Hughes flat tappet. Yes--Im more than happy with my non- roller
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: mickm]
#1088657
10/05/11 08:19 AM
10/05/11 08:19 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,385 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,385
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Roller. If you're not a cheap azz and use good parts, you won't have any problems.
I wouldn't use a flat tappet in anything unless I absolutely had to.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#1088658
10/05/11 08:57 AM
10/05/11 08:57 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 492 South Jersey, NJ
DragDart360
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 492
South Jersey, NJ
|
Every new car being manufactured has a roller cam and there not coming apart at 10K miles. Why would you use a solid lifter on a street car?
70 Dart Swinger, 2850 lbs SB 408, Bullet roller 264/268 @50 .636 SSDS stage 2 Edelbrock heads, 1 7/8 Headmans, 1050 dominator by Dom, 9.867 @ 133
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: viperblue72]
#1088659
10/05/11 09:12 AM
10/05/11 09:12 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,178 Indy
FlyFish
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,178
Indy
|
Quote:
If you don't mind checking everything, lifters, spring pressures, bronze gear every 3500 miles then go for the solid roller as long as it isn't crazy aggressive. I ran an xe286 solid roller in my 408 that was daily driven. I checked everything at 5k miles and everything was still excellent. Wiping a cam lobe can do a lot of damage. Cylinder walls scuffed bearings and crank wipe out. I had to do a complete rebuild on an engine that wiped out a cam.
I should add that I had 13.5in. Vacuum at idle with the solid roller and the powerband. Was much wider than with a flat tappet.
I have this exact same cam in my 410 stroker...also a street car with 10.8:1 compression. Very streetable and runs 6.86 @ 99mph That is my vote.
67 Barracuda street car, 408, e85, 1.38 60', 6.44 @105.9 in the 1/8 mile, 10.19 @130.5 in the 1/4...so far....
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: mickm]
#1088661
10/05/11 10:25 AM
10/05/11 10:25 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544 Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
|
Your " criteria" is a perfect one for a hydraulic roller cam. I would run hydraulic roller lifters. I would NOT be afraid of running a solid cam. Break it in properly, make sure lifter bores are of acceptable size for lifter rotation, and there is nothing to worry about. Contrary to all the internet hype, most solid cams failures are done within the first 5 mintues, regardless of what they " think" has happened. Solid cam is fine, especially if you have a stock block, with lifter bores that are probably more than a thousandths over size anyhow, plenty of oil splashing around in there. Stay with a non aggressive lobe, and they live fine on the street. BTW, although SOME roller lifter failures are definately from over springed or aggressive lobes, most of the street lifters that fail are from over revving, too aggressive of lobe or the lifters bouncing or lofting off the cam. Maybe even too LITTLE spring pressure and un-forseen driving habits.. Many times its simply a bad choice of parts for the application that kills them. By nature, roller lifters are pretty darn good.
RIP Monte Smith
Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.
WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: mickm]
#1088663
10/05/11 10:56 AM
10/05/11 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
I'll be running a solid roller on the street... its not a real big roller and I plan to keep the revs down to 7000 rpm(this is a 416ci) so with the rev a bit lower than I usually like I went with some lighter springs but I believe will be fine... they are 240 at seat and 640 open on a .640 lift cam
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: 493_DART]
#1088664
10/05/11 11:16 AM
10/05/11 11:16 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 834 Beavercreek, Ohio
OA5599
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 834
Beavercreek, Ohio
|
Quote:
Mick-- Do yourself a favor.
call Hughes Engines
They are Mopar only. Mopar designed cams. Great dudes.
Yes -i have a Hughes flat tappet. Yes--Im more than happy with my non- roller
Hughes suggested a solid flat for our stroker SB. Very streetable, and great performance. I was prepared to spend the extra $$$ on a roller, and they talked me out of it. Glad they did. I am very happy with the cam they selected for our combo.
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1088665
10/05/11 11:24 AM
10/05/11 11:24 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
I run a solid flat tappet speced by Dwayne Porter. One of the reasons I did not go roller is because I put alot of miles on my 63 and to run a roller correctly it will need alot of spring pressure as required. Rollers need the high spring pressure for a few reasons but one reason is they dont want any lifter floating (bouncing) as they can cause a roller lifter to get damaged and if the roller lifter goes it is usually major eng problems. Many new cars run rollers sure but they are not set up to be raced at 6000 rpm as they can get away with a bit less spring pressure then the roller racing cams. So I was recomended to replace my roller lifters every 3000 miles if I drive my car alot of street miles just for insurance that a roller lifter cant lose a roller pin or break any other way. I do know alot of guys do run rollers on the street but since I drive mine alot I did not want to worry about breaking a lifter so I went with this solid flat tappet that is: 264 and 270 @ .050 with .630 and .628 lift with my 1.6 rockers. It is on a 110 LSA and I installed it at 106 ICL. I myself love it as it has a nice tuff rump rump to the idle but is smooth enough to drive it all the time. Just the way I like it. My 63 goes 3700 lbs and ran 11.04 on the only good pass I have on it. But I know it should go well into the 10's as it was breaking up that run from being to lean. Thats just something to thing about and good luck which ever you choose. Ron
Last edited by 383man; 10/05/11 11:25 AM.
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: 383man]
#1088667
10/05/11 11:50 AM
10/05/11 11:50 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,179 California
mickm
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,179
California
|
my combo will definitely handle the roller, beehive springs and ~6k on the revs. a rev limiter will keep it from going too far and so bouncing lifters off of the lobe.
it's funny but as usual, there are solid arguments both ways here.
as far as the cam choice, i'll be sticking with tim at FHO, as all the parts are from him. it is more or less one of his engines, i'm just gathering all the other pieces and assembling it myself, so i'm going to stick with his recommendation either way.
i have emphasized to him many times that what i'm after is drivability and lack of maintenance. i don't want to have to tear it apart in 3500 miles to check the lifters, i want to drive it.
with the package he runs, this hydraulic grind with solid lifters, he has assured me that as long as the valve lash is kept right, this will fit the bill: best performance for the buck, still being street-able, and maintenance free. (more or less, adjusting the valves periodically, but i don't mind that at all).
the one thing that really gets me is that there seems to be a higher than desired failure rate among lifters these days. don't know if that is the case or just perceived, but even tim is looking around at different lifters.
anyway, i'm still undecided. thanks for all the input, i'll post which way i go in the end.
|
|
|
Re: another roller cam post
[Re: mickm]
#1088668
10/05/11 12:06 PM
10/05/11 12:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,616 Kissimmee Fl.
dusturbd340W5
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,616
Kissimmee Fl.
|
street or race i will never run anything but a roller weather it is a solid or a hyd.Just look at modern cars running hyd rollers and going tons of miles. My GMC has 161000 miles and it is still on the factory rollers.
70 duster full chassis super pro 416 CNC Indybrock heads 727 w/brake
best so far 1.212 60 6.219 in 1/8 at 110.88 9.768 at 137.81 1/4
|
|
|
|
|