Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan #1000492
05/26/11 09:07 PM
05/26/11 09:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,145
ontario calif
N
ns1aar Offline OP
super stock
ns1aar  Offline OP
super stock
N

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,145
ontario calif
I need the pros and cons of each.Fit finish correctness


NS1AAR
Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: ns1aar] #1000493
05/26/11 10:55 PM
05/26/11 10:55 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,239
Kentucky
S
Sasquatch4406 Offline
pro stock
Sasquatch4406  Offline
pro stock
S

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,239
Kentucky
im using AMD on my car, though it isnt installed yet all ive heard is praise when it comes their parts. AMD metal is mopar restortation certified, or at least my dart parts were.

Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: Sasquatch4406] #1000494
05/26/11 10:59 PM
05/26/11 10:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,462
Mrytle Beach SC
J
johnscudashop Offline
pro stock
johnscudashop  Offline
pro stock
J

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,462
Mrytle Beach SC
I just installed a AMD inner fender and upper cowl on my 71 cuda. The fit and finish is definitly better than the goodmark peices I used in the past.

6652864-100_2193.jpg (131 downloads)
Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: johnscudashop] #1000495
05/26/11 11:00 PM
05/26/11 11:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,462
Mrytle Beach SC
J
johnscudashop Offline
pro stock
johnscudashop  Offline
pro stock
J

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,462
Mrytle Beach SC
other picture

6652866-100_2192.jpg (110 downloads)
Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: johnscudashop] #1000496
05/27/11 02:45 PM
05/27/11 02:45 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,106
Ridgeland Wi
M
mopars_1 Offline
master
mopars_1  Offline
master
M

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,106
Ridgeland Wi
heres a picture of my floor pans for my 71 roadrunner from AMD. they basically droped right in place, no 'messageing' needed. previous pans from goodmark.. =

6653644-100_0584.jpg (95 downloads)

1971 Plymouth Duster 340 auto
1937 Plymouth PT50
1969 Dodge Dart Swinger 340 4 speed
2013 Ram laramie 2500 hemi
2008 Harley FLSTSB springer
Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: mopars_1] #1000497
05/27/11 03:04 PM
05/27/11 03:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,666
South Dakota
hotairballoonpilot Offline
master
hotairballoonpilot  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,666
South Dakota
If it means anything. A friend who runs a body shop bought a set of mustang fenders from goodmark. sent them back and got fenders from keystone that were worlds better than goodmark. If they can't get ford parts rights what makes them think they can get mopar correct? Just my .02 but then I can sell amd and use them any chance I get.

corey


Contact Me about AMD Prices
Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: hotairballoonpilot] #1000498
05/27/11 03:09 PM
05/27/11 03:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 490
Boston Ma
Hamtramck Offline
mopar
Hamtramck  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 490
Boston Ma
Goodmark dug their own grave. Figured they were the only game in town and thereby didnt care about quality or customers.


69 roadrunner conv. 4spd B5/X9
Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: Hamtramck] #1000499
05/27/11 04:20 PM
05/27/11 04:20 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,336
Ball Ground, Georgia
Dixie Offline
top fuel
Dixie  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,336
Ball Ground, Georgia
Quote:

Goodmark dug their own grave. Figured they were the only game in town and thereby didnt care about quality or customers.




Unfortunately, is seems that way. We have decided to carry AMD only going forward.

Perhaps the new owners/management at Goodmark have a different perspective on business.


Dixie Restoration Parts
Phone -(770) 975-9898
Phone Hours: M-F 10am-5pm EST
website: www.dixierestorationparts.com
email: mail@dixierestorationparts.com
Veteran owned small business

The Best Parts at a Fair Price.
Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: ns1aar] #1000500
05/28/11 12:07 PM
05/28/11 12:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 180
Chicagoland
cudastruction Offline
member
cudastruction  Offline
member

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 180
Chicagoland
I used a Goodmark full trunk pan with AMD trunk extensions and rear quarters and had no major issues. Each part took a little massaging/trimming. I can't comment on the AMD trunk pan because I did not have one or use one. This was on a 71 cuda.

Al

Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: ns1aar] #1000501
06/01/11 08:15 AM
06/01/11 08:15 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20
Dallas, PA
E
Eric_70_Chally Offline
member
Eric_70_Chally  Offline
member
E

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20
Dallas, PA
I'm using a goodmark full trunk floor with amd outer wheel and extensions. The floor is a good fit. The back lip (where it folds up over the rear tail panel) is alittle shorter than the ooriginal, but noting to worry about. Its enough to weld. It also seems to be missing two holes on the outer edges of the shock humps, and I had to punch the shock hump holes myself.
As far as the amd parts, the right side fit so well, they damn near fell in by themselves. The left needed a little 'love' from my body hammer.

...All on my 70 challenger rt...
Cheers,
Eric


1970 Challenger R/T U-Code (Restoration in process!)
Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: Eric_70_Chally] #1000502
06/01/11 07:27 PM
06/01/11 07:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 180
Chicagoland
cudastruction Offline
member
cudastruction  Offline
member

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 180
Chicagoland
I had a similar experience with the left side as well.

Al

Re: AMD VS Goodmark 70 cuda trunk pan [Re: cudastruction] #1000503
06/01/11 08:06 PM
06/01/11 08:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline
EL Master
domingo  Offline
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
odmark floor pans are thinner gauge, probably the same as the factory floor pans.

AMD floor pans are definetly thicker gauge. I dont think thats a bad thing though!

AMD ribs are more crisp, Goodmarks are more "washed off".

However Goodmark pans are like half the price, and I wouldnt say they are bad at all. They are defintely very useable.

Having said that, Id go for AMD on nicer cars....Id use Goodmark on somthing I want to do right but dont want to spend much on because its a run of the mill car.

Now, when talking about exterior sheemetal like fenders, quarters, decklids, etc. AMD is pretty good for being repro parts....you wont be getting any better anyplace else. You want better, buy NOS and be ready to sell a kidney to be able to afford it.

Goodmark exterior sheetmetal Stay away!!! ITS JUNK!!!







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1