Quote: To all those who understood what I said, thank you. To all those who didn't understand but then gave examples proving true what I said, thanks.
What about my example proving you wrong? My cam was designed to operate between 2500 and 5500 rpm. I should know. I worked with Comp Cams to design it. The car got MUCH better mileage at 2300 to 2400 rpm than anywhere above that. The higher you revved the worse the mileage got. It's called DRAG. The engine may be more efficient at WOT but that changes at part throttle. My computer says I was using 12% throttle opening to hold 2400 rpm. Unlike some of these guys, my hot rod was instrumented nicely.
Now, unless you can come up with evidence that I am wrong in my example or that I was using alien technology to invalidate the laws of physics, please leave my thread. You have made yourself unwelcome in this topic through your behavior and mockery of others.
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind. - Stu Harmon
