Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: JohnRR]
#926007
02/12/11 02:25 AM
02/12/11 02:25 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347 Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT
Management Trainee
|
Management Trainee
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
|
Quote:
Quote:
Do your RESEARCH on ALL of these routes (ideas)for more compression. Then decide which is feasible to you in effectively giving the compression you need for the LEAST amount of cash outlay.
it's going to end up costing alot whether he gets a diamond or a flat top KB , with the KB you have to cut more off the block and the heads because of that canyon ...
Which is why I think a stroker makes so much sense... zero deck & decent C/R are easy to achieve, you actually need the flow good heads will provide & I wouldn't be surprised if it costs less than trying to accomplish the same quench & C/R with a stock stroke in a 383....
|
|
|
Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: RapidRobert]
#926012
02/12/11 10:03 AM
02/12/11 10:03 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647 IL
71383beep
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
|
I am using the 162's with a fair amount of block decking and upsized 516s. The CR is an actual 9.2:1 with the felpro gasket. With a street dom intake and 650 mighty demon and the nostalgia plus .474 cam she is dyno'd at 396/430. It runs great so yes you can get the 162's to work.
'73 GK6 Challenger Rallye - 340 4-Speed
|
|
|
Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: ireland383]
#926014
02/12/11 01:09 PM
02/12/11 01:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 587 IL . usa
cjs69mope
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 587
IL . usa
|
The KB 400 is a dome top i told you this in the first post earlier . I slapped together my dads 383 with the kb 400 edelbrock heads ,rpm intake ,comp cams 275 hl .525 cam and the cheapest headman headers summit sells . The car is a 68 charger with 727 trans and 3000 stall from PTC with 3:55 sure grip . I put a out of the box Holley 750 hp vacuum secondary , never tuned anything except the normal carb and timing adjustments . I think i built the engine under 3 grand and the performace is awesome the car is a fun street car with unbelievable top end power . IF you build it like this you will be happy ! you will be able to burn the tires with out brake tourqeing at will . I would not buy the 162 pistion unless you want to take alot off the deck and heads . to get 9.0 to one compression ! the kb 400 will easy get 10to1 .
1969 Dodge Charger
1969 Dodge Superbee
|
|
|
Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: JoesMopar]
#926018
02/13/11 10:34 AM
02/13/11 10:34 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326 A gulag near you.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
|
Quote:
Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.
My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.
What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?
|
|
|
Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: HYPER8oSoNic]
#926019
02/13/11 10:37 AM
02/13/11 10:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326 A gulag near you.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Do your RESEARCH on ALL of these routes (ideas)for more compression. Then decide which is feasible to you in effectively giving the compression you need for the LEAST amount of cash outlay.
it's going to end up costing alot whether he gets a diamond or a flat top KB , with the KB you have to cut more off the block and the heads because of that canyon ...
There are other avenues of approach to get to the anticipated compression ratio, than just the pistons.
That goes without saying, but a better designed piston makes the other avenues less costly.
|
|
|
Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: JohnRR]
#926020
02/13/11 11:31 AM
02/13/11 11:31 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,782 USA
JoesMopar
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,782
USA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.
My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.
What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?
I think you know more about it than I do, but I was thinking 9.5-1?
|
|
|
Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: JoesMopar]
#926021
02/13/11 12:16 PM
02/13/11 12:16 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347 Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT
Management Trainee
|
Management Trainee
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.
My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.
What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?
I think you know more about it than I do, but I was thinking 9.5-1?
That number is obtainable but the thing is the aluminum heads pull so much heat out of the combustion chamber you really need another ,5-1.0 points of compression to start taking advantage of them....
"The Armies of our ancestors were lucky, in that they were not trailed by a second army of pencil pushers."
|
|
|
Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: JoesMopar]
#926025
02/13/11 02:29 PM
02/13/11 02:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326 A gulag near you.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.
My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.
What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?
I think you know more about it than I do, but I was thinking 9.5-1?
The specs you give above ASSuMEing a 4.280 bore , 6cc valve canyon and a .041 head gasket , not sure what gasket is .039 , gets you 8.85 , .039 gasket is 8.88, 5cc/.041 - 8.92, 5cc/.039 - 8.96, you need to cut the heads to 76cc to get your 9.5, the 162 just plain sucks for the intended application.
|
|
|
Re: 383 Quench Question
[Re: JohnRR]
#926026
02/13/11 07:49 PM
02/13/11 07:49 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275 Desert Tracker
HYPER8oSoNic
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.
My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.
What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?
I think you know more about it than I do, but I was thinking 9.5-1?
The specs you give above ASSuMEing a 4.280 bore , 6cc valve canyon and a .041 head gasket , not sure what gasket is .039 , gets you 8.85 , .039 gasket is 8.88, 5cc/.041 - 8.92, 5cc/.039 - 8.96, you need to cut the heads to 76cc to get your 9.5, the 162 just plain sucks for the intended application.
The 162's are out of the question as you stated, unless used with an UNDER 78cc closed chamber type head (516's or early 60' 413's - non M-W's). The kb 400 works well with an 80 - 86 cc aluminum head, OR the "516" iron head (with larger valves) depending on how "strong" of a 383 you want!! The 375-400 hp level is easy, it's when you break the 475-500 hp level things start to get lot tougher (for streetability).
Last edited by HYPER8oSoNic; 02/13/11 07:54 PM.
"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids" "Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
|
|
|
|
|