Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
[Re: Bob_Coomer]
#861057
11/23/10 12:14 AM
11/23/10 12:14 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,093 Long Beach, CA
Mike Swann
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,093
Long Beach, CA
|
If you going to rev it up, at a minumum the intake has to be ti. Its a big valve, 42gr less than SS.
8.30's @3400 lbs
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
[Re: Mike Swann]
#861058
11/23/10 12:24 AM
11/23/10 12:24 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 698 Alberta Canada
Edge
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 698
Alberta Canada
|
Not a great deal of difference between the MC and the original. In the end they are the same casting with some modification to accomodate the larger intake valve. Some petty good power can be made with the originals. If your goals are well above the potential of the originals I would look at PSO's or predators if you are starting from scratch. IMHO.
76 Duster
work in progress
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's *DELETED*
[Re: Bob_Coomer]
#861059
11/23/10 12:40 AM
11/23/10 12:40 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,873 MI, usa
dvw
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,873
MI, usa
|
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
[Re: dvw]
#861060
11/23/10 02:16 AM
11/23/10 02:16 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,382 Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,382
Las Vegas
|
The MC is capable of moving more air, so stands to reason will make more power.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
[Re: Bob_Coomer]
#861064
11/23/10 02:59 AM
11/23/10 02:59 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,397 Carson City, Nevada
Biginchmopar
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,397
Carson City, Nevada
|
Quote:
Quote:
MC heads move more air 470cfm and the Orignal B1 at best 420cfm. If it were me the motor being over 550cid MC head. The PSO and Predator will be about the same amount of money that being said Predator all the way.
MC move that much air? I knew they were good but figured 440-450 cfm tops.
I know of a couple of people that have a CNC progam that get those kind of numbers.
Muscle Motors Tom Hemphill
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
[Re: Biginchmopar]
#861065
11/23/10 03:14 AM
11/23/10 03:14 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,382 Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,382
Las Vegas
|
Depends on the goal. 1000HP MC motor is not gonna be a real difficult goal to achieve especially with those cubes. I am 100 over that with a lot less cubes and MC's.
BTW there are other folks who can get close to those numbers listed for MC's. I had a very good set on originals that were 415-420 depending on whos bench they were on. My MC's are 50ish CFM more, at least the two times they have been flowed. So IMO they CAN be worth 100hp depending on the combo.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
[Re: EchoSixMike]
#861066
11/23/10 05:04 PM
11/23/10 05:04 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840 Flint, Michigan
B1Fish540
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
|
Quote:
There's a guy in the swap meet trying to sell some TS's, if it's max effort, that or Predators would be the path. S/F....Ken M
yes, and imho, thats a smokin deal on those. The Pred flows about 540 and iirc, the TS is in the same territory. So, in other words, they out flow the next best B1(PSO)head by about 70 cfm..thats over 140 HP.
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
[Re: PETE@BESTMACHINE]
#861069
11/24/10 04:29 PM
11/24/10 04:29 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840 Flint, Michigan
B1Fish540
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
|
Quote:
It is posts like this that are full of wrong information. Have any of the people on this post even seen any of the B-1 Heads?. The B-1 head, orginal or M/C are the same casting, brodix moves the intake valve over for the 2.40 valve and that is it. The PSO head casting comes raw and has to have, guides, seats and a port put in it. The air flow is appox 35 cfm better on the M/C over the orginal And the PSO we did is appox 45 CFM better than the best M/C head we tested. In real world testing that we have done, we have seen about 40-50 Hp Better with the M/C head. It is hard to build one engine and just swap heads to see the gain. How much power and how fast are the cars of the people with all the answers on this post. This is how people that want to learn something on this site get wrong information and make the wrong choice in engine combos.
Thats why we need you, Pete! BTW, have you wroked with the TS head much? And if so hwo do you like them?
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
[Re: PETE@BESTMACHINE]
#861071
11/24/10 08:05 PM
11/24/10 08:05 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
It is posts like this that are full of wrong information. Have any of the people on this post even seen any of the B-1 Heads?. The B-1 head, orginal or M/C are the same casting, brodix moves the intake valve over for the 2.40 valve and that is it. The PSO head casting comes raw and has to have, guides, seats and a port put in it. The air flow is appox 35 cfm better on the M/C over the orginal And the PSO we did is appox 45 CFM better than the best M/C head we tested. In real world testing that we have done, we have seen about 40-50 Hp Better with the M/C head. It is hard to build one engine and just swap heads to see the gain. How much power and how fast are the cars of the people with all the answers on this post. This is how people that want to learn something on this site get wrong information and make the wrong choice in engine combos.
very well put Pete.
|
|
|
Re: B1 Orignals Vs B1 MC's
#861072
11/24/10 08:30 PM
11/24/10 08:30 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 653 Fredericksburg Va
plycuda
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 653
Fredericksburg Va
|
I don't know how much power the the 588 B-1 originals we built for my friends barracuda, but it weights 2700 and he's still tunning but it's been 8.11 at 164, with a single 4
Last edited by plycuda; 11/24/10 08:31 PM.
|
|
|
|
|