Re: Low buck 318 build...
[Re: dodge turbo]
#834576
10/23/10 09:54 AM
10/23/10 09:54 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068 Irving, TX
feets
Senior Management
|
Senior Management
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
|
Flipped?
Do you mean swapped?
I can see a right side fitting the left side but I can't see them bolting on upside down.
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind. - Stu Harmon
|
|
|
Re: Low buck 318 build...
[Re: dodge turbo]
#834579
10/25/10 09:56 AM
10/25/10 09:56 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533 Indiana
Fury Fan
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
|
Quote:
manifolds off a mag motor fit perfect in an a-body flipped side to side
Do they clear the PS gearbox or is manual steering required?
|
|
|
Re: Low buck 318 build...
[Re: Fury Fan]
#834580
10/26/10 08:37 AM
10/26/10 08:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 419 NY
F1Scamp
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 419
NY
|
The p/s manifold on the car will work great on d/s I just need to find a d/s that will work on the p/s. Anybody use a set-up like this? http://www.votionspeed.com/servlet/the-949/TYPE-5-Water-to/DetailIt seems it would work great for something that may get stuck in traffic or long periods of low speed? And the price is very comparable to a decent air-to-air setup when considering how much less piping you need to buy..
Work In Progress- 71' Duster F.A.S.T.- 10.36@130 Smallblock Record Holder.
|
|
|
Re: Low buck 318 build...
[Re: Duner]
#834585
10/27/10 10:56 AM
10/27/10 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533 Indiana
Fury Fan
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
|
Duner has far more experience than me (and a lot of us, I suspect), but I'll throw out a tidbit I got from the Corky Bell book last night - (paraphrased)If running lower boost levels (less than 7-8?) an intercooler is of reduced benefit and efficiency of the compressor is a better place too focus. Learn to read the maps for various compressors and find one with an efficiency greater than 70% for the usage you intend. Duner's right, detonation is a prime killer for a shortblock, a good tune can prevent problems, but high ACT temps make a safe tune more challenging. As with most things, low-buck requires more attention in the planning stages. GIGO.
|
|
|
Re: Low buck 318 build...
[Re: Duner]
#834587
10/27/10 06:31 PM
10/27/10 06:31 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847 Oakdale CT
gdonovan
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847
Oakdale CT
|
Quote:
Intercoolers are worth the effort.
Closest thing you will get to a free lunch, to give you an idea how good it is...
One a typical turbo mopar without an interccoler you can run 6-7 psi of boost on 87 octane swill and chances are you will start pinging.
With an intercooler? I have run 18 psi on the same gas. =)
|
|
|
Re: Low buck 318 build...
[Re: gdonovan]
#834588
10/28/10 02:32 PM
10/28/10 02:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 419 NY
F1Scamp
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 419
NY
|
I def. will run an intercooler, I was just thinking a water to air intercooler would be more efficent than air to air. The same company makes bigger intercooler's for not much more money. I have been doing somemore research on the turbo sizing.... I think this would be a pretty good choice. Might be alittle small, but I am not going for broke. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayIS...RK%3AMEWNX%3AIT
Work In Progress- 71' Duster F.A.S.T.- 10.36@130 Smallblock Record Holder.
|
|
|
|
|