Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 13 of 21 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 20 21
Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: anlauto] #782938
11/09/10 07:11 PM
11/09/10 07:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
E
ECS Offline
David Walden
ECS  Offline
David Walden
E

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
Quote:

....find some correct date code rubber pellets and make your own exact copies of the tires with the dates you need...Sounds simple to me





I talked with John Kelsey last week while attending SEMA and actually discussed having tires made without the DOT information molded into the sidewall. He said that up until six weeks ago he could have made the wording in the bead area. By doing this, the wording would have been invisible once the tire was mounted on the rim. Even if this could be done the Judges would still deduct for them being reproduction tires. There is something about the appearance/patina of original tires that can't be reproduced.

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: JulesdaWiperman] #782939
11/09/10 07:30 PM
11/09/10 07:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
E
ECS Offline
David Walden
ECS  Offline
David Walden
E

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
Quote:

Are you going to try and find out what EXACTLY was wrong with other aspects of the car?
Jules




I have already tried to get some specific answers! There was more effort avoiding the questions than it would have taken to simply answer them. Here is a BRIEF example of some of the email commentary that went back and forth between us:


From: Dave Walden
To: Keith & Joy Rohm
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: question

Howdy Keith,
Thank you for the update!! The Valiant "team" was curious how the deductions actually added up. I know at the show you had said that the power steering fluid was the largest deduction being a point and a half. I really didn't think those points would be adjusted or added back into the score even after the correct information was disclosed following the Event. The show was over and things were what they were! So what ended up being the lion's share of deductions that raised the total to -9.25? While the score was very high, we didn't think that the other infractions would have exceeded more than 5 points!?! I know that we were dinged a half point for the clear VIN overlay. Without knowing the deductions given for the tires, the power steering fluid and the overlay made a total of -2 points. What other area(s) of the car "ate up" the remaining -7.25 points? Just curious....as always!

Sincerely,
Dave


From: Keith & Joy Rohm <knjrohm@watchtv.net>
Subject: Re: question
To: "Dave Walden" <dave@ecsautomotive.com>
Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 6:00 AM

Most OE contestants know where , if you want to call them shortcomings, are located.The contestant just hopes we don't find them.The value of as you call them deductions are determined by the team. You cannot outguess everything.


From: Dave Walden
To: Keith & Joy Rohm
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: question

Hi Keith,
Why can't there be a simple answer to a simple question? I have never tried to hide anything with regards to having a vehicle judged in your program. I do my best to do things right and have ALWAYS told you guys the truth with regards to what we did. Concerning the tires, they are what they are! Try finding a mint set of Power Cushion 6.95X14 tires that just happen to have a perfect date that coincides with the exact build date of the car! You can't go to Kmart or Target to find a set!! I had to use what was available. By no means were we trying to "outguess" or fool anyone. We simply had to use what we were lucky enough to find. We didn't use them just to test you guys.....!

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: ECS] #782940
11/09/10 09:33 PM
11/09/10 09:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,170
DELAWARE
TONY_DAGOSTINO Offline
master
TONY_DAGOSTINO  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,170
DELAWARE
dave you are 1000% right

dont stop asking, you wouldn't if it was someone else

you need to find out the areas to "correct" to make your car "nationals oe correct" whatever that may be

i'd like to know too,

its great to have a judging forum + i know it cant be easy,the judges should be commended for that,
but it needs to be based on something real, not figure it out or make up new criteria as you go along

is there a judging point sheet available?

off topic but a connected story,
many years ago, like close to 20, i wanted to become a "certified" classic car appraiser.
1 company nationally accalimed apparaisal company told me i needed to send in my appraisal form him + the guys would review it and let me know. for obvious reasons i didnt follow through with them, but i did with a apprasial company that made me go through lengthy seminars and testing prior to me getting certified.

if the oe judging has become too big for the current judging platform then maybe they need to stepback, regroup, reorganize + get better.

not just have a group of guys talking back and forth to come to a conclusion of the day.

id much rather hear "whoa dave, we havent inspected a car like this before + due to the over the top resto we now realize that we need to revamp our judging to properly judge and reflect a level of restoration that you have brought to us" not "were dinging you in this area",

like you said, you just want simple answers to simple questions

peace to all
tony

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: TONY_DAGOSTINO] #782941
11/10/10 02:25 PM
11/10/10 02:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
E
ECS Offline
David Walden
ECS  Offline
David Walden
E

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
Quote:

dont stop asking, you wouldn't if it was someone else

you need to find out the areas to "correct" to make your car "nationals oe correct" whatever that may be





There is nothing left for me to ask them Mr. T! Those emails I posted are just a few of the correspondence that went back and forth trying to get specifics. I don't understand all the secrecy. I was told point blank that they would not address anything else regarding the judging score! (See for yourself in the email correspondence below.) Can anyone imagine taking a test in School and just receiving a grade?!?! No indication of what you missed or need to work on, just a grade saying that things were wrong but we won't tell specifically what was wrong! Like I said earlier, I KNOW what we did with this car and the things that were "wrong". Here were the last two emails to illustrate how this ordeal was concluded/finished. I never received a response after my final email listed below.


From: Keith & Joy Rohm <knjrohm@watchtv.net>
Subject: Re: question
To: "Dave Walden" <dave@ecsautomotive.com>
Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 6:06 PM

DAVE,This is going in circles again your valiant is the nicest piece that we have ever had the opportunity to look at.Did the door sticker come with clear vinyl over it.I will not address anything else.You will be receiving your summary along with the other four OE contestants.
Thank You for the spirited conversation.
KEITH



Re: question
Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:34 PM
From:"Dave Walden" <dave@ecsautomotive.com>
View contact details
To:"Keith & Joy Rohm" <knjrohm@watchtv.net>

Keith,
It is going in circles because you continue to do everything you can to avoid my simple and direct questions. It is not about having the "nicest" car that you have looked at. It is about cohesive consistency with the way things are done. To answer your question about the overlay.....NO....it was not the original one that was applied over the original decal. Based on your rationale (as it pertains to THAT subject matter) should I assume to see deductions for the reproduction paint used on the original body panels of the car, the reproduction plating on the original nuts and bolts, the reproduction chrome on the original front bumper, the reproduction blue paint used on the dash frame, the reproduction paint used on the original engine, the reproduction paint used on the original rear end housing, etc.... If you did not deduct for those areas (which fall into the EXACT classification as the overlay) what discriminating criteria did you use to ignore or distinguish between those same differences? I am not trying to be pushy! I genuinely ask these things because things don't make sense and I thought you might be kind enough to explain the answers. I apologize if I irritated you. Thanks again for everything Keith.


Dave

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: ECS] #782942
11/10/10 03:02 PM
11/10/10 03:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,338
the house on the left.
C
cogen80 Offline
master
cogen80  Offline
master
C

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,338
the house on the left.
what i take out of him not answering your questions is that he has no idea and there is not "standard" i'd guess you would call it while they are judging. they just wing it and make sure you don't get a perfect score. sounds like a bunch of BS to me. if they deducted points then they better know what they deducted for. how else are ya supposed to get better? what a freaking joke the whole thing is. yea we took points off but can't tell ya why.

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: cogen80] #782943
11/10/10 04:09 PM
11/10/10 04:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,170
DELAWARE
TONY_DAGOSTINO Offline
master
TONY_DAGOSTINO  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,170
DELAWARE
hi
there is a standard,
ive figured it out

below are all of the descriptions of the judging point system:

nick
deduction
highest quality
no deductions
small deduction
couple of small partial deductions
date coding
almost flawless except for one deduction
no deduction despite discussion
partial point deduction
like brand new

no why would anyone have a hard time figuring out that point structure

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: TONY_DAGOSTINO] #782944
11/10/10 04:52 PM
11/10/10 04:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:

hi
there is a standard,
ive figured it out

below are all of the descriptions of the judging point system:

nick
deduction
highest quality
no deductions
small deduction
couple of small partial deductions
date coding
almost flawless except for one deduction
no deduction despite discussion
partial point deduction
like brand new

no why would anyone have a hard time figuring out that point structure







Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: DPelletier] #782945
11/10/10 09:37 PM
11/10/10 09:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,304
Land of 10,000 Lakes
4
44D6PAKCUDA Offline
top fuel
44D6PAKCUDA  Offline
top fuel
4

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,304
Land of 10,000 Lakes
Dave,with all thats been "exposed" in this post about the OE judging system,do you think,if you do another OE car,that you will be judged fairly or maybe looked at as being the "bad guy".

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: 44D6PAKCUDA] #782946
11/10/10 09:51 PM
11/10/10 09:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
E
ECS Offline
David Walden
ECS  Offline
David Walden
E

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
Quote:

Dave,with all thats been "exposed" in this post about the OE judging system,do you think,if you do another OE car,that you will be judged fairly or maybe looked at as being the "bad guy".




I simply told the truth and conveyed the facts for what they were. If the Judges are upset with any of this ordeal, they should look no further than the reflection in the mirror to vent their frustration! As stated earlier, I don't plan on doing another OE Mopar. If they would be vindictive to the point that you mentioned, it would certainly "expose" another Sad (and pitiful) aspect to what they offer this hobby.....wouldn't you agree?!?

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: ECS] #782947
11/10/10 10:30 PM
11/10/10 10:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,304
Land of 10,000 Lakes
4
44D6PAKCUDA Offline
top fuel
44D6PAKCUDA  Offline
top fuel
4

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,304
Land of 10,000 Lakes
I agree 100% Dave.I wonder what the future holds for Mopar Nats OE judging.......

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: 44D6PAKCUDA] #782948
11/10/10 11:27 PM
11/10/10 11:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
So let me get this correct.....these "judges" say there are things wrong with the car but they won't tell you what the problems are?? Is that correct??

I'm sorry but that is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.

As far as I'm concerned, what little credibility those "judges" have just went out the window.


....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: 44D6PAKCUDA] #782949
11/10/10 11:33 PM
11/10/10 11:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 601
Wausau Wi
C
Convertcuda Offline
mopar
Convertcuda  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 601
Wausau Wi
I think its time for change. Why would someone want to spend tons of money and time and get unsatisfied results. I have watched the judging process for the last 3 years at mopar nats and had one of my customers car judged there. The judges that judged new less about the car than the owner. For example, the judge told me he did know the difference beteen a repro dash pad and a original one. We lost a point because we had a bigger gap on one side of the grill than the other. I have seen over a 100 cars with the same factory defect. It seemed to me that class we were in that repro parts scored higher points than NOS factory original. I wish they would tell guy that up front. They take points off for halogen headlights but not a repro dash. My excitement of taking another car to nats to get judged has been lowered since I have seen the judging process.

Last edited by convertcuda; 11/10/10 11:34 PM.
Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: Convertcuda] #782950
11/11/10 12:00 AM
11/11/10 12:00 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
E
ECS Offline
David Walden
ECS  Offline
David Walden
E

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
The "deduction" that baffles me the most is the one for the ACCESSORIES & BATTERY where we were given "almost flawless except for one deduction". Since there are one thousand accessories to the car, what was the deduction allocated to? I mentioned in an earlier post that my OE Challenger had a reproduction battery and received no deductions in 2008. This car had a BEAUTIFUL-FACTORY-CORRECTLY DATED-ASSEMBLY LINE BATTERY with NOS FACTORY-ASSEMBLY LINE-PRISTINE CABLES and we received a "deduction". I have personally NEVER seen another entry go through OE Judging with an assembly line battery in perfect working condition! The battery hold-down was original to the car and the rubber was LIKE NEW as well as the hold-down rods and attaching hardware!! Here are a couple pictures that show the battery and the cables.





Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: ECS] #782951
11/11/10 12:14 AM
11/11/10 12:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,365
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,365
Someplace you aren't
You got jobbed Dave, really you did.

I know that you enjoy, or did enjoy, this part of the hobby.

I could NEVER get into it. This crap is exactly why.

If all cars were made to "roll on repops", there would be no tire controversy. It is just stuff like that that makes me glad I stay away.

Other than the free entertainment. That I will take in.

Good luck and if you make it down here, look us up for a good time.

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: SomeCarGuy] #782952
11/11/10 12:40 AM
11/11/10 12:40 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
E
ECS Offline
David Walden
ECS  Offline
David Walden
E

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
Thank you VERY much for the post! I will always enjoy this stuff. I just can't figure out how I became the "bad guy" in all of this. All I did was ask some questions to convey to the rest of the Valiant team. (Tom Barcroft, Steve Been and Dave Stuart) I would have thought that with three Gold OE entries in the past five years, the Sponsorship Support and involvement with manufacturing some "okay" products for the industry, we might be considered an advocate to the program. Instead, I am shocked that this car has drawn so much animosity (and ill will) with a few people following the conclusion of the event. From anonymous people contacting the Magazines (trying to ruin our feature) to the stand off attitude of the Judges, this project has me dumbfounded with regards to the "after" Show responses.

Weird....Weird....Weird!

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: ECS] #782953
11/11/10 09:16 AM
11/11/10 09:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,984
Montreal,Quebec,Canada
J
JulesdaWiperman Offline
super gas
JulesdaWiperman  Offline
super gas
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,984
Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Dave,
This is the classic case of the student who knows more than the teacher syndrome.
The teacher does not know how to get out of the corner so let's just be vague about the results
and hope it all blows away.Where are the judges on this thread ? Why don't they chime in and discuss this?
Why don't other judges for that matter contribute their opinon in this matter?
Jules

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: JulesdaWiperman] #782954
11/11/10 01:34 PM
11/11/10 01:34 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
E
ECS Offline
David Walden
ECS  Offline
David Walden
E

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
Quote:

Dave, This is the classic case of the student who knows more than the teacher syndrome.





Brother Jules,
One thing I know from the Chrysler guys (only a small select few mind you) is that I don't know much of anything that I have been intimately involved with for the past 14 years. Whether it be Restorations, VIN data information or documented vehicle research, I will probably never be able to express a view without having to post MANY pictures to substantiate that particular view. Even when I do THAT, it still isn't good enough for the "experts" who have nothing more than their opinions to "type" and offer to everyone. I guess that's Okay! I don't think anyone should simply take another person's word for any of this stuff without taking the time to research it for themselves.

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: ECS] #782955
11/11/10 04:50 PM
11/11/10 04:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,130
Chicago Blackhawks
H
hemicar1971 Offline
master
hemicar1971  Offline
master
H

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,130
Chicago Blackhawks
Dave I look at this alittle differently. This is a game and the rules are not set in stone. They can change with new judges and new information,personal opinions, on and on. Until there is are proper standards to follow when judging any mopar the judges are free to judge anyway they would feel correct. Now you have posted every detail of your restorations. That is good for the public, but it is not always good for the Judging of your cars. These Judges have seen your posts on moparts and know most things that you have done to your car before they ever see it. They know the places to look for repro products and non correct date codes. I bet your car was on the judging plateform longer than all the other cars that were Judged. The Judges at the Nationals, I have watched them and have wondered how these huge men can get into a car and even look for things in hard to get to places that have dates codes. I do not know if they were the same Judges in 2010 but I had to laugh when watching them in 2008.

The Standard to reach is Gold at the Nationals and your cars have reached this.

This is why I drag race my mopar. The rules are set in stone.It is up to me to produce on the track. If I screw up being late on the light or run under my Window time it is all my fault, not any Judges fault.


1971 HEMI E BODY REGISTRY
Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: ECS] #782956
11/11/10 04:55 PM
11/11/10 04:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,741
KY
65pacecar Offline OP
master
65pacecar  Offline OP
master

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,741
KY
Dave,

Again, Congratulations on a perfect restoration that apparently pushed the judges at the Nats beyond their knowledge. The only explanation for such a vague results sheet and lack of detail on the deductions is the fact they had to be grasping at straws just to create a few deductions. From what I understand the original idea behind the detail sheet was to let the car owner/restorer understand the deductions to give them a chance to correct the issues; giving the owner a chance to be judged again after a waiting period of 2-3 years. I have been involved with OE Restored cars in the past and I must say the Ford and Vette Programs do a much better job of documentation and communication with the owner concerning their cars strong and Weak points. The MoPar Nats are billed as the premier Mopar show in the world, the judging format and results information should live up to the same billing.

Re: OE Gold Valiant Pictures From The Mopar Nationals. [Re: hemicar1971] #782957
11/11/10 08:24 PM
11/11/10 08:24 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
E
ECS Offline
David Walden
ECS  Offline
David Walden
E

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,711
USA
Quote:

*This is a game and the rules are not set in stone........
*These Judges have seen your posts on moparts and know most things that you have done to your car before they ever see it........
*This is why I drag race my mopar. The rules are set in stone........





* It should never be a "game". The Judging criteria is simple and straight forward. If there is an error as it pertains to an Original Equipment deduction, document it and continue Judging.

* It never bothered or concerned me that this vehicle's components were on display long before the show. I welcomed the extra scrutiny to find any deficiencies with our efforts. When you do the proper research and document things in an accurate manner, you have no reason to be worried or feel the need to constantly look over your shoulder!

* I am not involved with racing but allow me to offer this analogy. Suppose you ran 3 races and on the third race you asked about your time because the time display was turned off. When you asked, the track supervisors told you that your time was better than the first two runs but with a few hiccups along the way. When you asked what the time was specifically, you were told that is was a good time and one of the better times that was run at the event. You asked AGAIN what your specific time was and what "hiccups" they were referring to?!? The event supervisors start to get upset and instruct you to be happy and content with the information that they have provided! It should be enough that they were willing to convey this information that they had provided about YOUR race. They then state that the subject matter is getting "redundant" and you are starting to "talk in circles" with your inquiries. They conclude by saying your time was better than the first two attempts and they were not going to discuss it with you any further! Case closed!

Now at this juncture in the story, how would you feel if someone from the OE tent walked over to the race track and said, "Hemicar1971, I look at this a little differently. This is a game and the rules are not set in stone....."

Page 13 of 21 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 20 21






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1