Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal #770769
08/10/10 05:59 PM
08/10/10 05:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,926
S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY Offline OP
I Live Here
ZIPPY  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,926
S.E. Michigan
Well this is interesting...the MP crew somehow managed to convince NHRA to make the 6.4L/392 Gen 3 HEMI engine legal for Stock Eliminator.

This is (roughly) the 6.1-based, 4.055 bore/3.795 stroke/6.2 rod/10.5:1 basic combination that Mopar Performance has sold as a crate engine since 2007.

Unlike the "normal" MP FI crate engine (which uses a stock intake), the NHRA legal version uses a drag pak single plane intake and 1000cfm throttle body....just like on the drag pak 6.1.

Major differences between the 6.4 and the drag pak 6.1 are minimal...It has a much lower compression ratio than the 6.1, the crank and pistons are different to achieve the displacement, and as far as I know that's about it.

It's starting out with an NHRA rating of 375 HP which seems fair, given the lower compression.

Spread the word to your class racin' friends. It seems to be a nice move towards embedding the Gen 3 Hemi that much deeper into the sport, and driving more development all the way around.


Rich H.

Esse Quam Videri




Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: ZIPPY] #770770
08/10/10 07:25 PM
08/10/10 07:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,898
Florida
Locomotion Offline
master
Locomotion  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,898
Florida
But what bodies and model years would it be legal in? Original Drag Pack Challengers as an option to replace the 5.9 Magnum and 5.7 Hemi that were not carried over into the 2010 models?

Last edited by Locomotion; 08/10/10 07:28 PM.
Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: ZIPPY] #770771
08/10/10 07:52 PM
08/10/10 07:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
B1Fish540 Offline
master
B1Fish540  Offline
master

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
Cool, but I always thought the 6.4 was a "hotter" engine than the 6.1, guess not, just more displacement.

Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: B1Fish540] #770772
08/10/10 09:40 PM
08/10/10 09:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
M
mr_340 Offline
master
mr_340  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
It looks like the shipping weight got bumped up from 3100 pounds to 3200 pounds on the 2010 models. Were they having trouble making the shipping weight?


Floyd Lippencott IV
Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: mr_340] #770773
08/10/10 09:44 PM
08/10/10 09:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,502
SOUTH JERSEY
HEMIFRED Offline
master
HEMIFRED  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,502
SOUTH JERSEY
Quote:

It looks like the shipping weight got bumped up from 3100 pounds to 3200 pounds on the 2010 models. Were they having trouble making the shipping weight?




I think I heard since many of them came out capable of qualifying #1 on the first time some hit the track that was an NHRA move.


home of the
Sox and Martin Hemi Duster


Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: HEMIFRED] #770774
08/10/10 10:50 PM
08/10/10 10:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,926
S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY Offline OP
I Live Here
ZIPPY  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,926
S.E. Michigan
The MP drag pak 6.1 (but not the OE engine) is 12:1, the 392 drag pak is 10.5:1 (I don't know what the OE engine will be yet, but I've noticed the OE 6.4 is just starting to show up as an engine option in Star Parts, so it probably won't be long)......that's where the rating came from.

That's some really redundant, horrible sentence structure there....just trying to differentiate the Mopar Performance Drag Pak engine combo from the OE production one.

As to which one is hotter...it should be interesting to see which one really performs better over time: 370ci/12:1, or 392/10.5:1.......for now the low compression motor is starting out with less but time will tell.

I'm not 100% sure what chassis it is supposed to be legal for....As soon as I understand the whole picture better I'll post about it.


Rich H.

Esse Quam Videri




Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: ZIPPY] #770775
08/11/10 02:05 AM
08/11/10 02:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
M
mr_340 Offline
master
mr_340  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
The 6.4L is listed in the 2010 Dodge Classification Guide, but not in the 2009 Dodge. See attachment.

6133948-2010DOD[1].xls (173 downloads)

Floyd Lippencott IV
Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: ZIPPY] #770776
08/11/10 03:00 PM
08/11/10 03:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 226
S
sst404b Offline
enthusiast
sst404b  Offline
enthusiast
S

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 226
Where can I buy a 6.4 long block at the best price?
Ray Buckner
Drag Pack#98

6134638-july_003.jpg (233 downloads)
Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: sst404b] #770777
08/11/10 03:38 PM
08/11/10 03:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,926
S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY Offline OP
I Live Here
ZIPPY  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,926
S.E. Michigan
For the best price, at some point there is supposed to be to be a 6.4 kit to put into a 6.1 block. That way a guy can use what he already has.

For now the lowest priced way to do it with new parts, and not using an existing engine.... is to buy a whole stock 6.1 for 6250, sell everythig not needed for maybe 1000 or so, then build it back up with the nhra accepted 6.4 pieces.


Rich H.

Esse Quam Videri




Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: HEMIFRED] #770778
08/11/10 07:31 PM
08/11/10 07:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,232
Park Forest, IL
slantzilla Offline
Too Many Posts
slantzilla  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,232
Park Forest, IL
Quote:

Quote:

It looks like the shipping weight got bumped up from 3100 pounds to 3200 pounds on the 2010 models. Were they having trouble making the shipping weight?




I think I heard since many of them came out capable of qualifying #1 on the first time some hit the track that was an NHRA move.




The 5.7 and 6.1 have both gotten horsepower already. That happens when they are factored soft to begin with and racers don't guard the combo.


"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: slantzilla] #770779
08/11/10 08:12 PM
08/11/10 08:12 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,245
Between a rock & a hard place
C
cudadoug Offline
master
cudadoug  Offline
master
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,245
Between a rock & a hard place
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

It looks like the shipping weight got bumped up from 3100 pounds to 3200 pounds on the 2010 models. Were they having trouble making the shipping weight?




I think I heard since many of them came out capable of qualifying #1 on the first time some hit the track that was an NHRA move.




The 5.7 and 6.1 have both gotten horsepower already. That happens when they are factored soft to begin with and racers don't guard the combo.




I'm as Mopar as the next guy, but these "package cars" in STOCK are sooooo BOGUS!
Wonder how much it cost Mopar to buy this decision from NHRA?? Guess since GM wasn't around to fight it...maybe it was an easy sell.

These cars need to be factored into SUPER Stock where they belong. Otherwise in Stock, it should be with a "regular" Chally. Just like everyone else has had to deal with since time began.

At least limit the accepted motor what is available on the dealers floor and put the 6.4 and 5.9 Mag in a SS/GT class...with the RIGHT factor.

Last edited by cudadoug; 08/11/10 08:13 PM.
Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: cudadoug] #770780
08/11/10 08:48 PM
08/11/10 08:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
M
mr_340 Offline
master
mr_340  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
As far as I can tell from reading the NHRA Classification Guides, none of the production Challengers are legal for the years 2008-2010. Only the Drag Pack Challengers are listed with the various engine combos. Not even the Charger is listed. It appears that no one at Chrysler has submitted any information to NHRA for approval of the production cars. Or NHRA hasn't approved them?


Floyd Lippencott IV
Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: cudadoug] #770781
08/12/10 11:17 AM
08/12/10 11:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 269
Kansas wishing I was in Ohio
S
SeanD Offline
enthusiast
SeanD  Offline
enthusiast
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 269
Kansas wishing I was in Ohio
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

It looks like the shipping weight got bumped up from 3100 pounds to 3200 pounds on the 2010 models. Were they having trouble making the shipping weight?




I think I heard since many of them came out capable of qualifying #1 on the first time some hit the track that was an NHRA move.




The 5.7 and 6.1 have both gotten horsepower already. That happens when they are factored soft to begin with and racers don't guard the combo.




I'm as Mopar as the next guy, but these "package cars" in STOCK are sooooo BOGUS!
Wonder how much it cost Mopar to buy this decision from NHRA?? Guess since GM wasn't around to fight it...maybe it was an easy sell.

These cars need to be factored into SUPER Stock where they belong. Otherwise in Stock, it should be with a "regular" Chally. Just like everyone else has had to deal with since time began.

At least limit the accepted motor what is available on the dealers floor and put the 6.4 and 5.9 Mag in a SS/GT class...with the RIGHT factor.




Personally, I am not concerned AT ALL about these "package cars". Brand "X" gets enough rules allowance that it is about time Ma got a make-up call from the officials.

Re: MP 392/6.4L Gen 3 Hemi Engine: NHRA Stock legal [Re: SeanD] #770782
08/12/10 12:05 PM
08/12/10 12:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,719
Home
S
SRT6776 Offline
I hate internal combustion engines!
SRT6776  Offline
I hate internal combustion engines!
S

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,719
Home
The biggest factor in allowing the 6.4L is probably because it'll be sitting between the fenders of the 2011 Challenger SRT8 when it comes out in November.

Here is one in a 2012 Grand Cherokee SRT8 mule

Power is said to be anywhere from 480 - 505+

6136268-6.4L.jpg (265 downloads)






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1