Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: Fury Fan]
#662755
12/14/10 02:04 PM
12/14/10 02:04 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,951 Oregon
hooziewhatsit
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,951
Oregon
|
Quote:
I hadn't considered the rotation of the wheel, but I'll be doing a bigblock and it's the same rotation as the 5.0. Lucky for me.
Overall, I think the EEC-IV's reaction to what we're doing will follow this process -- -- all in milliseconds, too. Followed by some Dear-diary typing into some long-term adaptive tables.
I agree that shaving 1 tooth on the Mopar wheel will be an easy route, I mentioned earlier that it the TFI triggers on a falling edge, so make sure to pivot on that feature when orienting your wheel.
Big block? Cheater It will match up as long as you orient the teeth down. I'm tentatively hoping to orient the teeth up, so I can use the dodge hall sensor, which doesn't require pulling the wheel off to replace the hall sensor.
From the autocad drawing you sent me, it looks like the teeth on the dodge wheel are on average 2-4* narrower than the Ford wheel. Like I mentioned above, if going backwards is close enough to work, I'd bet being 4* narrower than stock won't hurt anything. The other option I came up with was some way to make the necessary teeth that much wider
I heard back from the online machinist about making a wheel of the right diameter, so I can add the teeth in myself. Including the material, is $85 for one, $160 for three, or $215 for five. It would be similar to the pictures of Andrewh's trigger wheel.
Now I need to find a dodge 8 tooth wheel or two to experiment with
If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
|
|
|
Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: hooziewhatsit]
#662759
12/16/10 09:54 AM
12/16/10 09:54 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,767
Andrewh
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,767
|
so a couple of things. First yes someone is running it with a sb too, so rotation doesn't seem to matter.
Two, I think you are over thinking the wheel size and tooth size.
First, there is no way for them to know which one is the short tooth till after it passes. So my bet is it just does a cal check. By the way I just past number 1, where do you think I am.
Now the only concern I have is how they figure out which one is the short tooth.
Timing should not be an issue. Since they use the tooth as the trigger. My bet is that the smaller diameter of the mopar wheel will make up for the size of the teeth since the ford wheel is probably proportionally the same. But I don't want to do the math to figure it out this morning. But basically what I am saying is, why have that complex table programmed in if you don't need it. What purpose would it server to calculate timing based on the size of the teeth.
back to how they figure out the short tooth. my concern there is as you speculated, why not have a table based on rpm for how long it takes that tooth to pass to say yep, here is number 1.
But I say that isn't fluid enough. Wouldn't it be smarter to say, take the average of the last 7 teeth and compare to the next one. if it is shorter call it number 1. I understand rapid acceleration might change it, but would be easy with tps to say, you are at wot, so don't take that measurement, or take x percent difference due to accelleration.
I bet it will take the smaller wheel into account.
|
|
|
Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: Andrewh]
#662761
10/27/11 12:14 AM
10/27/11 12:14 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,951 Oregon
hooziewhatsit
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,951
Oregon
|
Nope, haven't done anything else on it. Still hoping to come across a cheap ECU on flea-bay But I was thinking (oops), I don't want my truck to be down for the duration of figuring out the EFI, so it would be nice to have a test stand for the engine. And if I do the transmission controller, it would be nice to have a transmission test stand. I have a buddy with a spare 318 I could probably use, and I have a 46RE that in theory should work alright. Once I get all my 'before snow' projects done here, I'll look into starting these projects.
If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
|
|
|
Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: ralphie361]
#662763
11/01/11 12:03 PM
11/01/11 12:03 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533 Indiana
Fury Fan
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
|
Hoozie - Depending on how you plan to do the wiring you can bench test some of it, I think. My plan was to put a terminal block junction on the stub out of the EEC, install some relays for ign, fuel pump, etc, similar to what the EEC used. Then make a new engine harness to attach to teh terminal block. By tickling the EEC with ign the FP should give the 2-sec prime pulse. If the dizzy is spun via an electric drill or drill press (which would give various steady speeds) the EEC should figure out the 'engine' is starting/running and start to fire injectors. If using a drill press you'd need some way to keep teh dizzy housing from rotating. All of the above would require having a bunch of indicator lights wired in, or you'd need to go round-robin with a test lite (if it works). If the injectors don't start lighting up, then it's kinda normal EEC diagnosis. You might need an LED to watch the injectors flash, I've never tried a standard test light to see how it works. My harness/terminal setup is probably 3/4 complete but bigger fish keep getting in front of it. I've contemplated buying the EZ-EFI multiport retrofit kit, but I know I won't have time to install that either.
|
|
|
Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: Fury Fan]
#662764
11/01/11 08:41 PM
11/01/11 08:41 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,951 Oregon
hooziewhatsit
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,951
Oregon
|
I guess that should work as well. My main concern right now is making the distributor run reverse from what Ford does. Even if it activates the injectors, about the only way to know if it'll run is to throw it on an engine. And I don't want to break in a new 408 with a bad system. I did find a 5.0 ECU (A9S) on ebay today. Should have it sometime soon. Got several of my 'before snow' projects done recently, so getting closer to being able to work on this some more
If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
|
|
|
Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: hooziewhatsit]
#662767
12/15/11 12:49 PM
12/15/11 12:49 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533 Indiana
Fury Fan
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
|
Thanks for the contribution, EDL94!!! That $700 dizzy would solve 1 problem, that's for sure, but for me it kills the budget and the main justification for the 5.0 EFI. This dizzy is a lot cheaper and might work just fine, too. http://www.summitracing.com/search/Part-...d=mallory+moparI simply need to verify if hte dizzy I made works electrically, and then review how to mount/orient the wheel.
|
|
|
Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: Fury Fan]
#662768
12/15/11 02:37 PM
12/15/11 02:37 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,767
Andrewh
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,767
|
I may have missed it, 3 pages worth, but did you try to get an output from the ford distributer and compare it to the dodge one?
also since these are batch fired, does it matter which on is #1 to the computer?
and finally, if either of you have everything but the distributer, I have a sb unilite sitting around, perhaps you can try to run it straight and see what it does? cut a tooth for where it indexes in the ford if you need to.
and then finally, if neither of you has time, send the stuff to me and I will try both, my distributer with the odd wheel in it and the unilite.
I think all I need is the computer and harness. I can reuse my injectors. if they plug in.
|
|
|
Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: edl94]
#662773
04/22/12 11:16 PM
04/22/12 11:16 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,235 Marion Illinois
72d100
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,235
Marion Illinois
|
Quote:
It runs! I woke up the wife at 7:30 this morning to the roar of the cam break in. Still needs tuning but it responds to throttle ok and idles well. Still alot of work to do but the ford system will work on a big block mopar.
thats a cool looking setup cant wait to hear more about it
|
|
|
Re: 5.9 efi a different way
[Re: hooziewhatsit]
#662774
04/22/12 11:38 PM
04/22/12 11:38 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 8 Washington
edl94
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 8
Washington
|
Details: It is a 440 with 9.8 to 1 compression, stealth heads, Holley street dominator intake modified (for EFI), Lunati 60303 cam, windage tray, Schumacher try-y headers, and TTI 2.5 x-pipe exhaust. Oh you ment the EFI details. This would not be considered a buget build. I did use a couple of used parts from ebay,(The MAF and 30# injectors) the rest was new. The fuel rails,and intake throttle body adaptor are edelbrock. The intake is a modified holley street dominator. I used a holley throttle body, painless wire harness,and all new ford style sensors. The trick is still the dizzy. I spent the cash and bought a mallory 95 series dizzy. It has a hall effect sensor and #1 cyl ID built in, the problem is #1 mopar and #1 ford are not the same. Just put the #1 ford or #2 mopar plug wire at the #1 id spot and wire the rest around the circle. the rotor still needs to point at mopar #1 at tdc. Hard to type but not that hard in real life. I also am using a quarterhorse programing card. It allows me full access to tuning and datalogging the ford ecu. I am using an A9L ecu all I have done so far is change the injector firing order, the cid, and the injector size. It seems to run OK but will need some work run great. I remote mounted the TFI on a heat sinc from ebay. I know I have not covered it all but if any one has more questions ask and I wil do my best to answer.
|
|
|
|
|