Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: HotRodDave] #509810
10/28/09 09:07 PM
10/28/09 09:07 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline OP
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline OP
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
Quote:

I don't know how much another 5 percent would have made of a differance but they suposedly run 15 percent gasoline minimum to give it some lube and keep from hurting rings...

Also remember that lead clogs up AF meters in the exhaust and other types just arn't as acurate.

The 105 octane rateing on the e-85 is kinda a As for if it was detonation I would think it could have happened during the gasoline run and not showed a problem till you switched to the E-85.misleading way of judging it's usefullness since it cools so much when it goes in the engine it kinda artificially increases it's octane even more.





I also run a top end lube, and have been running 90% for 2 years in my 15.2 to 1 motor. I thought it was better to add my own (was told this by an E85 expert)fuel to up the octane
level.

Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: camastomcat] #509811
10/29/09 09:20 PM
10/29/09 09:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Quote:

I mix Sonoco 112 with Sonoco Maximal 116 50/50 and add that 10% to 90% pure Ethonol. A/F on E85 was 9.6-1, and gas was 14.50-1.

the dyno owner operator said the A/F on his machine, should be 14.5 to one.



It is tough to say, but the engine builder that tore it apart thinks it was detonation, but maybe it was lean and burned them up (incorrect material for build). That does seem like a lot of CR for even a performance brewed E85, but judging by what they told you about A/F ratio, I can't even guess what the real A/F was and too lean could have detonated it. Especially on an engine dyno, some combos will make good power on the lean side, but that is pushing detonation, "lean is mean"

Is the dyno "14.5" based on an oxygen sensor or air and fuel flow measurements? He obviously doesn't care what the real A/F is and from his experience (on gas?) 14.5 was working for him. So when you ran E85 at "9.6" what does he think the actual A/F ratio was?
What I am getting at is that when people talk A/F on fuels other than gasoline (stoich 14.7), some people using oxygen sensors quote A/F on the gasoline scale rather than the actual scale of the fuel used.

E85 stoich is about 9.76 and E90 would be slightly lower
100% Ethanol 9.0
Methanol 6.4

I use an oxygen sensor, which by design indicates the ratio of A/F to stoich (called Lambda), so a stoich mixture is Lambda=1.0 and a typical power setting Lambda=0.85 (which is 0.85x14.7=12.5 actual A/F on gas). My engine is 13.5 CR and I have tried my E85 tune from 0.78 to 0.90 which is an actual A/F ratio of 7.6 to 8.7 (but on the gas scale it would read 11.5 to 13.2). So if your dyno run on E85 was an actual A/F of 9.6 that is way lean, basically stoich (ie from air and fuel flow measurements).

You obviously have had success with E85 for a couple years in your other motor with slightly less CR. Was it the E85 carb from that combo (ie known "good" E85 carb)?


1993 Daytona, 5.50 at 130mph (1/8) 1.19 sixty ft (PG). Link to 572 B1 - Part 1
Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: Bob_Coomer] #509812
10/29/09 09:38 PM
10/29/09 09:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Quote:

With that engine, I would forget the E-85 and run Alky? They are both cheap, and Fuel consumption would be similar.


I didn't find the fuel consumption to be similar between Alky and E85. I ran both in my injection system. I optimized the tune up for each fuel. I used 1.5 gallons per run with Alky and only 1.0 with E85. And I also used a lot more Alky to warm up the motor before the first run of the day. E85 put heat in the motor quicker/less fuel. Ofcourse the Alky cooled the motor more going down track. And FWIW, with my gas carb, this combo used 0.7 gallons per run. Pretty darn close to what you would expect from the stoich difference in the fuels.


1993 Daytona, 5.50 at 130mph (1/8) 1.19 sixty ft (PG). Link to 572 B1 - Part 1
Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: 440Jim] #509813
10/30/09 07:56 AM
10/30/09 07:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline OP
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline OP
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
Quote:

Quote:

I mix Sonoco 112 with Sonoco Maximal 116 50/50 and add that 10% to 90% pure Ethonol. A/F on E85 was 9.6-1, and gas was 14.50-1.

the dyno owner operator said the A/F on his machine, should be 14.5 to one.



It is tough to say, but the engine builder that tore it apart thinks it was detonation, but maybe it was lean and burned them up (incorrect material for build). That does seem like a lot of CR for even a performance brewed E85, but judging by what they told you about A/F ratio, I can't even guess what the real A/F was and too lean could have detonated it. Especially on an engine dyno, some combos will make good power on the lean side, but that is pushing detonation, "lean is mean"

Is the dyno "14.5" based on an oxygen sensor or air and fuel flow measurements? He obviously doesn't care what the real A/F is and from his experience (on gas?) 14.5 was working for him. So when you ran E85 at "9.6" what does he think the actual A/F ratio was?
What I am getting at is that when people talk A/F on fuels other than gasoline (stoich 14.7), some people using oxygen sensors quote A/F on the gasoline scale rather than the actual scale of the fuel used.

E85 stoich is about 9.7 and E90 would be slightly higher
100% Ethanol 9.0
Methanol 6.4

I use an oxygen sensor, which by design indicates the ratio of A/F to stoich (called Lambda), so a stoich mixture is Lambda=1.0 and a typical power setting Lambda=0.85 (which is 0.85x14.7=12.5 actual A/F on gas). My engine is 13.5 CR and I have tried my E85 tune from 0.78 to 0.90 which is an actual A/F ratio of 7.6 to 8.7 (but on the gas scale it would read 11.5 to 13.2). So if your dyno run on E85 was an actual A/F of 9.6 that is way lean, basically stoich (ie from air and fuel flow measurements).

You obviously have had success with E85 for a couple years in your other motor with slightly less CR. Was it the E85 carb from that combo (ie known "good" E85 carb)?




Great comments, Jim. You make some very dood points. I called John Kyle @ APD (he built the carb) and we talked for a half hour about exactly what you just asked. The dyno guy's A/F sensor was the type that is a hood over the carb. John said with that type of system, the numbers seem right. He also said that one run didn't kill the rings, and I agree. We might have had too much ignition lead, 36 degrees at one point, and that is what caused the detonation on gas. I have asked the engine builder to re-cc the motor. That should tell the story, yes this was a carb I used all year on my other motor. What puzzels me is, there was not sign of detonation on the bearings. But with an aluminum block I wonder if it would take longer to see because of the softer material with more flexability?

Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: camastomcat] #509814
10/30/09 08:22 AM
10/30/09 08:22 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
I did have one correction, with E90 the stoich A/F would be slightly lower than E85. A rough check:
Stoich Ethanol 9.0
Stoich Gasoline 14.7

E85: 0.85(9.0) + 0.15(14.7) = 7.65 + 2.21 = 9.8
E90: 0.90(9.0) + 0.10(14.7) = 8.10 + 1.47 = 9.6

Published numbers for E85 I have seen were 9.76. And I don't know if the stoich for the Maximal is different than 14.7 (maybe 14.5).

So, for max (safe) power, I would want to see richer than stoich, in the range I mentioned. And perhaps the dyno operator just has seen max power close to stoich on gas (but I would want to be richer to be safe). Use the cooling effect of the ethanol and put more fuel to it. But that may only be a secondary issue with the rings, not the prime cause.

Good luck.


1993 Daytona, 5.50 at 130mph (1/8) 1.19 sixty ft (PG). Link to 572 B1 - Part 1
Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: 440Jim] #509815
10/30/09 11:44 AM
10/30/09 11:44 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline OP
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline OP
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
Quote:

I did have one correction, with E90 the stoich A/F would be slightly lower than E85. A rough check:
Stoich Ethanol 9.0
Stoich Gasoline 14.7

E85: 0.85(9.0) + 0.15(14.7) = 7.65 + 2.21 = 9.8
E90: 0.90(9.0) + 0.10(14.7) = 8.10 + 1.47 = 9.6

Published numbers for E85 I have seen were 9.76. And I don't know if the stoich for the Maximal is different than 14.7 (maybe 14.5).

So, for max (safe) power, I would want to see richer than stoich, in the range I mentioned. And perhaps the dyno operator just has seen max power close to stoich on gas (but I would want to be richer to be safe). Use the cooling effect of the ethanol and put more fuel to it. But that may only be a secondary issue with the rings, not the prime cause.

Good luck.



I may have too much cylinder pressure as a result of the cam having 112 lobe center. I am staying away from the ethanol on this engine, and staying with race gas to be safe. But on my next build, I think I'll try to build one specifically for the E85 and match the camshaft specs to that combo. Do you have any idea about what effect mixing leaded race gas with ethanol has? Some people on this thread say it doesn't raise the octane level like you would expect, and that would account for the detonation.

Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: camastomcat] #509816
10/30/09 12:41 PM
10/30/09 12:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 292
NY
challenger451ci Offline
enthusiast
challenger451ci  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 292
NY
Quote:

Quote:

I did have one correction, with E90 the stoich A/F would be slightly lower than E85. A rough check:
Stoich Ethanol 9.0
Stoich Gasoline 14.7

E85: 0.85(9.0) + 0.15(14.7) = 7.65 + 2.21 = 9.8
E90: 0.90(9.0) + 0.10(14.7) = 8.10 + 1.47 = 9.6

Published numbers for E85 I have seen were 9.76. And I don't know if the stoich for the Maximal is different than 14.7 (maybe 14.5).

So, for max (safe) power, I would want to see richer than stoich, in the range I mentioned. And perhaps the dyno operator just has seen max power close to stoich on gas (but I would want to be richer to be safe). Use the cooling effect of the ethanol and put more fuel to it. But that may only be a secondary issue with the rings, not the prime cause.

Good luck.



I may have too much cylinder pressure as a result of the cam having 112 lobe center. I am staying away from the ethanol on this engine, and staying with race gas to be safe. But on my next build, I think I'll try to build one specifically for the E85 and match the camshaft specs to that combo. Do you have any idea about what effect mixing leaded race gas with ethanol has? Some people on this thread say it doesn't raise the octane level like you would expect, and that would account for the detonation.




I copied this from a thread on Innocate's forum:

“You guys need to know that the metallic additives used to raise the octane of gasoline lower the octane of the alcohols. TEL, TML, and MMT are pro-knock in behavior with methanol and ethanol and probably the other alcohols as well. I don’t know for a fact, but I strongly suspect, that MMT is significantly pro-knock in alcohols. I’ve seen and been told of engine wrecks that I know had methanol and MMT involved (and TEL in one).

In Obert’s book he shows the R/M octane numbers of methanol as 106/92 and ethanol as 107/89. The addition of 3ml TEL per gallon of ethanol lowers the 107 to 102. You decide what this means to you when you mix leaded race fuel with alcohol.

The octane behavior of alcohols, like any fuel except pure isooctane, is affected by the AFR. Leaner AFR = lower octane behavior. Good race fuels have well over 100-octane behavior at the worst possible AFR conditions for knock. The alcohols obviously have very low octane behavior at lean AFR’s”


One man's point of view on mixing leaded fuel with Ethanol. Hope this might help explain or get you pointed in the right direction.

Disclaimer: I found this on the internet, so take it with a grain of salt!!

Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: challenger451ci] #509817
10/30/09 01:11 PM
10/30/09 01:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Thanks, interesting reading.

I plan to stay below 14 CR and run pump E85 (summer grade only, ie 82-85%) for the lowest cost hot rod fuel I know of.

If I could get denatured ethanol (95-98%) cheap enough, I would be tempted to run that with a top end lube additive.

Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: camastomcat] #509818
10/30/09 01:14 PM
10/30/09 01:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Quote:

I am staying away from the ethanol on this engine


Have you tried richer mixtures in the carb on your other "E85" engine?

Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: 440Jim] #509819
10/30/09 04:37 PM
10/30/09 04:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline OP
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline OP
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
Quote:

Quote:

I am staying away from the ethanol on this engine


Have you tried richer mixtures in the carb on your other "E85" engine?



I did and it slowed down. All I did was took the carb off the old motor with the tune up that worked all year, and put it on the new one on the dyno. Also used the same fuel I used all year. So that is the weird thing, that it detonated.

Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: camastomcat] #509820
10/30/09 04:42 PM
10/30/09 04:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,875
communist bloc of new jersey
J
jamesc Offline
master
jamesc  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,875
communist bloc of new jersey
i'm not inferring that this had anything to do with the issues you encountered but don't forget that getting lubricating oil in the cylinders can significantly lower the octane.

Re: My B1 572 Dyno on E85 VS Sonoco Maximal [Re: jamesc] #509821
10/30/09 05:22 PM
10/30/09 05:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline OP
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline OP
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
Do you mean like oil through the rings? And if so, it should smoke. I did run an upper end lube, though.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1