Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: metalgod]
#439223
08/15/09 11:29 PM
08/15/09 11:29 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Quote:
i have a good 18 spline shifter rods etc the whole works but was wantint the overdrive isnt the passon a 3 speed with an 4th overdrive? what is the gear spread between 3rd and 4th ?
Passon od basically has the same first 3 ratios as a 727 but with an overdrive gear. 3rd gear is 1:1, 4th is .8:1. With a 3.54 gear you will NOT hit 4th gear while going down the track.
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: metalgod]
#439225
08/18/09 09:51 AM
08/18/09 09:51 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227 Tennessee
rj8806
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227
Tennessee
|
On a '70 B-body car that is already a factory 4 speed car, our shifter will come out in the factory correct location WITHOUT CUTTING the tunnel. You will have to relocate the opening the floor over to the center line but the shifter handle will still come out in the factory correct location and will fit perfectly in the console. The factory linkage will work but the bell housing will need to have the TKO bolt pattern in it and the register hole opening in the back of the bell will need to be re-sized to accept the bearing retainer of the TKO. As far as the pro's and con's verses the Passon unit or the Gear Vendors unit.....I have no real world experience with either of those so I cannot comment. I do know that Passon makes one heck of a great gearbox though. Richard Tech Support
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: rj8806]
#439227
08/18/09 06:32 PM
08/18/09 06:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,410 Wichita,KS
Blakcharger440
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,410
Wichita,KS
|
Quote:
On a '70 B-body car that is already a factory 4 speed car, our shifter will come out in the factory correct location WITHOUT CUTTING the tunnel. You will have to relocate the opening the floor over to the center line but the shifter handle will still come out in the factory correct location and will fit perfectly in the console. The factory linkage will work but the bell housing will need to have the TKO bolt pattern in it and the register hole opening in the back of the bell will need to be re-sized to accept the bearing retainer of the TKO.
As far as the pro's and con's verses the Passon unit or the Gear Vendors unit.....I have no real world experience with either of those so I cannot comment. I do know that Passon makes one heck of a great gearbox though.
Richard Tech Support
It still sounds like you have to modify the opening where the shifter comes through as per your words "You will have to relocate the opening the floor over to the center line".
So if the car in question was a 70 B-body non-console factory 4speed car would you have to modify the floor any ...or could you just install the TKO the same way you would a factory 4speed trans with no modifications to the floor or hump?
Please explain further as I am interested in a strong overdrive type trans that will install with no cutting or modifying of the floor,trans hump,etc in any way.
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: JamiePasson]
#439230
08/18/09 10:56 PM
08/18/09 10:56 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 797 arizona, usa
lokalik
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 797
arizona, usa
|
Quote:
I guess that makes the Tremec 5 speed a 4 speed with a 5th overdrive then. right?
which makes it better than a 3spd with a overdrive right?
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: Blakcharger440]
#439233
08/19/09 08:34 AM
08/19/09 08:34 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227 Tennessee
rj8806
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227
Tennessee
|
Quote:
Quote:
On a '70 B-body car that is already a factory 4 speed car, our shifter will come out in the factory correct location WITHOUT CUTTING the tunnel. You will have to relocate the opening the floor over to the center line but the shifter handle will still come out in the factory correct location and will fit perfectly in the console. The factory linkage will work but the bell housing will need to have the TKO bolt pattern in it and the register hole opening in the back of the bell will need to be re-sized to accept the bearing retainer of the TKO.
As far as the pro's and con's verses the Passon unit or the Gear Vendors unit.....I have no real world experience with either of those so I cannot comment. I do know that Passon makes one heck of a great gearbox though.
Richard Tech Support
It still sounds like you have to modify the opening where the shifter comes through as per your words "You will have to relocate the opening the floor over to the center line".
So if the car in question was a 70 B-body non-console factory 4speed car would you have to modify the floor any ...or could you just install the TKO the same way you would a factory 4speed trans with no modifications to the floor or hump?
Please explain further as I am interested in a strong overdrive type trans that will install with no cutting or modifying of the floor,trans hump,etc in any way.
As long as you already have the factory 4 speed hump in the car, the only cut you have to make is a 4 x 4 square cut, about 3" over to the right from the original shifter hole opening. Console or non console makes no difference as to the cut. The TKO is an internal linkage system and with that, we have no way around the torsion bar cross member so you have to relocate the shifter opening in the tunnel, over to the centerline of the tunnel. If you are running a console, we have an adapter that goes between the shifter handle the stub on the transmission and kicks the handle back over to the left so that it comes up in the middle of the console. A non console car is the same, you just don't use the adapter.
If the car is automatic, then yes, you do have to cut on the tunnel, OR install a 4 speed hump and remvove the metal from underneath it and then re-do the cut I mentioned above.
Richard Tech Support
Last edited by rj8806; 08/19/09 10:09 AM.
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: copchaser]
#439238
08/19/09 09:04 AM
08/19/09 09:04 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227 Tennessee
rj8806
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227
Tennessee
|
Quote:
.... If your biulding a street rod and want the modified look, then run rhe keisler set up......
Modified look??? Color me silly but I can't tell that the tunnel has been modified in the post above?
Richard Tech Support
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: rj8806]
#439239
08/19/09 09:16 AM
08/19/09 09:16 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304 Ohio
LS-300
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Ohio
|
After talking with a rep from TREMAC and playing with there TKO trany I must admit I like it. It shifted quickly and smoothly. I like the short throws and the fact that the linkage is enclosed in the case as to give more side clearance around the trany. Yes that will mean with the shifter linkage being in the centerline of the trany it will require some mods to the trany hump. You have shown what is needed on top and how nice the finished product can look but I'm wondering how much of the underside needs to be reworked. I was told the bracing that runs under an A-Body will get in the way and require "adjustment". How much adjustment is my concern. Oh and by the way the TREMAC rep recomended Keisler to go thru as you guys know what you are doing.
1979 Chrysler 300 1968 Barracuda project
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: LS-300]
#439240
08/19/09 09:56 AM
08/19/09 09:56 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227 Tennessee
rj8806
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227
Tennessee
|
Yes, A-bodies are completely different and differ from what I have posted so far in this thread. The torsion bar crossmember on an A-body car must be modified in order for the TKO to fit. Our new cross member replaces the factory one, and strengthens that area so nothing is compromised with regards to rigidity. Because the TKO is an internal linkage system, we have no way to go around the torsion bar and therefore, you must modify it to get the TKO high enough in the tunnel to connect back to the transmission cross member and keep the driveline angles correct. I have attached a pic of an A-body modification needed. The pic was from a customer of mine who was kind enough to send it to me back in '05 when I first started. Richard Tech Support
Last edited by rj8806; 08/19/09 10:11 AM.
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: metalgod]
#439243
08/19/09 02:46 PM
08/19/09 02:46 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,608 fresno ca
mikeysmopars
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,608
fresno ca
|
I have the heavy duty keisler set up in my 70 convertable challenger and absolutly love it. Shifts like butter and fifth gear cruses at 75 with ease.
Founder and CEO of the Central Valley Mopar Drag Pack
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: mikeysmopars]
#439244
08/20/09 10:41 PM
08/20/09 10:41 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166
Mass
|
Wow!,....A Keisler thread, I almost missed this one! .......(OP) Doug I know we hashed this one out before choosing a stick for your 70 Tona",......and seeing how your car is highly modified, and you like to drive'em,....IMHO the Keisler TKO is your best bang for the buck,....if you were a "numbers matching" afraid of altering the car kind of guy, the Passon box would be your only choice,.....the TKO 600/650 .64 OD 5 spd would be the optimum box for your ride based on your driveline,........I have the TKO 600/650 .64 5 spd in my personal Tona', to do it "right", factory 4 spd hump, console or not!, you need the room, my Keisler was an early prototype fit for the 68-70 B body, so I was a guinea pig for the fit, seeing that I had plenty of experience fitting other bodies with Keislers equipment,.....and while you could fit, and I have, the keisler TKO into the automatic floor tunnel, using their supplied sheetmatal adapter panel,...I've found from an installation as well as service point, that it's best to install the factory 4 spd hump, you'll need to seal up the factory 4 spd shifter hole, and relocate it's centerline approx 3" to the center of the hump from the original opening, not needed, but usefull, is to split the center transmission hump from the new shifter opening, up to the firewall/floor seam, about 18" in length, open up the floor and install a wedge measuring 2" wide tapering to a point, X 18" long, the 2" wedge being up by the firewall/floor board factory seam, after the carpet is down, or console, you'll never see the mod,....but it dose help as the Keisler is a very "tall" box,....if your running a console the shifter 68-70 styles will exit thru the factor boots, in the factory location, there's a small offset adapter that relocates the sticks properly,........you could run the factory style Z bar and assorted linkage, some fabrication/maching will be do on your part, to truly "dial-in" the linkage for correct geometry,.....I'd highly recommend the hyduralic throw-out set up, not so much to do away with any linkage issuses, but the pure simplicity, and "feel" the hyd. set up offers over the Z bar set up,.....I'd also clean up the torsion bar brace, and floorboards, tunnel area where the tranny ocuppies, of any excess factory slop of unneeded edges, flanges, ...basically smooth out the tranny area of useless sheetmetal, as the install is really tight, removeing the shift tower, 2 bolts, greatly aids in installation, it can be bolted on later in the car, from the passenger compartment, during the install, it's best to loosen the motor mount bolts (2) and let the engine tilt back, almost resting on the centerlink (use a 1/2" wood spacer between the pan/link) Doug,...on the choice of clutch, Keisler likes to "push" the diaphram set-up, which is ok for a "driver", the dual Twin, is no better, I've put it behind Hemis, with no "fondness" for it,...IMHO, if you want a bullet proof set up, although not recommended by Keisler, but offered, is the Sachs 2800 lb BorgBeck style 3 finger pressure plate, with the Sachs Kelvar single disc 11" clutch disc, that's the only set-up I prefere in my personal cars, and with the hyd set-up, you won't feel the incresed pedal effort required The new Wilwood/FEP hyd. set up is a huge improvement over the older/earlier style, and Keislers pressure testing of the cases before shipment has done away with those pesky leaks of the past Biggest do's, to assure yourself of a "perfect fit" and function Doug, is to properly dial indicate in the bell housing, Keisler recommends .005 runout Max,....but I find .001-.002 MAX much more preferable, as the TKO is extremely tight on internal tolerances, no room for slop during installation, unlike a factory 4 spd,.....driveline angle is paramont to proper fit and vibration free running, the Keisler B body tranny mount set up, puts the engine driveline well within original specs, but the shafts new length, and tailshaft length, location alter the driveline phasing, to many variables dictate what angles/ or rear axle wedge shims might be needed, based on the type of springs your running, exsisting pinion angle, as each car varys somewhat, so the need for a inclination meter is paramont, and if unaware of needed driveline angles, the Keisler supplied instructions can guide you in determining what's required, based on your readings after installation, plus Keislers employees are well versed in their product, Richard, Gene, Jeff, know their stuff,....plus many knowledgeable Keisler customers on MOparts IMHO, the Keisler TKO 5, is the best mod you can perform to your car, not only from a performance stand point, but fuel economy wise also, plus pure enjoyment of driving,.....it's no fun with 3:90-4:50 gearing on the highway,...street, Yeah! Doug, my Tona' is 440/6 equipped, 450 dynoed HP, dana 60 with 4:10's running 275/60/15,....running the TKO .64 OD "knocks" my final ratio down to 2:60 approx, that allows me 145-150 MPH at 5800 RPM, or a leasurely 80+ MPH at about 2-2200 RPM, or on long highway runs, or HotRod Power Tours state to state, I avg up to 22 MPG cruising between 70-90 MPH,....however on the street I can suck down to 10 MPG if the foot's in it!,.....and on the street the TKO behaves just like a factory 4 spd, if not better! Of all the cars I equipped for myself, or customers, I've never had an issuse with any of Keislers products, or their installs,....the only failure I had to date with Keisler products in the last 7 years was the hyd throwout bearing in my Tona',...but I must say, I beat the living crap out of the car on a regular basis, it's been on quite a few tracks around the country, been in numerous HotRod Power Tours, and tens of thousands of miles, year after year, and it's no trailer Queen, it gets driven to any event anywhere in the country Mike Doug, I know your concern, among many was the appearance of the shifter in the car, it's location, function, etc.....so here's a few pics, factory console, in the factory location, factory boot, using a Keisler repro TKO pistol grip console shifter
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: mikeysmopars]
#439245
08/20/09 10:42 PM
08/20/09 10:42 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166
Mass
|
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: DAYCLONA]
#439248
08/20/09 10:48 PM
08/20/09 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166
Mass
|
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: DAYCLONA]
#439249
08/20/09 10:49 PM
08/20/09 10:49 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166
Mass
|
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: MrAngry]
#439251
08/21/09 07:18 AM
08/21/09 07:18 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,278 San Jose, California
DennisH
Vacation
|
Vacation
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,278
San Jose, California
|
Quote:
Quote:
Yes you have to chop up your trans tunnel , I know it sucks . I almost sent it back when I seen the instructions .I dont like butchering up my car .However I like to drive it around and I got tired of fixing a 40 year old trans so i put it in . Best upgrade to my car yet . gets close to 20 on hiway now in B body with 451 in it .It shifts tight and positive , more like click click . I wouldnt waste my money on a 45 year trans anymore .
Agreed.
Same here. I wish that the 6-Speed in the new Challenger worked as good as the Keisler/Tremec TKO in the Coronet.
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: DAYCLONA]
#439252
08/21/09 08:07 AM
08/21/09 08:07 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227 Tennessee
rj8806
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227
Tennessee
|
Mike: As always, thanks for the positive, honest comments. The only thing I question with regard to your response is the part where you said you had to split the tunnel, about 18" long up to the firewall? If the car is an automatic, then yes, you have to cut as I pointed out. If the car already has a factory 4 speed hump, there is no cutting, other than to move the shifter over to the centerline. Did you make the extra cut for added assurance? The machining we do nowadays is alot different from what we did in the past. Our machining has even changed a few times since I've been (started January 2005)here. Richard Tech Support
|
|
|
Re: keisler 5 speed good bad ugly???
[Re: rj8806]
#439253
08/21/09 08:48 AM
08/21/09 08:48 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,166
Mass
|
Quote:
Mike: As always, thanks for the positive, honest comments.
The only thing I question with regard to your response is the part where you said you had to split the tunnel, about 18" long up to the firewall? If the car is an automatic, then yes, you have to cut as I pointed out. If the car already has a factory 4 speed hump, there is no cutting, other than to move the shifter over to the centerline.
Did you make the extra cut for added assurance?
The machining we do nowadays is alot different from what we did in the past. Our machining has even changed a few times since I've been (started January 2005)here.
Richard Tech Support
Richard,
my car was originaly automatic, when I recieved the TKO 600 for the install, like I said it was an early prototype fitting, as well as the shifter, Shafi wanted me to fit it as he intended, based on mock ups at Keisler, which I did, and as I stated it was possible, but after the initial fit, I felt more clearance was needed, esp on top of the tranny, it was very tight, the addition of the factory 4 spd hump is just more beneficial for access, and getting some air around the tranny, as it puts off some serious heat in OD mode on extended drives at high speeds, the centerline of the factory floor will be the same, regardless of the transmission application, as factory 4 spd cars started life with an automatic floor prior to the hump install, but again as I stated above in my initial post, the wedge wasn't really needed, but I desired it,.
I know some of the newer Keisler TKO's have been trimmed of excess "fat" not needed as far as the cases go
Mike
|
|
|
|
|