Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Superbird Nose Cones #381582
07/20/09 09:26 PM
07/20/09 09:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
M
mopar4ya Offline OP
master
mopar4ya  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
Would anyone be able to school me on an original nose cone vs the steal repo ones that are being offered today. If you have the 2 side by side, can you pick the repo from the original? And if so. how.

Thanks
Dan.

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: mopar4ya] #381583
07/20/09 11:43 PM
07/20/09 11:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
Well if you were comparing an original to say a Gene Gregory or Jack McGaughey steel replicas, the nicely finished, well put together, ones would be the repros,....an original is rather "crude", generally they are very sloppy were the rubber bump strip covers the top skin roll over, and the center section, and corners are joined, the seam work is also rather hap hazzard around the top skin roll over,.....Gregorys noses are die struck, Jack McG's are hand formed/english wheeled/ hand corked very much like how the originals were formed on Kirksite forms, Jack has a "modern" version "ureathane compound" form, to "form" his repro pcs on

Gregorys/McGaugheys cones are works of art compared to originals/NOS,.......if you think your looking at an NOS, be wary,......as NOS in wingcar parts often leaves a lot to be desired, because a lot of the parts were hand formed, or farmed out to vendors in non automotive businesses to defray the parts cost to build these cars, the parts often deligated to NOS stature were rejects,.....I've seen a lot of NOS wingcar parts over the years that were basically useless, or need a little to major work to be usable,.....nosecones included

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: DAYCLONA] #381584
07/21/09 12:40 AM
07/21/09 12:40 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,484
Minneapolis, MN
H
hemi70se Offline
top fuel
hemi70se  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,484
Minneapolis, MN
Well I just sold my NOS nosecone and I would have to disagree with you about the factory ones being sloppy. Mine still had very nicely done lead work and the spot welded area under the bumper strip looked very nice also.
I also wonder what these repro guys used for a template. Did they take measurements off an NOS cone? I doubt it, likely got measurements off one 30 year old cone thats been bumped a few times.
I'll take a real cone that needs a little work before I'd take a repro.

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: hemi70se] #381585
07/21/09 03:16 AM
07/21/09 03:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,190
A Red State
SNK-EYZ Offline
I Live Here
SNK-EYZ  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,190
A Red State
Quote:

Well I just sold my NOS nosecone and I would have to disagree with you about the factory ones being sloppy. Mine still had very nicely done lead work and the spot welded area under the bumper strip looked very nice also.
I also wonder what these repro guys used for a template. Did they take measurements off an NOS cone? I doubt it, likely got measurements off one 30 year old cone thats been bumped a few times.
I'll take a real cone that needs a little work before I'd take a repro.




NOS doesn't mean perfect, it just means 'New Old Stock". I've seen NOS parts that look perfect and ones that look worse than used..

From what I remember Gene told me (25+ years ago) that he made the patterns off of perfect undamaged noses.
Back then he was having them made on an English wheel, he may have had dies to stamp them out since then.


Kayse can't keep up at all now. lol
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: DAYCLONA] #381586
07/21/09 10:49 AM
07/21/09 10:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,778
North Dakota
6PakBee Online content
I Live Here
6PakBee  Online Content
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,778
North Dakota
Quote:

.......an original is rather "crude", generally they are very sloppy were the rubber bump strip covers the top skin roll over, and the center section, and corners are joined, the seam work is also rather hap hazzard around the top skin roll over.....




On my Superbird you can see what appears to be spot welds on the sides that start at the top of the nose and move down to the bottom. If you look at one side versus the other where the sides transition into the front of the nose, the contours of the two sides don't match.


"We live in a time when intelligent people are being silenced so that stupid people won't be offended".
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: DAYCLONA] #381587
07/21/09 11:54 AM
07/21/09 11:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
A
Aero426 Offline
I Live Here
Aero426  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
Quote:

Well NOS,.......if you think your looking at an NOS, be wary,......as NOS in wingcar parts often leaves a lot to be desired, because a lot of the parts were hand formed, or farmed out to vendors in non automotive businesses to defray the parts cost to build these cars, the parts often deligated to NOS stature were rejects,.....I've seen a lot of NOS wingcar parts over the years that were basically useless, or need a little to major work to be usable,.....nosecones included




Mike, we have had six NOS noses pass through our hands over the years. They came from the back door at Creative. Of them, I have one left and for full disclosure, it's for sale. I have never had ANYONE complain about fit or finish on a nose they bought. I would have to challenge you on your statement that NOS wing car parts were "rejects".

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381588
07/21/09 12:16 PM
07/21/09 12:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,683
The Historic Hudson Valley
MONC Offline
master
MONC  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,683
The Historic Hudson Valley
Maybe Doug can provide some close up pics of an NOS nose if he has some, and someone else close up pics of a repro nose for comparison.

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: MONC] #381589
07/21/09 12:39 PM
07/21/09 12:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
A
Aero426 Offline
I Live Here
Aero426  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
There is no doubt that the repop noses are very nice looking. I don't have anything bad to say about them.

In the case where Jack McGaughey has your car on site and can personally fit his nose to it, I am sure you could get a better fit than factory. If Jack or Gean ships you a nose, I don't know that there is any guarantee it will or won't fit better than a factory piece.

A repro nose will definitely cost less. If cost is a concern, I don't see anything wrong going repro. That said, the real deal is still the real deal. Some people will not want a reproduction piece of sheet metal on their car if a factory part is available.

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381590
07/21/09 03:30 PM
07/21/09 03:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
W
WINGCARS_6970 Offline
master
WINGCARS_6970  Offline
master
W

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
This was for sale sometime back as a NOS nose cone

And I cant say with 100% certainity but I thought it was someone I knew with a daytona or superbird
N.O.S nose that there was something you had transfer from the old nose to the new one.As it was a replacement part


1969 Daytona 440 L9B410772 1970 Coronet 500 383 Presently owned 1970 Superbird 440 U 166242 1970 Superbird 440 U 174597 1970 Superbird 440-6 V 179697 1970 Coronet RT 440 U 224126 1968 Road Runner 426 J 134509 1970 Daytona Replica 318 G 178701
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: hemi70se] #381591
07/21/09 04:31 PM
07/21/09 04:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
Quote:

Well I just sold my NOS nosecone and I would have to disagree with you about the factory ones being sloppy. Mine still had very nicely done lead work and the spot welded area under the bumper strip looked very nice also.
I also wonder what these repro guys used for a template. Did they take measurements off an NOS cone? I doubt it, likely got measurements off one 30 year old cone thats been bumped a few times.
I'll take a real cone that needs a little work before I'd take a repro.







Yes some NOS cones can be assembled very nicely,.....I recall 2 examples, amonst others, that I 've seen over the years that were nicely done, both for customers who had purschased them for their restorations,....NOS cone #1 looked beautiful,.....only problem was the front grille opening, should have measures 24" +/- 1/8" X 8 1/2" +/- 1/16,....it measured 23 5/8" wide X 8" high,....a factory grille would NEVER fit,....I had to customize one of my repro steel SB grilles to fit,........nosecone #2 was purchased from a California parts dealer, nice NOS cone, which when fitted to the car was 1 1/2" too narrow in witdh, it had to be cut and widened at the upswept outer edges at the nose to fender/hood lines to fit, and I've experienced that with a Daytona NOS cone as well,....along with a host of other NOS wingcar part maladies that customers send me

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381592
07/21/09 05:12 PM
07/21/09 05:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
Mike, we have had six NOS noses pass through our hands over the years. They came from the back door at Creative. Of them, I have one left and for full disclosure, it's for sale. I have never had ANYONE complain about fit or finish on a nose they bought. I would have to challenge you on your statement that NOS wing car parts were "rejects".





Doug, I'm not saying EVERY NOS wingcar part is reject,.......if someone thinks that NOS means perfect, they're wrong, some "NOS" peices were line rejects, simple fact being they woundn't/didn't fit without required rework, which wasn't a viable decision,....so the peice(s) go into the Dealer supply system, the dealer has the time to fit the part, or transfer exsisting pcs onto the "rejected" NOS unit,....whereas the assy line didn't have the time for such retrofit......Doug you may have had 6 cones go thru your "hands" over the years, but how many were actually used?,or just stored away, just incase something happened, how many have been continusouly traded/sold amongst collectors of wingcar/NOS stuff over the decades?........In fact Doug, the NOS cone with the reduced grille size opening that I mentioned in my above post, was purchased by the owner thru one of the SB clubs many years ago, whether it was yours or Georges site, I don't recall those details, just that he mentioned he bought it thru one of the SB clubs offerings,.....I don't follow the hoopla of car numbers, or there history, but this customers car was purchased in NJ, white 440/6 auto car, smashed in the nose, purchased and transported to California where it has sat for many years, now finially undergoing restoration,

I was just recently sent a pair of NOS light buckets, and NOS piviots from a customer to "fix",.... the light buckets were really "nice", one bucket end that was welded on was done with the bucket severly twisted, no amount of untwisting was going to help it out, plus the end plate was spotted on clocked out of alignment, the drivers bucket had a passenger end plate welded on to it, so the cams recieving studs were inboard,...the owner transfered the studs to the ouside, painted it all nice and everything, then found out that the recessed area of the plate needed to be outboard, not inboard,for the piviot to clear with the outer door attached, so a correct repro outboard driver's plate had to be fabricated to replace the "NOS" reject,....the piviots were NOS, they were only the face plates?, they were missing the arms, and the center piviot arms as well, I had to repro several parts to complete/correct the NOS parts,( I don't recall, or have seen any part numbers that allowed you to purchase piviot arms seperately?, or face plates seperately?, if a wingcar busted up so bad, it needed piviot faceplates, you think the arms would survive? why would a "NOS" peice be built like that, missing key pcs? )....these owners where under the impression most people are regarding NOS,...that it better or perfect, it ain't!......I seen a lot of parts, (wingcar) that people send me over the years, plus decades back, when I was tooling for repro wingcar parts, I made a few mistakes tooling off NOS parts that I borrowed/purchased,.....I found that seasoned, on the car parts were the best canidates to repro from,....and not just one canidate, you needed to compare as many examples as you could, as they varied car to car,........generally when I have a wingcar customer call me to assemble either their parts or car, and they boost about their extensive collection of NOS part they have accumulated for their restoration, I generally cringe at the thought of NOS wingar parts, only because I have to de-flate the owners illusion of how great the parts aren't, and what additional work is required to correct/complete them,.....don't get me wrong, NOS parts are more enjoyable than busted up/rusted originals that people send me, wanting a miracle,.....but with wingcar NOS parts, I find it a 50/50 gamble that they will fit out of the "box"

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: hemi70se] #381593
07/21/09 05:48 PM
07/21/09 05:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass

I also wonder what these repro guys used for a template. Did they take measurements off an NOS cone? I doubt it, likely got measurements off one 30 year old cone thats been bumped a few times.
I'll take a real cone that needs a little work before I'd take a repro.







Dirk,......I can speak for myself and Jack McGaughey, after speaking,working with, and utilizing each others parts in our respective customers restorations, and comparing "notes" if you will,.....restoring one or two wingcars may make a person qualified to answer assembly questions, but reproducing wingcar parts is a completely different endeavor, those sussesful at it, are so, because they've taken the time to compare NOS, and original parts, many of them, many times over,.....wingcar parts are in a "leaque" all their own because of the nature they were fabricated in,....Jack McGaughey, like myself has found that inorder to produce a viable part that will fit, you need to average from as many samples of original/NOS pcs as you can, regardless of the peice being reproed, you them tool a peice that "falls" within the min and max, of what has been recorded deminsion wise,....to apease the customers who purchase a part expecting it to fit, or fit with minimal adjustment(s),.....granted when a customers car is on-site undergoing restoration, parts can be "surgicaly" tuned/fabricated to fit precisely,.........The majority of the original wingcar parts were either handmade, or hand tweaked/assembled after stamping/forming/etc,.....so human error, and interpetation leaves each and every peice open to a subtle, or radical change in shape/deminsion,.......wingcar parts weren't as "cookie cutter" as standard Chrysler/Vendor assembly line parts/assys were

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381594
07/21/09 06:22 PM
07/21/09 06:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
I would have to challenge you on your statement that NOS wing car parts were "rejects".






Doug, I could write a book, (looks like I'm doing that on this post ),....I've dealt with a lot of customers, bodyshops, restoration shops over the last 2 decades, either selling them repro parts, repairing original parts, or NOS parts, or correcting other venders repro parts, assembling them, retrofiting them, etc, the list goes on,....but usually the NOS "reject" parts stand out in your memories,......last year I had a body shop in Virginia call me wanting a grille screen and attaching hardware for a NOS grille frame they had for a customers daytona, I sent the stuff, now they wanted to know how to install it,....after a few pics, it was obvious the "NOS" grille frame lacked the welded on top hidden studs, and no counterpunched holes on the bottom for the scews,....so they ended up sending me the "rejected NOS" frame for "adjustment",.........

I think I going to start documenting a photo journal dedicated to "Reject NOS wingcar" stuff,....I'll start with one of my 1969 NOS Daytona fenders, passenger side I have, that has a stamped depression for a 70 marker light, but was never cut out

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: DAYCLONA] #381595
07/21/09 06:41 PM
07/21/09 06:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
M
mopar4ya Offline OP
master
mopar4ya  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
Guys, thanks for the great information. As some of you know I have had 3 Birds here for close to 25 years all waiting for a restoration. I have been collecting parts for years and up in the air on nose cones. I have a total of 6 cones, ranging from junk to less than fair. If I take all 6 I can probably piece together 2 cones. I would like to have 1 cone that is nice. Trying to decide on buying a original that needs a little work, or buying a repo. All the info is helpful.

Thanks !!
Dan

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: DAYCLONA] #381596
07/21/09 06:47 PM
07/21/09 06:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
M
mopar4ya Offline OP
master
mopar4ya  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
Quote:

I would have to challenge you on your statement that NOS wing car parts were "rejects".






Doug, I could write a book, (looks like I'm doing that on this post ),....I've dealt with a lot of customers, bodyshops, restoration shops over the last 2 decades, either selling them repro parts, repairing original parts, or NOS parts, or correcting other venders repro parts, assembling them, retrofiting them, etc, the list goes on,....but usually the NOS "reject" parts stand out in your memories,......last year I had a body shop in Virginia call me wanting a grille screen and attaching hardware for a NOS grille frame they had for a customers daytona, I sent the stuff, now they wanted to know how to install it,....after a few pics, it was obvious the "NOS" grille frame lacked the welded on top hidden studs, and no counterpunched holes on the bottom for the scews,....so they ended up sending me the "rejected NOS" frame for "adjustment",.........

I think I going to start documenting a photo journal dedicated to "Reject NOS wingcar" stuff,....I'll start with one of my 1969 NOS Daytona fenders, passenger side I have, that has a stamped depression for a 70 marker light, but was never cut out




LOL, I have a NOS Daytona fender with the fender scoop hole in the wrong location.

Dan

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: DAYCLONA] #381597
07/21/09 08:04 PM
07/21/09 08:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
A
Aero426 Offline
I Live Here
Aero426  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
Quote:

I think I going to start documenting a photo journal dedicated to "Reject NOS wingcar" stuff,....I'll start with one of my 1969 NOS Daytona fenders, passenger side I have, that has a stamped depression for a 70 marker light, but was never cut out




That fender is very likely a race part. I've seen a Daytona nose with stamped outlines for the headlights that remained unopened. That nose came direct from Don White's shop so it's pretty clear why it was that way. I would hesitate to label that nose as a reject. It just is what it is and was not intended for a street car.

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: mopar4ya] #381598
07/21/09 08:10 PM
07/21/09 08:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624
Fort Worth, Texas
xs29j8 Offline
master
xs29j8  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624
Fort Worth, Texas
When I talked to Gean Gregory at Monster Mopar last year, he said that there were differences in the recessed flange that mounts the grille frame... I do not recall what the differences were... Anyone know what they are?

XS

5367161-KandK01.jpg (709 downloads)
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381599
07/21/09 08:18 PM
07/21/09 08:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
A
Aero426 Offline
I Live Here
Aero426  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
Quote:

In fact Doug, the NOS cone with the reduced grille size opening that I mentioned in my above post, was purchased by the owner thru one of the SB clubs many years ago, whether it was yours or Georges site, I don't recall those details, just that he mentioned he bought it thru one of the SB clubs offerings,




Please note that the NOS grille frame sits in the NOS nose opening like it is supposed to.

5367183-P7218108.JPG (571 downloads)
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: mopar4ya] #381600
07/21/09 08:24 PM
07/21/09 08:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass

I think I going to start documenting a photo journal dedicated to "Reject NOS wingcar" stuff,....I'll start with one of my 1969 NOS Daytona fenders, passenger side I have, that has a stamped depression for a 70 marker light, but was never cut out




LOL, I have a NOS Daytona fender with the fender scoop hole in the wrong location.

Dan






Dan, my NOS passenger 1969 Daytona fender, has a dished depression where they struck for a 1970 side marker, but never cut it open for the light to be inserted,.......I'm only guessing, but I would assume the fender was late in the Daytona assy timeline, but early for 1970 Charger production, maybe a prefit test peice for 70 Charger production, but got converted to Daytona conversion, never had the top hole cut, no radio antenee hole either, and no 70 Charger headlite frame spotted to it either, plus is missing a few fender mounting slots, never punched out.....It got rejected either from Creative or Chrysler for use, but got put into the Dealer parts network, ......I "bought" the fender from a bodyshop that was repairing a crash damaged restored 69 Charger 500, they purchased the fender from a Dodge dealership out west, via the internet that told them they had a NOS fender for a 69 Charger aero car .....a friend of a friend, asked me to look at it, and help the body guy out, as he was told by the cars owner, that the 500's fenders were special, and converted by the factory, and what he had,he said no way he could make work! ......so after I saw the fender, I knew what it was for, told him he had the wrong fender, the customer was charged/paid $1000 for the NOS fender! (1996 price) so I quietly traded the body man a used 69 Charger fender to repair the car, so he wouldn't be in deep do-do with the customer, as the NOS purchjase was final,.......so another lesson, you never know what goes on in the bodyshop, if your not informed!

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: DAYCLONA] #381601
07/21/09 09:16 PM
07/21/09 09:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
M
mopar4ya Offline OP
master
mopar4ya  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
Something else I have noticed over the years. Why are some NOS cones gray and others red in primer Were there different venders making these, or just used what ever primer was on sale that week?

Thanks
Dan

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: mopar4ya] #381602
07/21/09 09:34 PM
07/21/09 09:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
W
WINGCARS_6970 Offline
master
WINGCARS_6970  Offline
master
W

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
There was these valance pieces that were suspected as repo /or original .When they were on ebay
Re: Original Daytona parts on ebay
« Reply #19 on: January 28, 2009, 11:54:53 AM » Quote Modify

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That was my original thought prototype or pre production pieces.I knew they were not superbird as they appeared .As to the contour and surface area

Quote from: nascarxx29 on December 29, 2008, 08:03:55 AM
JohnTPR forwarded this to me . I thought that they were salvaged from a damaged whole valance.Or maybe old templates used from past engineering vendor?? Parts are in MI


Quote from: nascarxx29 on December 29, 2008, 12:09:27 PM
Early prototypes? With no sidemarker cuts .The earliest daytona had stick on reflectors and taped headlight door openings.Wish the guy furnished more info in the description other than they sat on the shelves for years

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-dodg...1QQcmdZViewItem

Re: Original Daytona parts on ebay
« Reply #18 on: January 28, 2009, 11:47:46 AM » Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The guy that bought those valance halves called me about a week ago, and we had a long chat. He and I came to the conclusion that they MIGHT be race Daytona parts. More specifically, we thought that was the most likely of the possibilities due to the missing marker light recesses. There's a very slight possibility that it was a pre-production mockup piece, since I have pictures of a prototype/mockup car which has no marker lights on its valance. From what he was saying, this does not appear to be a reproduction part, due to how it was stamped/formed. The weird part is that the valance is in two pieces. He was going to look closer at the joint between the two pieces, and also take a closer look at the gauge and type of metal itself.

I was thinking that a guy like Greg Kwiatkowski, who is (re-)building the actual #88 Daytona, could make good use of these. Steve, the guy that bought the parts through eBay, was debating about adding the marker light recess and using them on a real Daytona. Either way, the valance was not made to go on a regular "street" Daytona - but that does not necessarily mean it's a reproduction.


1969 Daytona 440 L9B410772 1970 Coronet 500 383 Presently owned 1970 Superbird 440 U 166242 1970 Superbird 440 U 174597 1970 Superbird 440-6 V 179697 1970 Coronet RT 440 U 224126 1968 Road Runner 426 J 134509 1970 Daytona Replica 318 G 178701
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381603
07/21/09 09:37 PM
07/21/09 09:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
Quote:

Quote:

I think I going to start documenting a photo journal dedicated to "Reject NOS wingcar" stuff,....I'll start with one of my 1969 NOS Daytona fenders, passenger side I have, that has a stamped depression for a 70 marker light, but was never cut out




That fender is very likely a race part. I've seen a Daytona nose with stamped outlines for the headlights that remained unopened. That nose came direct from Don White's shop so it's pretty clear why it was that way. I would hesitate to label that nose as a reject. It just is what it is and was not intended for a street car.







I've seen, and had my share of the Wingcar "race" parts Doug, usually the skins, are just that "skins"....no inner stuctures/braces/plates/etc what so-ever, as they didn't need it,....I have 5 NOS Daytona fenders, they are pretty much fully structured bolt on pcs,....not race pcs,.....just that some have various qwerks in their completeness, and or conversion

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: mopar4ya] #381604
07/21/09 09:50 PM
07/21/09 09:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
Quote:

Something else I have noticed over the years. Why are some NOS cones gray and others red in primer Were there different venders making these, or just used what ever primer was on sale that week?

Thanks
Dan








In the winger world, anything is possible ,.....but generally with NOS sheetmetal, any Chrysler stock, not necessarly wingcar stuff, red primered parts are much later down the timeline of production/supply.......I generally find Gray primered, or bare(rust) NOS wingar parts as being early releases for production/supply,......I've seen a few red primered pcs over the years,....I've seen one SB NOS cone, that was brushed in red primer?.......the owner claimed he purchased it from a closing dealer as it was?

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381605
07/21/09 10:19 PM
07/21/09 10:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
Please note that the NOS grille frame sits in the NOS nose opening like it is supposed to.








That's .......A matched set, should have no issuses there, just FYI, about 2 or more years ago when I discussed SB grille frames with Jack McGaughey, as he was contemplating making them, and I was already tooling for them, we discussed the problems with forming them, requirements, etc.....Jack wasn't surprised, just amazed at the variations in measurements from the more than several originals he had on hand, plus others he had measured when he had access to them,......he was curious on how I arrive at a "finished", or finialized deminsion to begin tooling for a part,.....and it's like I mentioned in an earlier post,.....you choose the median of all recorded deminsions you have access to, used or NOS



I remember a decade or more back when I tooled up for Daytona grille frames, I made the mistake of using an NOS grille frame, that I borrowed, the first half dozen grille frames went in the trash heap, along with the prints and tooling, because they didn't fit any nose,original or rebop, they were to short in coverage by 1/4" top to bottom, luckly I didn't release any out at the time!,.......I always made it a habit of test fitting parts, before produceing them, but I too fall victim of assumeing NOS parts fit, because their NOS,....Most of the time they do, but.....you never know until your assembling the entire assy, if it's going to have issuses?

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: xs29j8] #381606
07/21/09 10:37 PM
07/21/09 10:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,160
Mass
Quote:

When I talked to Gean Gregory at Monster Mopar last year, he said that there were differences in the recessed flange that mounts the grille frame... I do not recall what the differences were... Anyone know what they are?

XS






Perhaps Gene was talking about Superbird grille openings,....Daytonas are pretty much consistant (which is surpriseing!),.....over the decades of templateing/measuring/and taking molds off nosecones,.....the Superbirds are perhaps the worst for having a consistant opening,.......I've probally made/sold easly (lost count) over a hundred steel Daytona grille frame/screen assemblies, and never one complaint or issuse of fit,.....the superbirds on the other hand, even after determining a "median" tooling demension, I have some customers who claim it's too tight, or too loose in their grille opening,.....so the last few SB repro grille frames have been made with the customers suppling their grille openings measuement,.....and they vary greatly, not only in height and width, but side to side, across, or up or down! measurement wise,..........one of the reasons I dread tooling for the SB directional frames that complement the grille,....I've had access to a few NOS pcs, and a few original sets, and their all over the place shape wise and measurement wise and unlike my SB grille tooling, would leave me little room to adjust to desired customer specs, if and when I decide to release them

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: DAYCLONA] #381607
07/21/09 10:59 PM
07/21/09 10:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
A
Aero426 Offline
I Live Here
Aero426  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
Quote:


That's .......A matched set, should have no issuses there,




Just to be clear, that Bird grille frame is a random sample I grabbed to a random nose. It's a matched set now, but it sure wasn't earlier this evening. Taking a quick measurement, the NOS nose width at the fender peaks matches the nose on my Bird very closely. As close as I can measure it by myself, it's dead on.

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: mopar4ya] #381608
07/21/09 11:03 PM
07/21/09 11:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
A
Aero426 Offline
I Live Here
Aero426  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
Quote:

Something else I have noticed over the years. Why are some NOS cones gray and others red in primer Were there different venders making these, or just used what ever primer was on sale that week?

Thanks
Dan




All of mine have been bare steel in cosmolene. I also have a Bird hood and 70 RR decklid that were delivered in bare steel with no protection.


Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381609
07/22/09 06:06 AM
07/22/09 06:06 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
W
WINGCARS_6970 Offline
master
WINGCARS_6970  Offline
master
W

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
This statement made by superbirdtom .I what I refered to early on .You had to remove a bracket .From old nose to N.O.S. one replacing it

superbirdtom
Full Member

Offline

Posts: 242


Re: N.O.S. Superbird Nose Cone Tech VS/ Repos
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 11:06:07 PM » Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
just to add to all the previous well coverd posts. I believe the difference is that the replacement cones if you ordered one from the dealer back in the day they didn't come with the piece that mmounts the top side of the cone to the rad support. you had to take it off the damaged one ant reweld it onto the replacement one.

And I believe that the ones that came on the cars delivered some had wiring holders that are tacked to the interior of the cone to hold the hoses and h-light wires . I believe i have seen them with and without them as a difference between stock and repop. the steel repops look damn good in my opinion.


1969 Daytona 440 L9B410772 1970 Coronet 500 383 Presently owned 1970 Superbird 440 U 166242 1970 Superbird 440 U 174597 1970 Superbird 440-6 V 179697 1970 Coronet RT 440 U 224126 1968 Road Runner 426 J 134509 1970 Daytona Replica 318 G 178701
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: WINGCARS_6970] #381610
07/23/09 12:02 PM
07/23/09 12:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
W
WINGCARS_6970 Offline
master
WINGCARS_6970  Offline
master
W

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
Re: N.O.S. Superbird Nose Cone Tech VS/ Repos
« Reply #5 on: Today at 07:48:46 AM » Quote Mopar John


[Here is a picture of my NOS Superbird nosecone. It is missing the closure panel. While I'm on this topic I would like to add my thoughts on the NOS vs REPRO debate. If you have a quality original car NOS is the way to go. If your building a clone thats where the repro parts belong. There are more clones going together than originals being restored and if they use up the rare parts on the clones it's sad. When you use NOS parts on your restoration be sure to include pictures of the parts with the box or label and as they are installed on the car. Also keep your receipts. Later if you decide to sell and you can prove you used NOS vs repro it will make a big differance even though it doesn't look much differant.



1969 Daytona 440 L9B410772 1970 Coronet 500 383 Presently owned 1970 Superbird 440 U 166242 1970 Superbird 440 U 174597 1970 Superbird 440-6 V 179697 1970 Coronet RT 440 U 224126 1968 Road Runner 426 J 134509 1970 Daytona Replica 318 G 178701
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: WINGCARS_6970] #381611
07/23/09 12:13 PM
07/23/09 12:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
W
WINGCARS_6970 Offline
master
WINGCARS_6970  Offline
master
W

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
So if you have a beyond salvage nose cone and you dont have that piece to transfer over.That I refered to earlier .As in the picture .That might or might not be on your NOS nose.What do you do??


1969 Daytona 440 L9B410772 1970 Coronet 500 383 Presently owned 1970 Superbird 440 U 166242 1970 Superbird 440 U 174597 1970 Superbird 440-6 V 179697 1970 Coronet RT 440 U 224126 1968 Road Runner 426 J 134509 1970 Daytona Replica 318 G 178701
Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: WINGCARS_6970] #381612
07/23/09 12:44 PM
07/23/09 12:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
A
Aero426 Offline
I Live Here
Aero426  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
Quote:

So if you have a beyond salvage nose cone and you dont have that piece to transfer over.That I refered to earlier .As in the picture .That might or might not be on your NOS nose.What do you do??




You make the piece on a sheet metal brake or buy one from Jack or Gean. That's the easy part.

Re: Superbird Nose Cones [Re: Aero426] #381613
07/23/09 01:46 PM
07/23/09 01:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
W
WINGCARS_6970 Offline
master
WINGCARS_6970  Offline
master
W

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,595
TX , NJ , FL
Guess thats all you can do .Unless the metal nosecone vendors being as nose is made up in sections .Sell you that individual piece you need.Or any other section you might need


1969 Daytona 440 L9B410772 1970 Coronet 500 383 Presently owned 1970 Superbird 440 U 166242 1970 Superbird 440 U 174597 1970 Superbird 440-6 V 179697 1970 Coronet RT 440 U 224126 1968 Road Runner 426 J 134509 1970 Daytona Replica 318 G 178701
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1