Re: Hotchkis SwayBar kits... Anyone try them?
[Re: FuryBoy]
#377596
07/16/09 08:23 PM
07/16/09 08:23 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
I wouldn't be afraid of their stuff. I don't have any experience with their classic car stuff, but on the 97-04 Dakota's they had a killer kit that would lower the trucks, and add on sway bars that made them handle like a corvette. I don't have their sway bars, I just have their lowering springs on my dakota, but everyone I talk to that has their full kit--coil/leaf springs, shocks, and front/rear sways, loves how the hotchkis stuff made their trucks handle. I'm more than happy with how my big block dakota rides with their springs. Don't be afraid of them! ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beer.gif)
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: Hotchkis SwayBar kits... Anyone try them?
[Re: FuryBoy]
#377597
07/16/09 08:45 PM
07/16/09 08:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,490 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,490
So Cal
|
Quote:
I am looking to get some front and rear sway bars for my '70 Challenger. Currently I have Firm Feel 1.0 inch torsion bars and XHD springs out back. The only thing that scares me about the hotckis bars is they are 1 1/4 front, 3/4 rear. The rear seems about right, but wouldn't 1 1/8 inch be better balanced?
This is just a small block street car that I want to handle as well as possible with stock components. No XV crap... Not that it's not good stuff, very well may be, but I just don't have the money to spend on that kind of thing...
The hotchkis kits seem fairly complete... I was thinking about maybe just getting the rear bar and then a hellwig for the front since they are considerably cheaper...
The hotchkis bar is hollow tube. You loose a little stifness with that. Some say a hollow 1 1/4 is like a 1 1/8 others say its like a 1 3/16".
The geometry of the bar has an affect on the stiffness too. The fronts have the stock geometry, but the rear are of Hotchkis and Hellwig design respectively. So comparing the diameters of those rear bars to a stock bar is very unlikely to be accurate.
Addco used to make a 1 1/4 solid bar. Heavy as heck.
The balance would be fine with 1" T-bars. And the Hellwig and Hotchkis rear bars are adjustable to fine tune the balance to the type of track, racing, or personal driving style.
Hotchkis is hosting an All Mopar Open house and Q & A this Saturday at there facility in Santa Fe Spring, Ca.
If you have any specific questions, I might be able to ask them in the Q & A session.
Read here.
https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...e=0#Post5287830
|
|
|
Re: Hotchkis SwayBar kits... Anyone try them?
[Re: SomeCarGuy]
#377599
07/16/09 10:06 PM
07/16/09 10:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,490 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,490
So Cal
|
Quote:
There was an article a few years back in I think PHR that covered those bars. The before and after showed a great increase in handling, if you believe the media.
Increase diameter sway bar WILL make a great increase in handling.
About any brand will. But some weigh more than others, have stiffness adjustments, and have superior attachment hardware than others.
The new Hellwig and Hotchkis rear bars have dog bone style end links. The traditional donut washer style bushing are very sensitive to where you place the frame bracket. If the bracket is of just a little the sway bar will have preload in it while the car is at rest.
The dog bone style end links have freedom of fore and aft movement and will not bind in those directions. Also that design allows for adjustable rear sway bar stiffness. The three holes in the Helwig and Hotchkis rear sway bars offer three stiffness settings.
The only bummer on those two rear bar designs is that they are axle mounted. That has addition unspring weight and sometimes makes it a pain to use jackstands under you axle tubes. But weight is reduced on those rear bars because they are hollow design.
The Firm Feel rear sway bar is frame mounted like the original E-body rear sway bar were. The install is a little more involved but the finished result is very clean. They don't have the unsprung weight, but they don't offer an adjustment feature.
The addco rear bar is axle mounts and has old style end donut end links. It's tricky to get the frame mount drilled in the right location so as not to bind up the end links. Tough to do because the frame is at a 45 degree angle to the ground at that place.
I think that covers the major difference in the major rear sway bar offerings on the market now.
|
|
|
Re: Hotchkis SwayBar kits... Anyone try them?
[Re: autoxcuda]
#377606
08/02/09 12:15 AM
08/02/09 12:15 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 102 Virginia
MACDiesel
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 102
Virginia
|
I'm sold. For discusion sake, have you seen the Comp Engineering universal bars? They work like the XV's and mount through the frame. They're splined NASCAR style.
-1967 Belvedere II 440/4speed
|
|
|
Re: Hotchkis SwayBar kits... Anyone try them?
[Re: MACDiesel]
#377607
08/02/09 12:33 AM
08/02/09 12:33 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,490 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,490
So Cal
|
Quote:
I'm sold. For discusion sake, have you seen the Comp Engineering universal bars? They work like the XV's and mount through the frame. They're splined NASCAR style.
Lot of fabrication you'd be on your own to fit. A big fiasco. At some point you have to say when is enough.
On a stock 66-69 K-frame you'd have to put in front of the K-member and you'd really have to rug up something for the support at the ends. I don't think it would be pretty. Not pretty at all.
On a 70-72B, 70-74, and 73-76A body k frame it would be easier. Still a lot of work. There are other things that just come first, IMHO.
|
|
|
Re: Hotchkis SwayBar kits... Anyone try them?
[Re: autoxcuda]
#377608
08/02/09 12:43 AM
08/02/09 12:43 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 102 Virginia
MACDiesel
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 102
Virginia
|
Yeah, I figured. Save those for the race cars.
-1967 Belvedere II 440/4speed
|
|
|
|
|