Re: 383 problems.
[Re: superbeedave]
#350836
06/18/09 11:15 AM
06/18/09 11:15 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,220 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,220
Someplace you aren't
|
I went from 10 to 12 on my 383 and it caused exactly what you are seeing on yours. I'm putting it back at 10 since it doesn't seem to run any better and I hate how it hangs up in advance now.
I was surprised that this little timing caused it to happen.
I want my fair share
|
|
|
Re: 383 problems.
[Re: ireland383]
#350839
06/18/09 06:12 PM
06/18/09 06:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647 IL
71383beep
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
|
That dizzy is WAY off. You need to get it curved correctly before changing anything else. Bad timing masks EVERYTHING.
16 to 19 inital 34 to 36 total all in by 2600 RPM
205 on the road is not hot either. I would be worried if it hits 220 and keeps going. what thermostat is in there? Stock was ussually 195 which is too hot for my tastes. I prefer the 180 or the 160 in some cases.
'73 GK6 Challenger Rallye - 340 4-Speed
|
|
|
Re: 383 problems.
[Re: stumpy]
#350841
06/18/09 10:32 PM
06/18/09 10:32 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 403 NE Ohio
71 FJ6 Charger
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 403
NE Ohio
|
Hold up,I thought,for arguements sake that a good guide line for street/performance was all in by 2800(no vacuum adv.),and that a stock set up was roughly 32-3600(with v.adv).
'71 383HP FJ6 Charger SE
|
|
|
Re: 383 problems.
[Re: stumpy]
#350845
06/19/09 12:12 AM
06/19/09 12:12 AM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 508 Cincinnati, Ohio
superbeedave
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 508
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
Guy's I appreciate all info. Let me fill everybody in on what's installed and exactly what I have done the past 3 weeks. You all know what cam is in it, Xtreme268.I went with the package that compcams recommends for this cam. matching valve springs and lifters. KB400 pistons, .03 over, stock 906 heads with 3 angle valve job. Mopar dual plane intake and electronic ignition. 2 weeks ago I was able to get my initial timing at 14 degrees at idle and 35 at approx. 2800 rpm's. I always thought that all advance should be in by 2800, isn't 3600 a little high? Well like I said when I took it out for a 60 mph 25 min. drive on the highway halfway down I turned around off exit and noticed how much faster it was idling and the temp had gone up from when I started out. When I got home and pulled it into the garage it was running around 1000, that is when I started out at about 925-950 idling with no vacuum advance hooked up then. Sorry guy's but I have done just about everything that you all recomended. Then I played a little more with dist. springs and I ended up at one time with all 35 in at idle and it was idling a lot better but I was told that it really should not all be in at idle so I reworked it again and with little springs I have it came in at 28 at idle and there is one spring that I end up with 10 degrees at idle and it was way too sluggish.I had a carter 625 that I changed rods, springs and jets and it never really worked. Now I have the AVS 650. My engine builder dialed in the cam and installed it straight up which compcams recommends due to all there cams are machined with 4 degrees advanced in them. Do you think I could just go ahead and drop in the dist. spring that would put me at 10-11 degrees advance at idle at unhook advance and go for the same drive to see if changes anything? I was always under the impreesion that for street driven cars that you must leave the advance hooked up just for good drivability and mileage. Does it also help keep engine cooler? I probable don't have but 100 miles on engine since it was rebuilt, could it still be really tight and causing alot of friction/heat because of that. Guy's, I am really in foreign terretory with! Has anyone ever had a phenolic 1/2" spacer that was out of flat up to about .005? I have one and I just took it off today and left it off.
Last edited by superbeedave; 06/19/09 12:15 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 problems.
[Re: 71 FJ6 Charger]
#350849
06/19/09 09:55 AM
06/19/09 09:55 AM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 508 Cincinnati, Ohio
superbeedave
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 508
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
Yes, I am pretty sure balancer marks are dead on. The guy that built the engine is a pretty smart guy when it comes to rebuilding engines. It is the same balancer and crank. It is aftermarket stock replacement timing cover and the tab is seperate so he was the one that reminded me that he had to bring up TDC before bolting down the tab and cover bolts. And as far as the zero deck goes. The stocks pistons that came out were at zero deck and they have a 1.927 compression height where these KB's are at 1.913 I do believe so that makes the flat part of the pistons down in the bore approx. .014 which isn't too bad. I still have not heard any pinging at all out of the engine I think it is due to the fact that I still have not allowed my mech. timing to go past 35 degrees. I do have the Crane adjustable rockers on that I think are too loose. Not 100 percent sure on adjusting these but I have gotten some good information off these forums to put me close. I had the stock rockers on but was informed to replace them due to the cam and springs I am using and they recommend not using the stock rockers. I know that would upset vacuum if they wen't adjusted properly but not that much!I replaced the intake valley pan gasket a couple of weeks ago just in case I had a vacuum leak their. I just can;t beleive that this cam could be causing all my problems. Should I have bought a carb. that was good up to .224/.230 duration? I can't help but to think maybe I should have gotten a Holley and or maybe stuck with the Edelbrock 750 I had for a few days and decided to take back. That was when I was still trying to get the timing right so it would idle and accelerate. The AVS650 I have I asked the Edelbrock tech guy over and over if the 650 which is only rated up to .220 at .05 cam duration and he said yes. I am going to take it out for another trip down highway then if it still is behaving the same way throw the vacuum gauge and timing light on it to see if anything has changed that would be causing it to idle faster that when I stared out. Thanks again guy's for particapating in my nighmare!!!
Last edited by superbeedave; 06/19/09 03:16 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 problems.
[Re: willard]
#350851
06/19/09 10:55 AM
06/19/09 10:55 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716 Baltimore/Denver
64Post
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
|
Quote:
I got 120-140 psi (not bad according to FSM) and no leaks, but the car is slower than it should be with stock 383.
If you only have 120-140 cranking pressure you have a problem.
|
|
|
|
|