MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
#3260927
09/30/24 01:59 PM
09/30/24 01:59 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489
Canada
|
Ive got a manual box, we installed the 20:1 MoPar Performance guts. Noticed the turning radius wasn't great so we thought the lower control arm "bumps" were limiting it from turning sharper. NOPE! The box stops the steering, it only turns 3 1/4 or so from lock to lock. Everywhere I read says it should be 4 1/2 turns lock to lock. Anybody else have this!!?!?
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#3260932
09/30/24 02:44 PM
09/30/24 02:44 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 299 Anchorage, Alaska
metallicareload
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 299
Anchorage, Alaska
|
“Stock” 24:1 ratio should be about 4 1/2 turns lock to lock.
20:1 ratio works out to AROUND 3 1/2 turns lock to lock, by my math. Is the range/angle of the actual pitman arm reduced?
440, 4-Speed, 3.54 1968, when Dinosaurs ruled the Earth
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: metallicareload]
#3260939
09/30/24 03:17 PM
09/30/24 03:17 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489
Canada
|
“Stock” 24:1 ratio should be about 4 1/2 turns lock to lock.
20:1 ratio works out to AROUND 3 1/2 turns lock to lock, by my math. Is the range/angle of the actual pitman arm reduced? Range SEEMS to be reduced. It also has a Firm Feel fast ratio pitman arm. Turning radius is pretty bad and bump stops are nowhere near the lower a arm, it's the box limiting the full turn abilities we think MoPar Performance P4007612 kit in a factory box housing. Steering is fine, but won't turn sharp!?!
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#3261027
09/30/24 06:54 PM
09/30/24 06:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598
So Cal
|
“Stock” 24:1 ratio should be about 4 1/2 turns lock to lock.
20:1 ratio works out to AROUND 3 1/2 turns lock to lock, by my math. Is the range/angle of the actual pitman arm reduced? Range SEEMS to be reduced. It also has a Firm Feel fast ratio pitman arm. Turning radius is pretty bad and bump stops are nowhere near the lower a arm, it's the box limiting the full turn abilities we think MoPar Performance P4007612 kit in a factory box housing. Steering is fine, but won't turn sharp!?! What was the intention of running a 20:1 box and fast ratio longer pitman arms. As apposed to 16:1 box. Did you change to a longer idler arm too to match the longer Pitman Arm? Need to accurately measure the output shaft lock to lock of your 20:1 box compared to a 24:1 box. Like paint mark a spine tooth, scratch awl a corresponding mark on the housing. The calipers involved. get measurement difference. Or maybe use an engine degree wheel. etc. If they are the same, I would look into the clocking of the pitman arm to the output shaft. I believe the repro Quick Ratio Pitman's are not clocked. So it's up to the user to figure out.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: autoxcuda]
#3262117
10/05/24 10:03 AM
10/05/24 10:03 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489
Canada
|
“Stock” 24:1 ratio should be about 4 1/2 turns lock to lock.
20:1 ratio works out to AROUND 3 1/2 turns lock to lock, by my math. Is the range/angle of the actual pitman arm reduced? Range SEEMS to be reduced. It also has a Firm Feel fast ratio pitman arm. Turning radius is pretty bad and bump stops are nowhere near the lower a arm, it's the box limiting the full turn abilities we think MoPar Performance P4007612 kit in a factory box housing. Steering is fine, but won't turn sharp!?! What was the intention of running a 20:1 box and fast ratio longer pitman arms. As apposed to 16:1 box. Did you change to a longer idler arm too to match the longer Pitman Arm? Need to accurately measure the output shaft lock to lock of your 20:1 box compared to a 24:1 box. Like paint mark a spine tooth, scratch awl a corresponding mark on the housing. The calipers involved. get measurement difference. Or maybe use an engine degree wheel. etc. If they are the same, I would look into the clocking of the pitman arm to the output shaft. I believe the repro Quick Ratio Pitman's are not clocked. So it's up to the user to figure out. I wanted a 16:1 ratio - the car is light, engine is setback, it's got narrow tires up front. Here's the weird part lol It's a C body front end. It has a Firm Feel fast ratio pitman arm, the idler arm is C body and almost identical length. We are measuring lock to lock this weekend as accurately as possible. The pitman arm is clocked dead center of the output shaft, it's restricted turning equally both ways.. Not sure if the 20:1 kit was faulty, our install was faulty or what. Drives fine just doesn't seem to turn far enough in either direction.
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#3262199
10/05/24 05:35 PM
10/05/24 05:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598
So Cal
|
“Stock” 24:1 ratio should be about 4 1/2 turns lock to lock.
20:1 ratio works out to AROUND 3 1/2 turns lock to lock, by my math. Is the range/angle of the actual pitman arm reduced? Range SEEMS to be reduced. It also has a Firm Feel fast ratio pitman arm. Turning radius is pretty bad and bump stops are nowhere near the lower a arm, it's the box limiting the full turn abilities we think MoPar Performance P4007612 kit in a factory box housing. Steering is fine, but won't turn sharp!?! What was the intention of running a 20:1 box and fast ratio longer pitman arms. As apposed to 16:1 box. Did you change to a longer idler arm too to match the longer Pitman Arm? Need to accurately measure the output shaft lock to lock of your 20:1 box compared to a 24:1 box. Like paint mark a spine tooth, scratch awl a corresponding mark on the housing. The calipers involved. get measurement difference. Or maybe use an engine degree wheel. etc. If they are the same, I would look into the clocking of the pitman arm to the output shaft. I believe the repro Quick Ratio Pitman's are not clocked. So it's up to the user to figure out. I wanted a 16:1 ratio - the car is light, engine is setback, it's got narrow tires up front. Here's the weird part lol It's a C body front end. It has a Firm Feel fast ratio pitman arm, the idler arm is C body and almost identical length. We are measuring lock to lock this weekend as accurately as possible. The pitman arm is clocked dead center of the output shaft, it's restricted turning equally both ways.. Not sure if the 20:1 kit was faulty, our install was faulty or what. Drives fine just doesn't seem to turn far enough in either direction. What do you mean it's a "C body front end" what car is all this installed on? If it's a B/E/A body the lower ball joints (than include steering arms) should be for the corresponding body style (typically K781/K783 if large bolt brakes)
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: autoxcuda]
#3262221
10/05/24 10:03 PM
10/05/24 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,699 Here
jcc
No soup for you!!!
|
No soup for you!!!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,699
Here
|
I wonder if he means the large C body tie rod ends and adjusters?
I'm with Helmuth Hübener, and no soup is being served today.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: autoxcuda]
#3263694
10/12/24 03:52 PM
10/12/24 03:52 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489
Canada
|
Oh it's a 1969/1970 C body front end, spindles, ball joints, frame, you name it. Has a manual box with a Firm Feel fast ratio pitman arm and Wilwoods but it's C body. (NOT A/B/E)
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#3263731
10/12/24 07:28 PM
10/12/24 07:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598
So Cal
|
Oh it's a 1969/1970 C body front end, spindles, ball joints, frame, you name it. Has a manual box with a Firm Feel fast ratio pitman arm and Wilwoods but it's C body. (NOT A/B/E) I think it should have a 69/70 C-body manual or power steering Pitman*. Depending on what original C-body manual vs power steering gear output shaft diameter size was. And what is the size of your 20:1 manual steering box output shaft? large or small spline? C-bodies have a pitman arm that is the same or close to same length as E-body fast ratio. But I don't think they are geometry wise the same. I'm sensing the fast ratio pitman and MP 20:1 gear is not jiving with the C-body suspension. Is your center link level/flat side to side? Also, what is the wheelbase of your Street Rod? How does that compare to a 69/70 C-body. Just double checking Ackerman. *C-body power steering pitman P/N is listed as K7072 in 1997 Moog catalog btw. The manual pitman is not listed.
Last edited by autoxcuda; 10/12/24 07:42 PM.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: Sniper]
#3263876
10/13/24 03:34 PM
10/13/24 03:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598
So Cal
|
There's an article an old article on Steering Gears in Mopar Action by Rich Ehrenberg that talks about C-body and Van Manual steering boxes.
I forget if one or both are different. There's a different looking housing.
So yes, like post above... something with steering stops. If the worm gear is same part number, the stop must be somewhere else (I don't know the guts of steering boxes enough to know where/how the stops happen).
What's odd, is that the power steering boxes interchange.
Last edited by autoxcuda; 10/13/24 03:39 PM.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: autoxcuda]
#3263961
10/14/24 03:10 AM
10/14/24 03:10 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,489
Canada
|
It's a B body manual steering box, small shaft. The Fast Ratio pitman arm was used not just for steering ratio but for the length, it's the same as the C body pitman arm. The center link is flat/parallel side to side. Not sure what you mean by different geometry in the pitman arms B to C body, but the shape of the pitman arm does not seem to be the problem. C body pitman arm won't help, it's a B body small spline box. Car has a 117" wheelbase, not sure that's relevant to the problem either. Turing stops do not come into contact, bump stops on lower control arms not a factor. Seems to us that the steering box doesn't turn as far BOTH WAYS as a regular B body manual steering box. Car drives perfect, just the turning circle not tight enough as we would like. We will figure it out, I'll post what it is/was.
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#3264076
10/14/24 02:07 PM
10/14/24 02:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598
So Cal
|
It's a B body manual steering box, small shaft. The Fast Ratio pitman arm was used not just for steering ratio but for the length, it's the same as the C body pitman arm. The center link is flat/parallel side to side. Not sure what you mean by different geometry in the pitman arms B to C body, but the shape of the pitman arm does not seem to be the problem. C body pitman arm won't help, it's a B body small spline box. A proof would be installing a 24:1 stock C-body manual steering box and stock pitman. Then see if turning radius was better. That's a lot of effort for a text though Good that centerlink is flat. I just wondered about the shape of the pitman. Car has a 117" wheelbase, not sure that's relevant to the problem either. That's close enough. If Ackerman was way off, when low speed turning one front wheel could be skidding effecting overall turning radius. But I think that would be small effect. Just checking since its a custom build. Like if your wheelbase was 40" different than a C-body that might be something to think about down the line. But not the case for you. Turing stops do not come into contact, bump stops on lower control arms not a factor. Seems to us that the steering box doesn't turn as far BOTH WAYS as a regular B body manual steering box. Car drives perfect, just the turning circle not tight enough as we would like. We will figure it out, I'll post what it is/was. Seems to be pointing towards a C-body vs A/B/E-body box difference. Here's what a large sector C-body (and B-van) manual steering box looks like for those unfamiliar
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: autoxcuda]
#3264219
10/15/24 07:29 AM
10/15/24 07:29 AM
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,616 nowhere
Sniper
master
|
master
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,616
nowhere
|
This thread reminds me of a customer I had back when I worked at a parts store.
Came in wanting plugs for his 76 Camaro with a 350. No problem, look them up, tell him his choices, he picks the brand he likes I get them,
We get to BS'ing about cars and he's telling me about the Camaro. Mentions it has "Corvette double hump" heads. Yeah, everybody back then had double hump heads, lol. Heck, I had a set on my 383 Hemi, lol.
Anyway, a dim light goes off in my head. Now I am not a Gm guy but I was pretty sure Chevy changed the plug style between the two so I tell him "Wait a minute" and look up the plugs by the application the heads came from. Sure enough, one was gasket type the other taper, so I get him the plugs he could actually use and not blame me for giving him the wrong ones.
Anyway, the reason this thread reminds of that is when you are playing mix and match with parts it is important you tell us that, not a generic "C body front end". Because, obviously it's not all C body steering and the issue is that you are using the wrong box. How to fix it? Use the C body box. Will your MP parts fit that box? I do not know.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: Sniper]
#3264238
10/15/24 09:38 AM
10/15/24 09:38 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,699 Here
jcc
No soup for you!!!
|
No soup for you!!!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,699
Here
|
I have nothing to add here except my amazement a C body ever had manual steering.
Last edited by jcc; 10/15/24 12:59 PM.
I'm with Helmuth Hübener, and no soup is being served today.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: jcc]
#3264249
10/15/24 10:44 AM
10/15/24 10:44 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,655 north of coder
moparx
"Butt Crack Bob"
|
"Butt Crack Bob"
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,655
north of coder
|
I having to add here except my amazement a C body ever had manual steering. back in my junkyard ownership days, [1972-1984/85] we got in a 1970 newport that had manual steering and power brakes. real plain car. wasn't too awful to steer when stopped, but had small tires on it. 7.75x15 if i recall correctly.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: jcc]
#3264349
10/15/24 06:27 PM
10/15/24 06:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598
So Cal
|
I have nothing to add here except my amazement a C body ever had manual steering. All of the famous 69 California Highway Patrol spec 440 HP Polara's were manual steering. Also note that parts list I posted shows that 71-93 B-series van's can have manual steering. And it's the same as the C-body box.
Last edited by autoxcuda; 10/15/24 06:34 PM.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: Sniper]
#3264358
10/15/24 07:10 PM
10/15/24 07:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598
So Cal
|
This thread reminds me of a customer I had back when I worked at a parts store.
Came in wanting plugs for his 76 Camaro with a 350. No problem, look them up, tell him his choices, he picks the brand he likes I get them,
We get to BS'ing about cars and he's telling me about the Camaro. Mentions it has "Corvette double hump" heads. Yeah, everybody back then had double hump heads, lol. Heck, I had a set on my 383 Hemi, lol.
Anyway, a dim light goes off in my head. Now I am not a Gm guy but I was pretty sure Chevy changed the plug style between the two so I tell him "Wait a minute" and look up the plugs by the application the heads came from. Sure enough, one was gasket type the other taper, so I get him the plugs he could actually use and not blame me for giving him the wrong ones.
Anyway, the reason this thread reminds of that is when you are playing mix and match with parts it is important you tell us that, not a generic "C body front end". Because, obviously it's not all C body steering and the issue is that you are using the wrong box. How to fix it? Use the C body box. Will your MP parts fit that box? I do not know. That can go both ways on these discussion boards. I've seen it where someone has a complicated situation and the replies can be over simplified like. " just put it back to stock" "just buy a whole aftermarket xxx..." without really digging into the root causes. I'm glad he brought this up. Cause I never knew that C-bodies have a wider output sweep. That might be valuable info if you put a C-body box in a A/B/E-body to get wider sweep or needing large diameter output sector. That is if the outside dimension of a C-body box can fit those other cars. With the avent of Electronic power assist and steering ratio quickner gears this might be valuable info to someone.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: autoxcuda]
#3264366
10/15/24 07:54 PM
10/15/24 07:54 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,699 Here
jcc
No soup for you!!!
|
No soup for you!!!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,699
Here
|
I have nothing to add here except my amazement a C body ever had manual steering. All of the famous 69 California Highway Patrol spec 440 HP Polara's were manual steering. Also note that parts list I posted shows that 71-93 B-series van's can have manual steering. And it's the same as the C-body box. Still amazed, but thanks. What ratio were those C Body's
I'm with Helmuth Hübener, and no soup is being served today.
|
|
|
Re: MoPar Performance 20:1 box lock to lock
[Re: jcc]
#3264407
10/16/24 12:23 AM
10/16/24 12:23 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,598
So Cal
|
I have nothing to add here except my amazement a C body ever had manual steering. All of the famous 69 California Highway Patrol spec 440 HP Polara's were manual steering. Also note that parts list I posted shows that 71-93 B-series van's can have manual steering. And it's the same as the C-body box. Still amazed, but thanks. What ratio were those C Body's 24 to 1 That’s why the original poster is trying to use that 20:1 box. And since all A/B/E-body manual boxes are small spline, he had to use the long repro T/A pitman. I think that was some smart thinking on that work around. But seems C-bodies had more sweep. But what I don’t get is if the C-body manuals need more sweep, shouldn’t the power steering boxes also need more sweep? Those P/S boxes interchange with A/B/E boxes I thought.
Last edited by autoxcuda; 10/16/24 12:24 AM.
|
|
|
|
|