Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: AndyF] #3200807
12/29/23 11:39 PM
12/29/23 11:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,512
God's Country Maryland
GODSCOUNTRY340 Offline
master
GODSCOUNTRY340  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,512
God's Country Maryland
Originally Posted by AndyF
Originally Posted by GODSCOUNTRY340
Originally Posted by AndyF
Engine like that doesn't need more than 600 cfm but a 750 vac secondary won't hurt anything. The 750 will probably never fully open since that engine will only use 500 to 500 cfm of air at WOT.



Really, 500 cfm? Wonder why the six pack worked so well on the 440, 1350 cfm. They also worked on the 340 engine.


Six pack doesn't flow 1350 cfm, that is a 2bbl rating number not a 4bbl rating number. Engine output of 400 hp requires 569 cfm with a BSFC of 0.500. If the engine is more efficient than 0.500 then it requires even less air to make 400 hp.



Okay, let's do the math on a six pack; center carb is a 350 cfm, the two end carbs flow 500 cfm each. I hope I don't need to add this up for you. Go on youtube and go to Nick's Garage and watch a 440 six pack on his Super Flow dyno. He has a camera looking down the carbs, now tell me they aren't completely open at WOT.

IMG_5102.jpeg
Last edited by GODSCOUNTRY340; 12/29/23 11:52 PM. Reason: pic

I love the smell of Deer guts in the morning, it smells like... VICTORY!
Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: GODSCOUNTRY340] #3200815
12/30/23 12:35 AM
12/30/23 12:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,042
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,042
Oregon
Those numbers are the two barrel ratings. It isn't the same as a 4 bbl rating. It was a marketing gimmick to fool people into thinking they had 1350 cfm when they actually had a lot less.

Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: Cab_Burge] #3200816
12/30/23 12:40 AM
12/30/23 12:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,042
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,042
Oregon
Originally Posted by Cab_Burge
Every B/RB motor, regardless of cubic inches, that I've added cfm on the intake side of the motors made more power at the drag strip and on the engine dyno up work
Swap 600 CFM carb to a 750, then an 850 and finally a intake and carb change to a 1050 CFM Dominator on a stock bore and stroke 440 bracket motor, jetted for best ET and MPH up
Same thing on more than one engine dyno tests, started testing with a 600 CFM carb and ended up with a tunnel ram intake with two 1060 CFM Dominators shock up boogie
Stupid Mopar wedge motors whistling grin


OP has a very mild 440 engine. It isn't going to pick up much power on the dyno with a bigger carb. It will only use about 550 cfm at WOT so a bigger carb isn't going to add much power. Might pick up 5 hp with a 750 carb. It would still drive okay with a 750 carb, especially if it has vac secondaries. I doubt it would pick up power with an 850 over a 750. Very likely that it would start to be a bit soft off throttle with a 850 Holley, depends a bit on the gear ratio out back. A Thermoquad or QJet could be made to work on that engine but the secondaries would most likely never open all the way.

Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: AndyF] #3200823
12/30/23 01:00 AM
12/30/23 01:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,946
WI
Dcuda69 Offline
master
Dcuda69  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,946
WI
LOL..these threads are always fun. I have a 69 B'cuda 4 spd 3:73 gear street toy. 1st motor was a thrown together 383 with a purple cam. Started with a hand me down 650 Holley DP...put gaskets in it and off we went. Ran excellent! A friend got me a deal on a 3310 750.....never touched it...bolted it on....ran excellent! Built a 470" w/solid roller. Left the 3310/750 on it....guess what....ran great! Got my hands on a 800 DP. Went through it ...gaskets etc. Bolted it on the 470...guess what....runs great!

Moral of the story? Many options out there for street toys! Will they be optimum options...likely not. Will they hit "the number" on an a/f sensor...likely not. Will the OP be able to start/run/drive/enjoy his toy?...most likely YES!!

PS..forgot...My vote is a 3310 Holley. Great all around street carb.

Last edited by Dcuda69; 12/30/23 01:07 AM.
Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: AndyF] #3200861
12/30/23 09:42 AM
12/30/23 09:42 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,512
God's Country Maryland
GODSCOUNTRY340 Offline
master
GODSCOUNTRY340  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,512
God's Country Maryland
Originally Posted by AndyF
Those numbers are the two barrel ratings. It isn't the same as a 4 bbl rating. It was a marketing gimmick to fool people into thinking they had 1350 cfm when they actually had a lot less.



Cubic Feet Per Minute (CFM) is the same whether it's a 2bbl or 4bbl, that's what the carb flows. It makes no difference if it's a 2bbl or 4bbl, the CFM is what that carb delivers. There's no difference in the 2bbl or 4bbl rating.


I love the smell of Deer guts in the morning, it smells like... VICTORY!
Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: AndyF] #3200862
12/30/23 09:43 AM
12/30/23 09:43 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,991
Apollo, PA.
B1MAXX Offline
top fuel
B1MAXX  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,991
Apollo, PA.
Originally Posted by AndyF
Those numbers are the two barrel ratings. It isn't the same as a 4 bbl rating. It was a marketing gimmick to fool people into thinking they had 1350 cfm when they actually had a lot less.


not buying your comment on hp related cfm requirements. The size of the engine/rpm has a lot to do with it.

Your better off looking at venturi area as a better comparison.

And even if I cant add, I can see there is more holes of similar size than a 750.

Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: Dcuda69] #3200867
12/30/23 10:26 AM
12/30/23 10:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,108
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,108
Benton, IL.
Originally Posted by Dcuda69
LOL..these threads are always fun.

Moral of the story? Many options out there for street toys! Will they be optimum options...likely not. Will they hit "the number" on an a/f sensor...likely not. Will the OP be able to start/run/drive/enjoy his toy?...most likely YES!!

PS..forgot...My vote is a 3310 Holley. Great all around street carb..


Obviously you have never ran an O2 sensor to see how rich those 3310s are at cruise which A)wastes gas B)washes down the cylinder walls C)leaves extra combustion chamber deposits D)dilutes and blackens the oil E)stinks up the place.

Our engines are much more tolerant of overly rich conditions than they are of lean ones. And overly lean conditions can damage our engines much faster and more dramatically than rich ones. That is why carbs that are overly rich are so often touted as a "Great all around street carb". Their very real down sides are not nearly as obvious.

The 3310 can be made into a pretty good street carb fairly easily and is worthy of consideration. But making it in into a truly "Great all around street carb" is another matter entirely.

Just because the carb doesn't exhibit any nasty driving habits by being too rich does not mean that it is not slowly doing real damage to the engine. A carb does not have to be perfect to be acceptable, but there are more things to consider other than it drives okay. A cheap narrow band will help out lot with these 'universal' carbs. Well under $100 will set one up. For a street car, the cruise is the place where the car spends a lot of time typically and is the area that should be addressed. A properly sized carb will be cruising on the main circuit which is nearly always easily adjustable. A narrow band can get you into an acceptable cruise ratio without too much hassle.


Master, again and still
Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: GODSCOUNTRY340] #3200878
12/30/23 11:44 AM
12/30/23 11:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,165
Plymouth, MI
Blusmbl Offline
master
Blusmbl  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,165
Plymouth, MI
Originally Posted by GODSCOUNTRY340
Cubic Feet Per Minute (CFM) is the same whether it's a 2bbl or 4bbl, that's what the carb flows. It makes no difference if it's a 2bbl or 4bbl, the CFM is what that carb delivers. There's no difference in the 2bbl or 4bbl rating.


The 2bbl carbs are measured at a different inlet depression than a 4bbl carb. They also have changed wet vs. dry flow over the years.

https://www.thecarburetorshop.com/Carbshop_carbsizesandCFM.htm


'18 Ford Raptor, random motorcycles, 1968 Plymouth Fury III - 11.37 @ 118
Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: B1MAXX] #3200904
12/30/23 01:02 PM
12/30/23 01:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,042
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,042
Oregon
Originally Posted by B1MAXX
Originally Posted by AndyF
Those numbers are the two barrel ratings. It isn't the same as a 4 bbl rating. It was a marketing gimmick to fool people into thinking they had 1350 cfm when they actually had a lot less.


not buying your comment on hp related cfm requirements. The size of the engine/rpm has a lot to do with it.

Your better off looking at venturi area as a better comparison.

And even if I cant add, I can see there is more holes of similar size than a 750.


Power comes from fuel so the amount of power produced is directly related to the amount of fuel consumed. 400 hp requires roughly 200 lbs of fuel per hour. The air fuel ratio in a street engine at WOT is around 13:1 so that gives you how many pounds of air you need. Once you know pounds of air you can convert to CFM. Engine size and RPM aren't required in the equation since the power comes from the fuel consumed.

Re: 440 suggested carb [Re: GODSCOUNTRY340] #3200905
12/30/23 01:03 PM
12/30/23 01:03 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,267
nowhere
S
Sniper Offline
master
Sniper  Offline
master
S

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,267
nowhere
Originally Posted by GODSCOUNTRY340
Originally Posted by AndyF
Those numbers are the two barrel ratings. It isn't the same as a 4 bbl rating. It was a marketing gimmick to fool people into thinking they had 1350 cfm when they actually had a lot less.



Cubic Feet Per Minute (CFM) is the same whether it's a 2bbl or 4bbl, that's what the carb flows. It makes no difference if it's a 2bbl or 4bbl, the CFM is what that carb delivers. There's no difference in the 2bbl or 4bbl rating.


Nope

https://www.speed-talk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32644

https://thecarburetorshop.com/Carbshop_carbsizesandCFM.htm

the 6bbl would be rated at about 810 cfm if flowed the same as the 4bbl. Better distribution is what made it shine.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1