Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far #3190402
11/12/23 11:24 AM
11/12/23 11:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline OP
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline OP
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
Anyone have a truck with the year 2020 introduced Ford 7.3L V8 ?

https://media.ford.com/content/dam/...ies-super-duty/7.3_Engine_Fact_Sheet.pdf

Have there been any magazine tests of trailer towing fuel economy against Stellantis and GM pickups?

Has Ford issued a considerable number of TSB’s ?

(Chuckle)
Do you have to remove the entire pickup cab to replace a blown fuse?

Ford has tweaked it some as a crate engine:

https://www.topspeed.com/heres-what-fords-v-8-engine-lineup-currently-looks-like/

sample quote

The most significant changes come under the skin, with H-beam connecting rods, forged pistons, and a forged crankshaft. The cylinder heads are CNC polished, while the low-profile intake manifold houses a 92-millimeter throttle body from the Mustang GT500. Ford says the design is compact enough to fit in cars and trucks, so we could see this engine make an appearance in several models down the line. For now, though, it will go on sale as a crate engine, which should be available starting in the spring of 2023. Pricing is as yet unknown, but the base Godzilla crate engine costs $9,175, so expect Megazilla to cost considerably more, perhaps in the $15,000 region.
end quote

I am curious whether modern diesels ULSD price, DEF cost, and particulate matter filter re-gen headaches
make gasoline trailer towing less per mile

Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 360view] #3190434
11/12/23 12:56 PM
11/12/23 12:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 1,180
Nor here, Nor there
D
Dart 500 Offline
super stock
Dart 500  Offline
super stock
D

Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 1,180
Nor here, Nor there
They have reduced its power rating in the cab/chassis applications to almost pointless levels for it being such a large engine.

Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: Dart 500] #3190450
11/12/23 02:36 PM
11/12/23 02:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline OP
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline OP
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
You are right.

2019 original rating

430 HP / 475 Torque

2022 Rating

335 HP / 438 Torque from 455 cubic inches in an engine with Variable Valve Timing.

Ford must have limited the higher RPM power with the engine controller and VVT to keep something from breaking or overheating?

F.O.R.D - fix /or /rerate /downward

https://www.ford.com/commercial-trucks/chassis-cab/features/power/

Pickups still rated higher

https://media.ford.com/content/dam/...y/2023%20Super%20Duty%20Tech%20Specs.pdf

Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 360view] #3190464
11/12/23 03:44 PM
11/12/23 03:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 1,180
Nor here, Nor there
D
Dart 500 Offline
super stock
Dart 500  Offline
super stock
D

Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 1,180
Nor here, Nor there
The F250 trucks are still 400+ from what I can tell but it was the motor homes I was watching. It was already low at 350hp and 468lbft but they dropped it AGAIN to 325hp and 450lbft. Thats 1978 440 levels all considering

Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: Dart 500] #3190552
11/12/23 11:40 PM
11/12/23 11:40 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 371
Kings Beach, CA
T
tahoechallenge Offline
enthusiast
tahoechallenge  Offline
enthusiast
T

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 371
Kings Beach, CA
My company has a bunch of 550's with the V8. They seem to be a lot more reliable then the diesels they replaced. They seem to have good enough power. Terrible fuel economy though. 7-8 mpg. The guys have to fuel them every day. They have a GVR around 16k For comparison I drive a M2 Freightliner with a 6.7 Cummins and it gets around 10mpg. 26k GVR.

Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: tahoechallenge] #3190583
11/13/23 10:20 AM
11/13/23 10:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,053
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,053
Benton, IL.
This summer the local electric co-op was trimming/clearing their line along our western property line. I was talking to their forestry/procurement manager while we were looking at their chopper. It was BIG, could handle up to 18" stuff.

He said that they were all gas now after decades of diesel models. The gas simply do a better job now, are less expensive to buy, and have less maintenance and repair costs. Took them all by surprise, but they have had the gas ones for several years now and are not going back to the diesels. Surprised me too.


Master, again and still
Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: DaveRS23] #3190591
11/13/23 11:02 AM
11/13/23 11:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,531
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart Offline
Rhinotruck
Rhinodart  Offline
Rhinotruck

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,531
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
I know that last couple of years when the price of diesel was crazy I did the math and my 5.7 Hemi Ram was cheaper to trailer with than my 6.7 Cummins diesel. It all depended on the wind direction, weight I was towing, and distance...


The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.

JB Rhinehart, Realist

A-Body's RULE!
Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: Rhinodart] #3190596
11/13/23 12:04 PM
11/13/23 12:04 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,769
Holland MI Ottawa
2
2boltmain Offline
master
2boltmain  Offline
master
2

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,769
Holland MI Ottawa
From what I read, even IF diesel fuel was the same price as gasoline or cheaper- the modern diesel engine is so expensive, complex- repair and maint heavy ( unreliable) that many see- despite the bad fuel mileage of gasoline- running gas engine trucks is cheaper and less liability than keeping the modern diesel engine running.


Keep old mopars alive.
Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 360view] #3190602
11/13/23 12:38 PM
11/13/23 12:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
we have a 2021 class c motorhome witht he 7.3. tows our jeep like it isn't there. MPG isn't so great but it does run nice moving this huge vehicle.


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: tahoechallenge] #3190603
11/13/23 12:48 PM
11/13/23 12:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,509
Tulsa, Oklahoma
340Cuda Offline
master
340Cuda  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,509
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Originally Posted by tahoechallenge
My company has a bunch of 550's with the V8. They seem to be a lot more reliable then the diesels they replaced. They seem to have good enough power. Terrible fuel economy though. 7-8 mpg. The guys have to fuel them every day. They have a GVR around 16k For comparison I drive a M2 Freightliner with a 6.7 Cummins and it gets around 10mpg. 26k GVR.
Have you had any emissions issues with the Cummins?

Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 340Cuda] #3190732
11/13/23 11:15 PM
11/13/23 11:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 371
Kings Beach, CA
T
tahoechallenge Offline
enthusiast
tahoechallenge  Offline
enthusiast
T

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 371
Kings Beach, CA
"Have you had any emissions issues with the Cummins?"
Not really. The only problem I have had with it is a clogged egr tube. It threw a code and slightly de-rated. My truck is a 2010, (I got it new fall 2009) so no def, just regen. I run the truck very hard going back and forth over Donner Summit. It gets good and hot for mile after mile. About the only time it regens is when I run the pto for long amounts of time.

Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: tahoechallenge] #3190751
11/14/23 06:52 AM
11/14/23 06:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline OP
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline OP
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
I still believe that EGR tubing runs should be entirely straight Cunifer brake tubing with elbows held on with quick release fittings.
Quick “rodding out” maintenance would be worth the slightly higher initial cost.

How many national park lands or nation sea preserves
could have already been bought with the cost of all this DEF fluid, shop repair visits, 18 wheeler tow in costs, etc ?

In the mean time farmers can over apply nitrogen fertilizer which quickly releases NOx into both air and runoff water.

EV fires are in the news, with warnings like:
Li battery fires are super hot, generate their own oxygen, and the vast fumes are mixes of super-toxic gases.

Do EV fires emit NOx ?

How much?


Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 360view] #3190802
11/14/23 12:06 PM
11/14/23 12:06 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,769
Holland MI Ottawa
2
2boltmain Offline
master
2boltmain  Offline
master
2

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,769
Holland MI Ottawa
The 7.3 "Godzilla" gas V8 from Ford was supposed to be the next big/great thing. Forged knife edged crankshaft, deep skirt block bullet proof from top to bottom, strong rods- pistons and heads that flowed a ton of air with a fantastic combustion chamber. The engine builders- even those not into Fords were all raving about this engine 4 years ago. The cam in block design guaranteed none of that DOHC complexity and nonsense. It's a shame this design has had to have a power reduction.


Keep old mopars alive.
Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 2boltmain] #3190846
11/14/23 02:21 PM
11/14/23 02:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,022
Tulsa OK
Bad340fish Offline
master
Bad340fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,022
Tulsa OK
Originally Posted by 2boltmain
The 7.3 "Godzilla" gas V8 from Ford was supposed to be the next big/great thing. Forged knife edged crankshaft, deep skirt block bullet proof from top to bottom, strong rods- pistons and heads that flowed a ton of air with a fantastic combustion chamber. The engine builders- even those not into Fords were all raving about this engine 4 years ago. The cam in block design guaranteed none of that DOHC complexity and nonsense. It's a shame this design has had to have a power reduction.


They always reduce the power in the fleet vehicles rated over 1 ton. F350 has 400 something horsepower and an F750 with the same engine will have 275 or around there or maybe less. I am sure the reasoning it longevity at 100% load.


68 Barracuda Formula S 340
Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: Bad340fish] #3190858
11/14/23 03:03 PM
11/14/23 03:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,164
Plymouth, MI
Blusmbl Offline
master
Blusmbl  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,164
Plymouth, MI
Some of it is emissions now- CARB used to have NTE emissions regulations for dyno certified stuff, but they moved to a moving average window calculation for the 2024 model year, and it applies to both gas and diesel. All of the big incomplete vehicles fall under that requirement.


'18 Ford Raptor, random motorcycles, 1968 Plymouth Fury III - 11.37 @ 118
Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 360view] #3190899
11/14/23 05:45 PM
11/14/23 05:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by 360view
You are right.

2019 original rating

430 HP / 475 Torque

2022 Rating

335 HP / 438 Torque from 455 cubic inches in an engine with Variable Valve Timing.

Ford must have limited the higher RPM power with the engine controller and VVT to keep something from breaking or overheating?

F.O.R.D - fix /or /rerate /downward

https://www.ford.com/commercial-trucks/chassis-cab/features/power/

Pickups still rated higher

https://media.ford.com/content/dam/...y/2023%20Super%20Duty%20Tech%20Specs.pdf



Dodge did the same thing with the 6.4 hemi


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: tahoechallenge] #3190900
11/14/23 05:48 PM
11/14/23 05:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by tahoechallenge
"Have you had any emissions issues with the Cummins?"
Not really. The only problem I have had with it is a clogged egr tube. It threw a code and slightly de-rated. My truck is a 2010, (I got it new fall 2009) so no def, just regen. I run the truck very hard going back and forth over Donner Summit. It gets good and hot for mile after mile. About the only time it regens is when I run the pto for long amounts of time.




Do you ever stop there for "lunch"?


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 2boltmain] #3190902
11/14/23 05:54 PM
11/14/23 05:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by 2boltmain
From what I read, even IF diesel fuel was the same price as gasoline or cheaper- the modern diesel engine is so expensive, complex- repair and maint heavy ( unreliable) that many see- despite the bad fuel mileage of gasoline- running gas engine trucks is cheaper and less liability than keeping the modern diesel engine running.



I can put another entire 6.4 hemi in my 3/4 ton for just the price of injectors in a modern diesel and we do turbos and other ginormous repair bills on diesels all the time also. With my simple formula for a 6.4 build they tow awesome and get great MPG for a big gas engine. They get heat working faster in the winter, start easier, less fuel filters, much cheaper oil changes, less fumes, less weight makes ball joints and other stuff last longer... I can't even come close to justifying the much greater expense of a diesel. I got no EGR to clog up or delete and no DEF to fart around with.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: 360view] #3190903
11/14/23 05:57 PM
11/14/23 05:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by 360view
Anyone have a truck with the year 2020 introduced Ford 7.3L V8 ?

https://media.ford.com/content/dam/...ies-super-duty/7.3_Engine_Fact_Sheet.pdf

Have there been any magazine tests of trailer towing fuel economy against Stellantis and GM pickups?

Has Ford issued a considerable number of TSB’s ?

(Chuckle)
Do you have to remove the entire pickup cab to replace a blown fuse?

Ford has tweaked it some as a crate engine:

https://www.topspeed.com/heres-what-fords-v-8-engine-lineup-currently-looks-like/

sample quote

The most significant changes come under the skin, with H-beam connecting rods, forged pistons, and a forged crankshaft. The cylinder heads are CNC polished, while the low-profile intake manifold houses a 92-millimeter throttle body from the Mustang GT500. Ford says the design is compact enough to fit in cars and trucks, so we could see this engine make an appearance in several models down the line. For now, though, it will go on sale as a crate engine, which should be available starting in the spring of 2023. Pricing is as yet unknown, but the base Godzilla crate engine costs $9,175, so expect Megazilla to cost considerably more, perhaps in the $15,000 region.
end quote

I am curious whether modern diesels ULSD price, DEF cost, and particulate matter filter re-gen headaches
make gasoline trailer towing less per mile



I don't have any useful experience with the 7.3 yet but I find it odd that ford finally realized emissions and MPG could be done with this combo but suddenly dodge can't? The hemi has better low lift flow but basically everything ferd did with this engine is exactly what dodge has been doing with the hemi.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Ford 7.3 V8 experience so far [Re: HotRodDave] #3191019
11/15/23 07:10 AM
11/15/23 07:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline OP
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline OP
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
Based on how the factory 1994-1995 catalytic converter core ceramic broke up,
I wonder if these commercial application engines are being derated
to keep the catalytic converters from overheating
on long hill climbs with heavy loads.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1