Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: jahsh] #31885
11/02/06 03:56 AM
11/02/06 03:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,820
near Alexandria, VA
G
Gas_Bandit Offline
master
Gas_Bandit  Offline
master
G

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,820
near Alexandria, VA
I have a later style 67+ A body manifold on the driver's side of a 66 A body with no modifications to the steering shaft (manual steering). I had to grind on the collector flange of the manifold to clear the steering, quite a bit, but it fits with no interference. What I ground away was just extra casting material. I am using a magnum truck manifold on the pass. side. I have magnum heads anyway on an LA, but the magnum manifold will fit LA heads as well.


2003 Mercury Marauder, 34k miles, 3.73s and custom flash tuned
1981 Camaro, 350 w/ Holley Stealth Ram MPEFI, Sportsman heads, roller cam, self-burned chips, wideband O2
1983 Firebird TA
1993 Saturn SL2 83k
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: furious] #31886
11/02/06 12:24 PM
11/02/06 12:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 755
Oregon
M
moparmedic Offline
super stock
moparmedic  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 755
Oregon
I am not sure about the best exhaust, but the easiest and least expensive for a daily driver is to use the stock 273 manifolds. Check this artical out regarding flow, someone sent it to me when I was asking a similar question. http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/155_0307_mopar_crate_engine_exhaust/
We put a 360 in our 65 barracuda and used the stock manifolds. We stepped the outlets up to 2" then to 2 1/4" pipe and snaked the passenger side around the trans pan so both pipes come together (side by side)at the tranny cross member on the driver's side. It is really clean see attached.
If I would have considered it earlier in the build, I would have modified the crossmember but I am happy with the way we did it.
In order to get larger pipes in I went ahead and converted the kickdown to lokar. That really simplified the system and gave me more room.

3035569-DSCF0077.JPG (279 downloads)

1968 Coronet
1968 Charger
1966 A100 Pickup
1967 Barracuda
1970 Challenger
1972 Challenger
1973 Barracuda
2021 Ram 2500
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: Joesixpack] #31887
11/02/06 09:12 PM
11/02/06 09:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
F
furious Offline OP
top fuel
furious  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
Quote:

these are my pro modified 340-360 1964-66 A-body engine mounting brackets, makes it a factory drop in swap.




So the mounting tabs are different on a 273 block than the 340 block? I had not even considered that problem.

Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: moparmedic] #31888
11/02/06 09:17 PM
11/02/06 09:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
F
furious Offline OP
top fuel
furious  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
Quote:

I am not sure about the best exhaust, but the easiest and least expensive for a daily driver is to use the stock 273 manifolds. Check this artical out regarding flow, someone sent it to me when I was asking a similar question. http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/155_0307_mopar_crate_engine_exhaust/
We put a 360 in our 65 barracuda and used the stock manifolds. We stepped the outlets up to 2" then to 2 1/4" pipe and snaked the passenger side around the trans pan so both pipes come together (side by side)at the tranny cross member on the driver's side. It is really clean see attached.
If I would have considered it earlier in the build, I would have modified the crossmember but I am happy with the way we did it.
In order to get larger pipes in I went ahead and converted the kickdown to lokar. That really simplified the system and gave me more room.




Very informative, I am not going to worry about 11 hp at over 4 grand on this project. It may be worthwhile just to use the 273 manifolds and do a similar exhaust set up to yours. The lokar was already in the plans. Thanks very much!

Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: furious] #31889
11/02/06 09:28 PM
11/02/06 09:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
the 273 manifolds will probably choke a 340.. they are really small..


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: abodyjoe] #31890
11/02/06 09:32 PM
11/02/06 09:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
F
furious Offline OP
top fuel
furious  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
Quote:

the 273 manifolds will probably choke a 340.. they are really small..




You are certainly correct about the smallness, and that is the reason I started this thread. But if I read the article linked correctly, it is only a little over 10 hp loss. Maybe I am misreading the manifolds they used?

69 A body 318 manifolds, is there much difference between them and the 273 manifolds?

Last edited by furious; 11/02/06 09:38 PM.
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: furious] #31891
11/03/06 01:07 AM
11/03/06 01:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 755
Oregon
M
moparmedic Offline
super stock
moparmedic  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 755
Oregon
After I read that article I measured a set of 318 A Body manifolds and the outlets on the ones I have are the same. That was what made my mind up.
The 273 manifolds will not "choke" your 340. Refer to the artical, I believe that the mule engine for those tests was a 300 HP 360.
My 360 does just fine. It would be nice to run headers and 2 1/2 pipes but on our car it is not worth the price or headache to me.
There is very little room to work with on the early A Bodies anyway.


1968 Coronet
1968 Charger
1966 A100 Pickup
1967 Barracuda
1970 Challenger
1972 Challenger
1973 Barracuda
2021 Ram 2500
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: moparmedic] #31892
11/03/06 08:38 AM
11/03/06 08:38 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
well i can tell you one thing... i had 340 manifolds and they choked my 360 in there, compared to spitfires, and people say they dont flow...

trust me with that stupid 90º turn, and small ports on the 273 manifolds your loosing lot more then 10 hp.

i dont have to dyno a motor to tell you that....

Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: moparmedic] #31893
11/03/06 08:53 AM
11/03/06 08:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
you guys running the 273 manifolds on a 360 or 340 do what you want... bit it definatley is gonna choke it,,, yea the car may be fast enough for you but it sure isn't gonna be anywhere near what it could... look at that 273 manifold... its small and makes a hard turn.. that thing is restrictive... i have had a 360 in a 64 valiant with those crappy manifolds so i am not just talking out my rear here...

and heck you wouldn't believe the difference in djv's car going from a 340 manifold (wich is way bigger and didn't have that bend like the 273 manifold) to the spitfires was incredible.. night and day...



on a side note.. you may have to grind a little on the head i think it was for the manifold to sit flat on a 340/360. it was years ago so i don't exactly remember what it was hitting....


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: moparmedic] #31894
11/03/06 08:56 AM
11/03/06 08:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
Quote:

There is very little room to work with on the early A Bodies anyway.






come on.. it ain't that bad.. i guess next you'll say a 440 won't fit in one either...





It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: abodyjoe] #31895
11/03/06 08:57 AM
11/03/06 08:57 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
dont believe everything you read....

Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: DJVCuda] #31896
11/03/06 09:00 AM
11/03/06 09:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
Quote:

dont believe everything you read....





heck if i believed everything i read i would have never put a 440 in my 64 valiant... i saw in a couple magazines back then that said it wouldn't fit.. and you know how many oldheads said it would never fit... if you ask me it was easier to work on with the 440 then when it had the 360 in it....


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: abodyjoe] #31897
11/03/06 10:42 AM
11/03/06 10:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
take 2 tranny crossmembers & cut & weld them together so your exhaust pipe will tuck up nicely on each side. RR


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: abodyjoe] #31898
11/03/06 10:43 AM
11/03/06 10:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 755
Oregon
M
moparmedic Offline
super stock
moparmedic  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 755
Oregon
If you look back at my first post, I said "I don't know about the best" and went on to say what I did and why. Are there better systems? of course there are. Could you build more horse power with headers and bigger pipe? yes.
I stand corrected in that there is a lot of room if you cut the fender wells.
The bottom line is that the 273 manifolds are an option and it is all personal preference and what an individual wants out of a car. I am talking ease of install, cheap, and clean. Once again, our 360 runs out just fine for a street car.
Believe what you read or not it is up to you.

3037744-DSCF0074.JPG (129 downloads)

1968 Coronet
1968 Charger
1966 A100 Pickup
1967 Barracuda
1970 Challenger
1972 Challenger
1973 Barracuda
2021 Ram 2500
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: moparmedic] #31899
11/03/06 12:51 PM
11/03/06 12:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
you don't need to get wound up... if you read my post i said do what you want.....

but not the best is an understatement... atleast go with a 340 manifold.. but then again now your getting to spitfire prices...


i would consider spitfires maybe not the best but work pretty well and fit prett good...


the 273 manifolds are useless on anything over a 318....


have you compared the 273 gasket to the port on the 340/360 heads?? its crazy how small it is compared to the port...

like i said.. do what you want... i just can't see going through the trouble of building a 340 and sticking it in and letting it exhaust through those tiny things.. especially when ther is a relativley cheap solution....


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: furious] #31900
11/03/06 06:22 PM
11/03/06 06:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
Quote:

Quote:

the 273 manifolds will probably choke a 340.. they are really small..




You are certainly correct about the smallness, and that is the reason I started this thread. But if I read the article linked correctly, it is only a little over 10 hp loss. Maybe I am misreading the manifolds they used?

69 A body 318 manifolds, is there much difference between them and the 273 manifolds?






yes that is what that article says... but look at those 318 manifolds.. they don't have that choking bend like the 273 manifolds for an early a-body...


you can read this article http://www.compcams.com/Community/Articles/Details.asp?ID=-738676943 and it says the headders added 15hp over the best flowing 340 manifolds made. (the early ones..) now look at those early 340 manifolds and then look at the 273 early a-body manifold and tell me there isn't night and day between them....


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: RapidRobert] #31901
11/03/06 06:47 PM
11/03/06 06:47 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
F
furious Offline OP
top fuel
furious  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
Quote:

take 2 tranny crossmembers & cut & weld them together so your exhaust pipe will tuck up nicely on each side. RR




That is good idea, the crossmember that has the torsion bars attached to it seems like it would be the biggest problem. That is why I like how moparmedic ran his over together on the drivers side. Pretty slick!

Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: abodyjoe] #31902
11/03/06 06:51 PM
11/03/06 06:51 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
F
furious Offline OP
top fuel
furious  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,615
Table Rock Lake Missouri
Quote:

Quote:

There is very little room to work with on the early A Bodies anyway.






come on.. it ain't that bad.. i guess next you'll say a 440 won't fit in one either...


Are those fenderwells home made? They don't look like the 5215 Hookers I used to run on my race car.




Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: furious] #31903
11/03/06 07:28 PM
11/03/06 07:28 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,515
Turku, Finland
Forwardlook Offline
master
Forwardlook  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,515
Turku, Finland
Looks like the TTI:s wouldn't work with power steering? The Doug's seem to fit with power steering too...anyone have any experience with that? The TTI website didn't have the early A-body parts listed yet.

Here's a budget solution that hasn't been mentioned, Durango/Dakota manifolds;

http://www.geocities.com/lars_an_artist/durango.html

Hans

Re: 340 in 65 Barracuda, few questions please. [Re: Forwardlook] #31904
11/03/06 08:00 PM
11/03/06 08:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,081
Berlin, N.J.
Quote:

Looks like the TTI:s wouldn't work with power steering? The Doug's seem to fit with power steering too...anyone have any experience with that? The TTI website didn't have the early A-body parts listed yet.

Here's a budget solution that hasn't been mentioned, Durango/Dakota manifolds;

http://www.geocities.com/lars_an_artist/durango.html

Hans






from what i hear you need a special $200 starter to run the tti's.


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1