Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
How "big" is a TF270 intake port? #3083547
10/05/22 12:44 PM
10/05/22 12:44 PM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline OP
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
It may have an Max Wedge entry, but without offset intake rockers it's gotta be fairly limited in MCSA, especially at the pushrod pinch. Anybody taken or seen any MCSA / Average CSA measurements for the TF270?


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Brad_Haak] #3083553
10/05/22 12:59 PM
10/05/22 12:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas
270 CC's boogie


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Al_Alguire] #3083556
10/05/22 01:09 PM
10/05/22 01:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline OP
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
^^^^

"Hello... Newman" whistling

tonguue


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Brad_Haak] #3083565
10/05/22 01:45 PM
10/05/22 01:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Al_Alguire] #3083607
10/05/22 05:08 PM
10/05/22 05:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 926
B
birdtracker Offline
super stock
birdtracker  Offline
super stock
B

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 926
Al: thats 2 very interesting articles. Guess I am on the naughty list as Santa didn't bring mine!!!! Birdtracker

Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Brad_Haak] #3083643
10/05/22 07:17 PM
10/05/22 07:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,995
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,995
Oregon
There isn't much of a pushrod pinch in the 270 head even though it uses a standard offset rocker. Some sort of magic compared to other heads. They just moved stuff around enough to provide some extra space.

Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Brad_Haak] #3083684
10/05/22 10:13 PM
10/05/22 10:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,395
Pa
Hot 340 Offline
master
Hot 340  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,395
Pa
I saw a pair on display at summit in Ohio. They were pee wee stuff compared to the other brands offerings. They looked like 200 cc heads🤣

Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Hot 340] #3083692
10/05/22 10:56 PM
10/05/22 10:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,995
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,995
Oregon
Originally Posted by Hot 340
I saw a pair on display at summit in Ohio. They were pee wee stuff compared to the other brands offerings. They looked like 200 cc heads🤣


Yes, Mopar BB heads are very small compared to something like a BB Chevy head. That is why it is easier to make power with a big BBC than a big Mopar BB. The TF270 heads provide the average backyard builder with a good 700 head. A pro engine builder can get 800 hp out a set of TF270 heads but it gets hard to make more than that NA.

If you want to run a BBC then you can buy a 1000 hp pump gas street engine. The BBC has become a much better engine for making power over the last 30 years because GM has continued to upgrade the design. Mopar never upgraded the big block design so we're still stuck with two piece rear main seal and other outdated features. I have a customer with a Mark VI big block and it has substantial upgrades when compared to the muscle car era design.

Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: AndyF] #3083726
10/06/22 08:00 AM
10/06/22 08:00 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560
Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick Offline
Still wishing...
Twostick  Offline
Still wishing...

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560
Downtown Roebuck Ont
Originally Posted by AndyF
Originally Posted by Hot 340
I saw a pair on display at summit in Ohio. They were pee wee stuff compared to the other brands offerings. They looked like 200 cc heads🤣


Yes, Mopar BB heads are very small compared to something like a BB Chevy head. That is why it is easier to make power with a big BBC than a big Mopar BB. The TF270 heads provide the average backyard builder with a good 700 head. A pro engine builder can get 800 hp out a set of TF270 heads but it gets hard to make more than that NA.

If you want to run a BBC then you can buy a 1000 hp pump gas street engine. The BBC has become a much better engine for making power over the last 30 years because GM has continued to upgrade the design. Mopar never upgraded the big block design so we're still stuck with two piece rear main seal and other outdated features. I have a customer with a Mark VI big block and it has substantial upgrades when compared to the muscle car era design.


Has ANYBODY updated the combustion chamber from 1958 yet? That seems like it should be a zero $$$ cost upgrade because you have to make a pattern for the mold anyway. Make it a shape that works better. Lots to copy from.

Kevin

Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Twostick] #3083739
10/06/22 09:07 AM
10/06/22 09:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,042
Shelby Twp. Mi
HardcoreB Offline
master
HardcoreB  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,042
Shelby Twp. Mi
Should be REALLY simple...whomever has a 270 head just measure the pushrod pinch area and report back please. For reference, the SR's I did about 1.21 is near max in width without repair work.

Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: AndyF] #3083745
10/06/22 09:27 AM
10/06/22 09:27 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
GTX MATT Offline
master
GTX MATT  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
Originally Posted by AndyF
Originally Posted by Hot 340
I saw a pair on display at summit in Ohio. They were pee wee stuff compared to the other brands offerings. They looked like 200 cc heads🤣


Yes, Mopar BB heads are very small compared to something like a BB Chevy head. That is why it is easier to make power with a big BBC than a big Mopar BB. The TF270 heads provide the average backyard builder with a good 700 head. A pro engine builder can get 800 hp out a set of TF270 heads but it gets hard to make more than that NA.

If you want to run a BBC then you can buy a 1000 hp pump gas street engine. The BBC has become a much better engine for making power over the last 30 years because GM has continued to upgrade the design. Mopar never upgraded the big block design so we're still stuck with two piece rear main seal and other outdated features. I have a customer with a Mark VI big block and it has substantial upgrades when compared to the muscle car era design.


And Mopar guys will put a standard port window on a 500+ cubic inch engine for fear of losing torque. A std port B/RB is comparable in size to a “peanut port” BBC head.


Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat
Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: birdtracker] #3083753
10/06/22 09:52 AM
10/06/22 09:52 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline OP
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Originally Posted by birdtracker
... Guess I am on the naughty list as Santa didn't bring mine!!!! Birdtracker

Santa left me a note a few years ago:
"Dear Brad,

You've been an a-hole this year; no Trick Flows for you!

Instead, I'm leaving a set of bare Victor castings that need everything done to be ready to go. Have fun!

Santa (Yeah, I can be an a-hole, too) Claus"


laugh2


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: HardcoreB] #3083755
10/06/22 09:58 AM
10/06/22 09:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline OP
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Originally Posted by HardcoreB
Should be REALLY simple...whomever has a 270 head just measure the pushrod pinch area and report back please. For reference, the SR's I did about 1.21 is near max in width without repair work.

width x height

The pics I was checking out -- as Andy mentioned -- don't show a lot of pinch. Looks like TF did a good job of maximizing the available real estate for a standard-offset intake rocker.


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Brad_Haak] #3083786
10/06/22 12:05 PM
10/06/22 12:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas
Ehhhh if omeone does try to make BETTER parts, like cylinder heads most the Mopar purists will just throw it under the bus and complain that its not a BBM looks like brand X stuff to me....Ask me how I know rolleyes


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Al_Alguire] #3083796
10/06/22 12:24 PM
10/06/22 12:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline OP
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Originally Posted by Al_Alguire
Ehhhh if omeone does try to make BETTER parts, like cylinder heads most the Mopar purists will just throw it under the bus and complain that its not a BBM looks like brand X stuff to me....Ask me how I know rolleyes

For people trying to build serious & competitive Mopar-based engines, it's got to be waaaay frustrating at the lack of options or availability.


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Brad_Haak] #3083808
10/06/22 12:54 PM
10/06/22 12:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,995
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,995
Oregon
Originally Posted by Brad_Haak
Originally Posted by Al_Alguire
Ehhhh if omeone does try to make BETTER parts, like cylinder heads most the Mopar purists will just throw it under the bus and complain that its not a BBM looks like brand X stuff to me....Ask me how I know rolleyes

For people trying to build serious & competitive Mopar-based engines, it's got to be waaaay frustrating at the lack of options or availability.


A 572 built with an Indy block and 572-13 heads is a pretty stout combo for bracket racing. It costs a lot more than a 1000 hp 632 inch BBC crate motor, but it will make good power and it looks like a Mopar

It is that is now easier than ever to build a 700 or 800 hp BB Mopar that uses "classic" Mopar parts and looks like a Mopar. If a guy is happy with a 9 or even 8 second door slammer than everything is cool. I don't worry about this too much. Buick, Olds and Pontiac guys have had this issue for years. Ford guys have some nice options and Chevy BB guys have tons of options. Mopar guys are better off than the BOP guys but don't have the factory support of either the Ford or Chevy guys. Just the way it is due to decisions made by Mopar Performance years ago. They could've solved the block problem 20 years ago but they didn't. They could've solved the head problem 20 years ago but they didn't. Nothing we can do about their failure to make good decisions years ago.

Trick Flow did a big favor for the 600 to 800 hp crowd, and Indy still has good options for the 700 to 900 hp crowd so 90% of the bracket racers are covered. It is just the die hard Mopar guys who want to make more than 1000 hp who have it tough.

Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: AndyF] #3083815
10/06/22 01:01 PM
10/06/22 01:01 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,489
northern,Ohio,USA
C
Clanton Offline
master
Clanton  Offline
master
C

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,489
northern,Ohio,USA
Originally Posted by AndyF
Originally Posted by Brad_Haak
Originally Posted by Al_Alguire
Ehhhh if omeone does try to make BETTER parts, like cylinder heads most the Mopar purists will just throw it under the bus and complain that its not a BBM looks like brand X stuff to me....Ask me how I know rolleyes

For people trying to build serious & competitive Mopar-based engines, it's got to be waaaay frustrating at the lack of options or availability.


A 572 built with an Indy block and 572-13 heads is a pretty stout combo for bracket racing. It costs a lot more than a 1000 hp 632 inch BBC crate motor, but it will make good power and it looks like a Mopar

It is that is now easier than ever to build a 700 or 800 hp BB Mopar that uses "classic" Mopar parts and looks like a Mopar. If a guy is happy with a 9 or even 8 second door slammer than everything is cool. I don't worry about this too much. Buick, Olds and Pontiac guys have had this issue for years. Ford guys have some nice options and Chevy BB guys have tons of options. Mopar guys are better off than the BOP guys but don't have the factory support of either the Ford or Chevy guys. Just the way it is due to decisions made by Mopar Performance years ago. They could've solved the block problem 20 years ago but they didn't. They could've solved the head problem 20 years ago but they didn't. Nothing we can do about their failure to make good decisions years ago.

Trick Flow did a big favor for the 600 to 800 hp crowd, and Indy still has good options for the 700 to 900 hp crowd so 90% of the bracket racers are covered. It is just the die hard Mopar guys who want to make more than 1000 hp who have it tough.
I would think this is where people get into weight loss of the vehicle and class being raced in for what you can do with a wedge engine mopar based.

Last edited by Clanton; 10/06/22 01:02 PM.

GOTBOOST!New improved with Victor heads.
http://www.enginelabs.com/mopar-big-bloc...t-of-necessity/
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: GTX MATT] #3083862
10/06/22 03:54 PM
10/06/22 03:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by GTX MATT
Originally Posted by AndyF
Originally Posted by Hot 340
I saw a pair on display at summit in Ohio. They were pee wee stuff compared to the other brands offerings. They looked like 200 cc heads🤣


Yes, Mopar BB heads are very small compared to something like a BB Chevy head. That is why it is easier to make power with a big BBC than a big Mopar BB. The TF270 heads provide the average backyard builder with a good 700 head. A pro engine builder can get 800 hp out a set of TF270 heads but it gets hard to make more than that NA.

If you want to run a BBC then you can buy a 1000 hp pump gas street engine. The BBC has become a much better engine for making power over the last 30 years because GM has continued to upgrade the design. Mopar never upgraded the big block design so we're still stuck with two piece rear main seal and other outdated features. I have a customer with a Mark VI big block and it has substantial upgrades when compared to the muscle car era design.


And Mopar guys will put a standard port window on a 500+ cubic inch engine for fear of losing torque. A std port B/RB is comparable in size to a “peanut port” BBC head.


A 6.4 hemi head is about as big as any common BB heads and does not lack any TQ when slapped on a 5.7 hemi, even max ported to around 400CFM with a huge cross section they make plenty of TQ on a 6.4. I have come to the conclusion a small port is just a governor to keep it from making too much power at higher RPM if you can even get it to turn very many RPM. A 500+ BB will still make plenty of TQ with some huge Gen II hemi heads. Cam timing events are for adjusting TQ, cylinder heads are for building HP. A BBM is no different than any other engine.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Twostick] #3083863
10/06/22 03:56 PM
10/06/22 03:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by Twostick
Originally Posted by AndyF
Originally Posted by Hot 340
I saw a pair on display at summit in Ohio. They were pee wee stuff compared to the other brands offerings. They looked like 200 cc heads🤣


Yes, Mopar BB heads are very small compared to something like a BB Chevy head. That is why it is easier to make power with a big BBC than a big Mopar BB. The TF270 heads provide the average backyard builder with a good 700 head. A pro engine builder can get 800 hp out a set of TF270 heads but it gets hard to make more than that NA.

If you want to run a BBC then you can buy a 1000 hp pump gas street engine. The BBC has become a much better engine for making power over the last 30 years because GM has continued to upgrade the design. Mopar never upgraded the big block design so we're still stuck with two piece rear main seal and other outdated features. I have a customer with a Mark VI big block and it has substantial upgrades when compared to the muscle car era design.


Has ANYBODY updated the combustion chamber from 1958 yet? That seems like it should be a zero $$$ cost upgrade because you have to make a pattern for the mold anyway. Make it a shape that works better. Lots to copy from.

Kevin


In order to get a significantly better chamber in a BBM head they need to move the valves because they are in a weird spot, this requires different pistons and most guys just don't want to be bothered with all those changes.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: HotRodDave] #3083867
10/06/22 04:13 PM
10/06/22 04:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas
I have done both and the costs are not that much greater for a BBM than a BBC at 1000 HP. Cranks, Rods, Pitons, Rings, Lifters, Cams, Oiling parts, a;l those are are the SAME cost pretty much. I have both so I know. Feel free to price and aluminum BB chevy block and get back to me. Heads of similar performance potential are pretty much the same cost. Porting is porting don't matter what head it is the price is the same. The difference is options for the BBC guys, the initial cost of an ironblock is another, although most those lower dollar Chevy blocks need work to make them useful at that power leve,like cam cores, lifter sizing so that brings the cost more inline. Also the secondary market for BBC stuff is much larger than the BBM one. Building new it is a few grand either way, so if a few grand is gonna break your budget on a 1000hp combo then maybe you need to rethink your hobby and finances.

I have seen more than my fair share of crate engines from many of the larger name Chevy shops. Most do not perform anywhere near their posted HP numbers. The exception to that rule is Reher and Morrison, and again feel free to look at their prices and get back to me. I have seen the inside of them as well and many are downright SCARY when you get in there, the lack of attention to detail and quality workmanship, again Reher is a glaring exception again. There are the nicest pieces you will find.

Bottom line IMO. Many Mopar guys shy away from trying to make HP. Because they keep getting told it cant be done, or it cost to much, or its way cheaper to build a BBC. Some are scared of the RPM it might take to get there. Others don't want to or refuse to come around to more modern thinking on making HP. Or most the most likely reason is they are happy making 7-800 and running where they are. Nothing wrong with it.BUt its what keeps the Mopar stuff limited to what we have. I am on my third Predator build right now. Was it cheap HELL no. Could I build a BBC for less, yeah maybe 2500-3000 less. In the end it will make a bit over 1100hp and be a reliable bracket/.90 engine for me. Have a 582 aluminum BBC going together right next to it as well. And the costs difference is nominal and the Predator will make more power.


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Al_Alguire] #3083880
10/06/22 04:48 PM
10/06/22 04:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,458
Sydney,Australia
tex013 Offline
top fuel
tex013  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,458
Sydney,Australia
thanks Al for your insight , again .
Always the case of " I want vs I need " .
I see it at work , everyone wants a 700+ HP motor for tootling around and going to the shops . My opinion is unless you are racing why bother ? As long as you can do a burn out on the street just lie about the HP grin .
Andy thanks also withyour comments re Tflow and the boost to a lot of mid level bracket racers . I'm one of them . Now all I need is to get rid of 100lbs or so from the Satellite .
Don't forget some racers dont want the extra SFI parts turnover or extra safety gear that a higher HP / ET car brings . So that sorta easy 700 or so HP number is fine , especially in a dual purpose car .
And yes I have the TF 270s on my 505 and laugh with fellow Ford/Chev racers about how small the port sizes are , even @ Max Wedge size .

Tex

Last edited by tex013; 10/06/22 04:50 PM.

New best ET 10.259@129.65 .
New best MPH 130.32
Finally fitted a solid cam,
stepped it up a bit more
3690lbs through the mufflers
New World block 3780lbs 10.278@130.80 . Wowser 10.253@130.24 footbraking from 1500rpm
Power by Tex's Automotive
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: tex013] #3084006
10/07/22 10:18 AM
10/07/22 10:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline OP
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,118
Loudoun County, VA
^^^ up

Big ports iz scary... haha


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: How "big" is a TF270 intake port? [Re: Al_Alguire] #3084650
10/09/22 08:30 PM
10/09/22 08:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,136
Melbourne , Australia
LA360 Offline
master
LA360  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,136
Melbourne , Australia
Originally Posted by Al_Alguire
I have done both and the costs are not that much greater for a BBM than a BBC at 1000 HP. Cranks, Rods, Pitons, Rings, Lifters, Cams, Oiling parts, a;l those are are the SAME cost pretty much. I have both so I know. Feel free to price and aluminum BB chevy block and get back to me. Heads of similar performance potential are pretty much the same cost. Porting is porting don't matter what head it is the price is the same. The difference is options for the BBC guys, the initial cost of an ironblock is another, although most those lower dollar Chevy blocks need work to make them useful at that power leve,like cam cores, lifter sizing so that brings the cost more inline. Also the secondary market for BBC stuff is much larger than the BBM one. Building new it is a few grand either way, so if a few grand is gonna break your budget on a 1000hp combo then maybe you need to rethink your hobby and finances.

I have seen more than my fair share of crate engines from many of the larger name Chevy shops. Most do not perform anywhere near their posted HP numbers. The exception to that rule is Reher and Morrison, and again feel free to look at their prices and get back to me. I have seen the inside of them as well and many are downright SCARY when you get in there, the lack of attention to detail and quality workmanship, again Reher is a glaring exception again. There are the nicest pieces you will find.

Bottom line IMO. Many Mopar guys shy away from trying to make HP. Because they keep getting told it cant be done, or it cost to much, or its way cheaper to build a BBC. Some are scared of the RPM it might take to get there. Others don't want to or refuse to come around to more modern thinking on making HP. Or most the most likely reason is they are happy making 7-800 and running where they are. Nothing wrong with it.BUt its what keeps the Mopar stuff limited to what we have. I am on my third Predator build right now. Was it cheap HELL no. Could I build a BBC for less, yeah maybe 2500-3000 less. In the end it will make a bit over 1100hp and be a reliable bracket/.90 engine for me. Have a 582 aluminum BBC going together right next to it as well. And the costs difference is nominal and the Predator will make more power.


I've seen a few crate engines make their way down here, only to ruin the crankshaft or eat itself in some way after about 2000 klms. As Al pointed out, no attention to detail.

The Trickflow stuff is nicely made, but most BBM heads are just plain tiny port wise.


Alan Jones
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1