Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: Uberpube]
#3045721
05/27/22 07:33 PM
05/27/22 07:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,118 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,118
MN
|
Trick flow 270's, Max wedge. The 270’s were worth 45hp over the 240’s. Other than the intake being slightly different, the engine was the exact same. If you have hood clearance, the 270’s are a no brainer.
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: JERICOGTX]
#3045740
05/27/22 08:47 PM
05/27/22 08:47 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 743 Southern Alberta
Uberpube
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 743
Southern Alberta
|
Trick flow 270's, Max wedge. The 270’s were worth 45hp over the 240’s. Other than the intake being slightly different, the engine was the exact same. If you have hood clearance, the 270’s are a no brainer. Mine is going in a truck with a 3" body lift, I could probably run a tunnel ram without a hood scoop. So no big torque drop and did the power peak at the same Rpm?
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: Uberpube]
#3045748
05/27/22 10:01 PM
05/27/22 10:01 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,848 Wichita
GY3
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,848
Wichita
|
I was underwhelmed by their results.
Maybe because I'm used to seeing what these combos make with 60 more cubes and metric ring packs, bigger cam etc.
'63 Dodge 330
11.19 @ 121 mph Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs.
9.92 @ 135mph with a 350 shot of nitrous and 93 octane pump. 1.43 60 ft. 3,750 lbs.
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: Uberpube]
#3045750
05/27/22 10:09 PM
05/27/22 10:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,118 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,118
MN
|
Didn’t lose torque at all.
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: GY3]
#3045751
05/27/22 10:11 PM
05/27/22 10:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,118 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,118
MN
|
I was underwhelmed by their results.
Maybe because I'm used to seeing what these combos make with 60 more cubes and metric ring packs, bigger cam etc. 45 extra HP, for a mild hydraulic roller cam, and heavy TRW pistons, was impressive I thought. Remember that short block was built by Dulcich in high school.
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: JERICOGTX]
#3045837
05/28/22 10:23 AM
05/28/22 10:23 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 743 Southern Alberta
Uberpube
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 743
Southern Alberta
|
Didn’t lose torque at all. That's good to know. I was bugging Richard Holdener to do this test a while back, so glad someone finally did it, maybe Holdener could do a 500 incher. So the take away is that the cam and intake probably dictate power band more? I should buy a motortrend subscription, but my internet connection isn't that great.
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: Uberpube]
#3045858
05/28/22 11:11 AM
05/28/22 11:11 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201 Texas
Chief
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201
Texas
|
I watched the episode. Torque and HP increased throughout the RPM range tested over the 240's. Pretty good increase.
Now if they would stick a set of ported 440-1s on it to see if there is any difference. B1 or Predators would not be a fair test because of piston change. 440-1 would be a lifter and rocker change but that is something that can happen with the engine still in the car.
Dave
Dave Covey
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: AndyF]
#3045864
05/28/22 11:20 AM
05/28/22 11:20 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201 Texas
Chief
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201
Texas
|
Nice article Andy. Did you ever get to test after the intake was worked over?
Dave
Dave Covey
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: Chief]
#3045893
05/28/22 12:40 PM
05/28/22 12:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,260 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,260
Oregon
|
Nice article Andy. Did you ever get to test after the intake was worked over?
Dave Yes, the ported intake picked up 25 hp over the cast intake. I think the best we ever made with that 470 was 780 hp. That was a pump gas engine so we had to be super careful with the camshaft selection. Higher compression would've allowed us to make more power. I think we could've gone over 800 hp if we had put a little more compression in the engine. I've done quite a few 270 head engine since then but none have made that much power. Most engines we do are for street guy or bracket guys and neither of them want to break the bank to pick up the last 50 hp in a build. https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/dyno-tested-vacuum-pump-help-engine-make-power/
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#3045945
05/28/22 03:41 PM
05/28/22 03:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,260 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,260
Oregon
|
The 470 that Compu-Flow is building for me will have the 270's. Not sure on the cam yet but we both kind of want to try the trick flow cam. I will be thrilled if this engine is a legit 600 hp. A pump gas 470 with 270 heads and the TF hyd roller cam will make 600 hp on the dyno as long as you use a good intake manifold. Best intake if you want 600 hp would be a port matched TF intake.
|
|
|
Re: Engine masters max wedge episode
[Re: AndyF]
#3045962
05/28/22 04:41 PM
05/28/22 04:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,553 USA
hudsonhornet7x
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,553
USA
|
The 470 that Compu-Flow is building for me will have the 270's. Not sure on the cam yet but we both kind of want to try the trick flow cam. I will be thrilled if this engine is a legit 600 hp. A pump gas 470 with 270 heads and the TF hyd roller cam will make 600 hp on the dyno as long as you use a good intake manifold. Best intake if you want 600 hp would be a port matched TF intake. Thanks for the advice. I do have a new trick flow intake now but it has not been port matched yet. Nice to know I am headed in the right direction.
|
|
|
|
|