Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads #294888
04/21/09 10:46 AM
04/21/09 10:46 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,187
clarks summit pa
73cuda340 Offline OP
super stock
73cuda340  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,187
clarks summit pa
What do you guys think would be a better choice for my car, the edelbrocks or the x heads? I currently have an LD 340 intake, Comp XE268 cam, Hooker competition headers with 2.5" exhaust, thermoquad carburetor and low compression 340. Would the power gained by the Edelbrock's be worth the $1400 for the heads? I'm on a tight budget so I don't want to spend the money if the gain wont be worthwhile. I dont have either set of heads right now so I'll be getting a set of either. Im trying to get this car to go 12's if possible.


1973 Cuda 528 all aluminum Hemi, 4 speed, 3.23 Sure-Grip, (JA5) Silver Frost Metallic 1973 Challenger Rallye 340 1985 W150 Power Ram prospector 1986 Camaro IROC-Z 305 tpi
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294889
04/21/09 10:55 AM
04/21/09 10:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,542
BROOK PARK, OH
WILD BILL Offline
Senior Member of the Junior Dragster Club
WILD BILL  Offline
Senior Member of the Junior Dragster Club

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,542
BROOK PARK, OH
I don't have a lot of compression in my 440 but when I switched from iron head to the Eddy's I really noticed the difference. It might havd had to do with it being the last step to getting my combnation "matched up" but it was like a new motor.

Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: WILD BILL] #294890
04/21/09 11:04 AM
04/21/09 11:04 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,343
MARYLAND
69Cuda340S Offline
master
69Cuda340S  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,343
MARYLAND
Go with the Edelbrock closed chamber 360 head. That will get the compression up and the Edelbrocks flow a lot more then x heads. It is advised that you have the valve job and valve guides looked over by a machine shop prior to installing.

Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294891
04/21/09 11:05 AM
04/21/09 11:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,097
Tulsa OK
Bad340fish Offline
master
Bad340fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,097
Tulsa OK
By the time you buy a set of X heads and get them machined to be race ready your going to be withing range of the edelbrock heads IMO. I would go with the Edelbrock heads as they are a nice piece. Plus you will have more room for potential ET after porting etc.

You could run 12s easily with either cylinder head.


68 Barracuda Formula S 340
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294892
04/21/09 11:08 AM
04/21/09 11:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,799
Portage,michigan
B
B3422W5 Offline
I Live Here
B3422W5  Offline
I Live Here
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,799
Portage,michigan
Quote:

What do you guys think would be a better choice for my car, the edelbrocks or the x heads? I currently have an LD 340 intake, Comp XE268 cam, Hooker competition headers with 2.5" exhaust, thermoquad carburetor and low compression 340. Would the power gained by the Edelbrock's be worth the $1400 for the heads? I'm on a tight budget so I don't want to spend the money if the gain wont be worthwhile. I dont have either set of heads right now so I'll be getting a set of either. Im trying to get this car to go 12's if possible.





Years ago, i had my original 340 motor in my duster. the shortblock was untouched as it came from the factory.So, 10.5 compression.

I made the following changes to it.

230/238 hughes hydralic cam
airgap, 750/3310 vacuum secondary holley carb. 1 5/8 tube cheapie headers.
i had bone stock 2.02 j heads on it.

I took bone stock out of the box eddie heads and bolted them on the car, and went to the track.
The car , on the first outing, picked up 3.5 tenths over its previious best before swapping the eddies on. Subsequent tuning and testing resulted in it picking up a total of 4 tenths over factory 2.02 heads.
With the 10 inch coan convertor i had, and the 4.10 gears i was running, the car had previously went a best of exactly 13 flat.

With the eddies on it, it clipped off 12.60's consistantly.
I think had i stepped up the smallish cam, it would have run even better, also maybe touching up the eddies valve job, etc.

All this time i ran the stock stamped rockers, pushrods, etc.

At that point i swapped out the factory motor and went to a 416..............

your results might vary...

Hope this info helps

Last edited by B3422W5; 04/21/09 11:10 AM.

69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight
418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam, footbrake street/strip car

1.41 best 60 foot
6.54 @ 105.20



Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294893
04/21/09 11:21 AM
04/21/09 11:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
patrick Offline
I Live Here
patrick  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
Quote:

What do you guys think would be a better choice for my car, the edelbrocks or the x heads? I currently have an LD 340 intake, Comp XE268 cam, Hooker competition headers with 2.5" exhaust, thermoquad carburetor and low compression 340. Would the power gained by the Edelbrock's be worth the $1400 for the heads? I'm on a tight budget so I don't want to spend the money if the gain wont be worthwhile. I dont have either set of heads right now so I'll be getting a set of either. Im trying to get this car to go 12's if possible.




on a budget? get the enginequest "Iron Rams" hughes is selling in the new products section for $800. get the 318B's with the LA intake pattern.

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...e=0#Post5090712

can use any chevy rocker or stock magnum rockers (~$80/set new), need to measure and get pushrods (~$50 from summit), and need magnum head bolts (~$20).

LA valve covers work on them. any X head that needs valves/guides/springs/seats is going to be more than $800 to build up, and don't flow as good as the EQ's....


1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD
1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!***
2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T
2017 Grand Cherokee Overland
2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: patrick] #294894
04/21/09 09:30 PM
04/21/09 09:30 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,187
clarks summit pa
73cuda340 Offline OP
super stock
73cuda340  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,187
clarks summit pa
Has anybody tested the two heads to see the gains?


1973 Cuda 528 all aluminum Hemi, 4 speed, 3.23 Sure-Grip, (JA5) Silver Frost Metallic 1973 Challenger Rallye 340 1985 W150 Power Ram prospector 1986 Camaro IROC-Z 305 tpi
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294895
04/21/09 09:41 PM
04/21/09 09:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
T
Triple Threat Offline
master
Triple Threat  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
Quote:

Has anybody tested the two heads to see the gains?




Here is my experience

Low compression 340, similar camshaft to yours, Old Offy intake, 2.02 valve 915 casting Iron heads (basically the same exact thing as an "X" head,)2800 converter, 3.91 gears and a 26" tire The car went 13.80's consistently.

WITH NO OTHER CHANGES I replaced the iron heads and reassembled the car with 63 cc edelbrocks. First day to the track the car went 12.81@106mph. Took a full second off my ET's. You have to understand I gained about 1 point in compression doing this swap as well going from 8.5:1 to 9.5:1. The edelbrocks have a smaller CC combustion chamber, so that was likely part of the reason for the power increase.

Cliff Notes :
My car went 13.80's @99mph
I put on a set of edelbrocks and the car went 12.80's @106mph
I was very happy with my purchase

You should get a set too.


-Dustin
67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi
68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294896
04/21/09 09:42 PM
04/21/09 09:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
cbarracuda Offline
mopar
cbarracuda  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
Power gained? Maybe with a lot more compression, full ported X heads are better. For that price I would suggest W2.

Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 69Cuda340S] #294897
04/21/09 10:32 PM
04/21/09 10:32 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 660
San Diego
formula S Offline
mopar
formula S  Offline
mopar

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 660
San Diego
Quote:

Go with the Edelbrock closed chamber 360 head. That will get the compression up and the Edelbrocks flow a lot more then x heads. It is advised that you have the valve job and valve guides looked over by a machine shop prior to installing.



Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: cbarracuda] #294898
04/22/09 12:14 AM
04/22/09 12:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,826
las vegas
70AARcuda Offline
master
70AARcuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,826
las vegas
Quote:

Power gained? Maybe with a lot more compression, full ported X heads are better. For that price I would suggest W2.




the guy only wants to get into the 12s...

the price for w2 rockers these days will cost pretty close to 1000.00...then he needs new intake manifold, headers, pushrods, plus the cost of the heads and machine work...

the eddies are a very cost effective buy..the eddies out of the box will get ya there.


Tony

70 AARCuda Vitamin C
71 Dart Swinger 360 10.318 @ 128.22(10-04-14 Bakersfield)
71 Demon 360 10.666 @122.41 (01-29-17 @ Las Vegas)
71 Duster 408 (10.29 @ 127.86 3/16/19 Las Vegas)
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294899
04/22/09 06:57 AM
04/22/09 06:57 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
off the grid
340B5 Offline
pro stock
340B5  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
off the grid
I use home ported J heads and have run 12.02 in bad air (29.5) on a windy day ~~~~~~I have $700 in them. You probably need a little more cam to go deep into the 12's.


Yeah, it's got a smallblock.
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 340B5] #294900
04/22/09 09:39 AM
04/22/09 09:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
patrick Offline
I Live Here
patrick  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
lemme repeat, hughes "IRON RAMS"

flow 95% of an eddie head for less than 5/8 the cost, come assembled with hughes 1110 springs (120lb seat, 300lb@.5" lift, 360 lb/in rate).


here's from hughes website (I cropped so they're side by side):



nice apples to apples comparison since these are all done at the same shop on the same bench. the 1.92" valve enginequest heads flow nearly identical to the eddies until .5" where they give up 10cfm. X heads would flow pretty much the same as the '576 heads in the chart.


using stock mag rockers would up the lift on your cam to .509/512" lift.

stock magnum rockers are $9.69/cyl from rockauto.com, or you can use any aftermarket chevy/amc roller rocker...scorpion performace rollers (made in florida) are $200-250 for amc apps on ebay

order the 318B's, LA intake bolts up, LA valve covers & headers bolt right up to mag heads too.

if the MP 7.625" conversion pushrods are too short (has been the case for some people), summit sells 7.65" pushrods for $63.

the comp lifters are amc style with pushrod oiling provisions, so your total cost (using OEM rockers) is about $950....or less than $1100 using some pretty nice roller rockers.

5181012-flow.jpg (372 downloads)
Last edited by patrick; 04/22/09 09:57 AM.

1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD
1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!***
2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T
2017 Grand Cherokee Overland
2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: patrick] #294901
04/22/09 09:49 AM
04/22/09 09:49 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,343
MARYLAND
69Cuda340S Offline
master
69Cuda340S  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,343
MARYLAND
For someone on a budget the Engine Quest heads are a good buy assuming he needs to buy lifters, rockers, and push rods any way. They will out flow x heads, get the compression up, and have a quench combustion chamber.

Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294902
04/22/09 11:55 AM
04/22/09 11:55 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Quote:

Has anybody tested the two heads to see the gains?




I have tested them with the seat of my pants. The Edelbrock heads made more horsepower for sure and made my car handle better than my old 2.02 iron heads. Best thing since sliced bread for SB mopars.

Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: Challenger 1] #294903
04/22/09 02:16 PM
04/22/09 02:16 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 951
Alliance, Ohio
V
Valiant_Showoff Offline
super stock
Valiant_Showoff  Offline
super stock
V

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 951
Alliance, Ohio
I replaced ported J-heads with out-of-the-box Eddies on my 360 and was very happy. It runs cooler, doesn't ever detonate and I can have them ported later if I want to go faster than my current 11.90's

Double check the valve guides before running them though.

Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: Valiant_Showoff] #294904
05/12/09 07:20 PM
05/12/09 07:20 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,187
clarks summit pa
73cuda340 Offline OP
super stock
73cuda340  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,187
clarks summit pa
I bought a set of ported J heads at carlisle for $650. Fully rebuilt and it looks like they might have been milled. Supposedly flow more than Edelbrocks out of the box, according to the guy. Well see how it goes.


1973 Cuda 528 all aluminum Hemi, 4 speed, 3.23 Sure-Grip, (JA5) Silver Frost Metallic 1973 Challenger Rallye 340 1985 W150 Power Ram prospector 1986 Camaro IROC-Z 305 tpi
Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294905
05/12/09 07:36 PM
05/12/09 07:36 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Edelbrocks.. with just a "mild" port job,mine perform extremly well probably never go back to iron heads..

Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads #294906
05/12/09 08:43 PM
05/12/09 08:43 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,495
Oregon City, OR
Baxter61 Offline
top fuel
Baxter61  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,495
Oregon City, OR
Id say if your limiting yourself between the edelbrocks and the x heads, you really need to examine how tight your budget is. Its what, $1200 for new eddys then maybe another $200 to have them checked out. So given they dont need to be fixed, your $1400 in them. You can be less that $700 into a set of irons and you will can get into the 12's fairly easy.
No, I dont think that iron heads are as good as Eddy's, and if he goes with something other than an x-head you can save some more coin on the castings. But when the budget gets really tight, $200 to $400 here or there can become pretty significant and if its the difference between going racing and sitting at home waiting for the extra cash to buy the eddy's, Id rather go racing.

Re: 340 Edelbrock heads or 340 X heads [Re: 73cuda340] #294907
05/12/09 08:54 PM
05/12/09 08:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,873
Chicken coop
dustergirl340 Offline
Chicken Little
dustergirl340  Offline
Chicken Little

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,873
Chicken coop
I'm using the original untouched X heads that came with my 340 and my car runs high 12's.

If I were starting from scratch I'd find J heads (cheaper than X and just as good) or save for Edelbrocks.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1