Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: CudaKidFam]
#2914003
04/23/21 04:00 PM
04/23/21 04:00 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,750 central il.
second 70
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,750
central il.
|
If you're building a decent HP hemi the trac-lock is a lot weaker than a power-lock. If I remember Dr. Diff said it would last @ 400 HP, power lock 600HP, and the S trac I bought from him should handle 1,000 HP. The Track-lock can handle only 400HP?? If that's the case, why would the factory put it behind a 71 Hemi at 425HP? Probably money and I believe he was talking about racing it and using it hard not just regular street driving. Somebody took the good guts out of that rear and replaced it with the weaker parts.
Last edited by second 70; 04/23/21 04:01 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: dragon slayer]
#2914691
04/25/21 09:58 AM
04/25/21 09:58 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 19 Madison
CudaKidFam
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 19
Madison
|
No. The switch over was above 4.10. 4.10 still used standard carrier. 4.56 needed the spacer or different carrier. Could be true, but for all we know the 4.10 gears that are in it NOW were not the driving factor for the lack of BOM numbers on the axle from 50 years ago. The statement from the service manual is still a possible explanation for the lack of BOM numbers on this axle.
|
|
|
Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: CudaKidFam]
#2914798
04/25/21 01:53 PM
04/25/21 01:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,130 Chicago Blackhawks
hemicar1971
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,130
Chicago Blackhawks
|
The 1971 Dana Track Lok is not the first choice for me. My 1971 Hemi Challenger exploded the 456 factory unit about with in a year once slicks were used. I have a 1970 B Body unit in the Challenger since 1972 with 538s not one problem with it and car turned high 9s with a 321 first gear Hemi Crash box 4 speed.If everything looks clean and correct put the dana in your car just be aware if you are hooking hard with good tires that there is a good chance that Track Lok could give you problems in the future. You got the Dana rear end so put it in your car, every Hemi deserves a Dana behind it.
1971 HEMI E BODY REGISTRY
|
|
|
Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: hemicar1971]
#2914976
04/25/21 09:52 PM
04/25/21 09:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,909 Nebraska
4406bbl
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,909
Nebraska
|
The 1971 Dana Track Lok is not the first choice for me. My 1971 Hemi Challenger exploded the 456 factory unit about with in a year once slicks were used. I have a 1970 B Body unit in the Challenger since 1972 with 538s not one problem with it and car turned high 9s with a 321 first gear Hemi Crash box 4 speed.If everything looks clean and correct put the dana in your car just be aware if you are hooking hard with good tires that there is a good chance that Track Lok could give you problems in the future. You got the Dana rear end so put it in your car, every Hemi deserves a Dana behind it. You have that right Trac locks are junk with modern sticky tires. My 340 4-speed e-body 8-3/4 has slightly twisted axles, it is getting a dana powerlock out of a 67 b-body.
|
|
|
Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: CudaKidFam]
#2914982
04/25/21 10:17 PM
04/25/21 10:17 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,399 VA
dragon slayer
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,399
VA
|
No. The switch over was above 4.10. 4.10 still used standard carrier. 4.56 needed the spacer or different carrier. Could be true, but for all we know the 4.10 gears that are in it NOW were not the driving factor for the lack of BOM numbers on the axle from 50 years ago. The statement from the service manual is still a possible explanation for the lack of BOM numbers on this axle. Is true, not could be. Look at the options available from purchase books. Look at the Parts manual. You could get a 3.54 or a 4.10 gear. The Dana differential case supported both. The Race literature and the Dana documents support, along with anyone who has raced one or rebuilt them, that the switch over to a different case is 4.56. This gear has a much smaller pinion and the ring gear is required to move over about 1/4". They had a case with a thicker mounting flange, or racers would weld on a spacer plate to shift the ring gear over. The higher ratio was a a dealer available option, but only the carrier was changed with the gear, not the axle housing. I know you want this to be a factory line part, but I think the wisdom is that production cars had Dana's with the known BOM numbers. Either 3.54, or 4.10. Getting a 4.10 did not require the axle housing to be changed or the differential carrier. You have a Dana. Maybe some one knows what the BOM was if you bought a housing from a dealer. You number is more like a Dana part number then an assembly BOM. Go to the spicer website and you can access the parts catalogs for the 68-78 Dana rears for Dodge/Plymouth, and the other manufactures that used it.
|
|
|
Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: dragon slayer]
#2915138
04/26/21 10:58 AM
04/26/21 10:58 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 19 Madison
CudaKidFam
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 19
Madison
|
No. The switch over was above 4.10. 4.10 still used standard carrier. 4.56 needed the spacer or different carrier. Could be true, but for all we know the 4.10 gears that are in it NOW were not the driving factor for the lack of BOM numbers on the axle from 50 years ago. The statement from the service manual is still a possible explanation for the lack of BOM numbers on this axle. Is true, not could be. Look at the options available from purchase books. Look at the Parts manual. You could get a 3.54 or a 4.10 gear. The Dana differential case supported both. The Race literature and the Dana documents support, along with anyone who has raced one or rebuilt them, that the switch over to a different case is 4.56. This gear has a much smaller pinion and the ring gear is required to move over about 1/4". They had a case with a thicker mounting flange, or racers would weld on a spacer plate to shift the ring gear over. The higher ratio was a a dealer available option, but only the carrier was changed with the gear, not the axle housing. I know you want this to be a factory line part, but I think the wisdom is that production cars had Dana's with the known BOM numbers. Either 3.54, or 4.10. Getting a 4.10 did not require the axle housing to be changed or the differential carrier. You have a Dana. Maybe some one knows what the BOM was if you bought a housing from a dealer. You number is more like a Dana part number then an assembly BOM. Go to the spicer website and you can access the parts catalogs for the 68-78 Dana rears for Dodge/Plymouth, and the other manufactures that used it. I believe you. Can't seem to find the info you've pointed to however. I don't need any more convincing that I have a real Dana. It just would be nice to figure out the numbers on the axle. And from what I've read above, if I decide to use it, I'll swap the Track-Lock for a Power-Lock.
|
|
|
Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: 71GTX471]
#2915859
04/27/21 06:55 PM
04/27/21 06:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,909 Nebraska
4406bbl
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,909
Nebraska
|
Now I feel like a dummy, didn't realize Danas had no clutch pack springs,Power-Lok 4 pinion gears Trac-Loc only 2 pinion gears,aside from having 4 pinion gears & a split carrier case what else would make a Power-Lok stronger if anything. Twin vs single drive pin for one.
|
|
|
Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: 4406bbl]
#2915914
04/27/21 09:04 PM
04/27/21 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,130 Chicago Blackhawks
hemicar1971
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,130
Chicago Blackhawks
|
Have two Danas that I did a search for information on and could never find out what they were out of. I think the number begin with 27. One is in a 1971 Hemi Cuda that was raced and the Dana has 538s and the good Lock Unit.. The other has Ladder bar brackets and the perches are move just like the first one and I could not find those numbers either.and need to take the cover off to see just what is inside. The second Dana we were told it was a 1971 but the numbers do not add up and they do not added up on the first Dana. Will have to go and collect the numbers again this weekend. I have seen 1972 B Bodies with Danas and they must be rare to find.
1971 HEMI E BODY REGISTRY
|
|
|
Re: Dana 60 Identification
[Re: 4406bbl]
#2916243
04/28/21 06:02 PM
04/28/21 06:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,907 Harriman NY
71GTX471
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,907
Harriman NY
|
Now I feel like a dummy, didn't realize Danas had no clutch pack springs,Power-Lok 4 pinion gears Trac-Loc only 2 pinion gears,aside from having 4 pinion gears & a split carrier case what else would make a Power-Lok stronger if anything. Twin vs single drive pin for one. That I knew goes along with the 4 pinion gears.
|
|
|
|
|