Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
#2878629
01/22/21 08:52 PM
01/22/21 08:52 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,895 Pittsburgh,PA
RTSrunner
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,895
Pittsburgh,PA
|
I have a friend wanting me to do an EFI conversion on .69 GTX 440 automatic trans,A/C car. It was my old boss' car and he gave it to his son to use years ago and driveability needs some help.I suggested a newer type carb (stock AVS now)and electric fuel pump to help but I think he really wants to go EFI.This engine we rebuilt back in the early '90's to mostly stock specs sans a Mopar Performance 284/.484 lift 108 cam,not many miles on it since. I don't remember where it was installed +/- or straight up on the 108.This cam has a good lope,maybe a bit much but actually runs well when ran out to a high RPM.Might this cam be a bit too agressive or difficult to tune for the Sniper EFI? If we do this I'm thinking a swap the OE iron intake for a single plane unit might be necessary,not sure if this would help tame the 484 cam characteristics.Engine is stock iron headed w/906 castings and exhaust manifolds,dual exh with an H-pipe.Of course the first thing with the cam will be a visual inspection of the lobes,car is driven infrequently and who knows how the lobes look.Any suggestions on a better cam spec/preferred LSA cam for this stocker with Sniper EFI are welcome! TIA for any and all input. ~RT
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: AndyF]
#2878782
01/23/21 08:35 AM
01/23/21 08:35 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,039 Benton, IL.
DaveRS23
Master of nothing...
|
Master of nothing...
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,039
Benton, IL.
|
Even for an EFI novice like the OP?
Master, again and still
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: DaveRS23]
#2878858
01/23/21 11:46 AM
01/23/21 11:46 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,259 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,259
Oregon
|
Even for an EFI novice like the OP? Sure, as long as he is willing to learn. It only took me a few days to figure out how to tune a Sniper. Not that difficult really. Read the instructions, watch some videos and then start trying things.
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: RTSrunner]
#2878984
01/23/21 02:45 PM
01/23/21 02:45 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,902 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,902
Bend,OR USA
|
Are you sure that cam is one of the later ones ground on the 108 LSA and not one of them ground on the 104 LSA? The early ones ground on 104 LSA installed advanced to 102 ILC don't, won't, have much vacuum at 900 RPM idle speed, maybe 5.0 inches Did I tell you I hate those Purple Shaft cams
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: CDoering]
#2879356
01/24/21 12:30 PM
01/24/21 12:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,259 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,259
Oregon
|
You don't need a Hyperspark distributor for timing control if you already have a MSD distributor. You can lock out the advance mechanism on the MSD and use a adjustable rotor to phase it properly. Also need to pay attention to good wiring practices with magnetic timing control as it is more prone to EMI. I tried that when the Sniper first came out and it didn't work very well. It turns out that the MSD distributor isn't a very good match for the Sniper. The MSD produces a sine wave signal but the Sniper wants a square wave signal which is why Holley developed the Hyperspark. The Hyperspark uses a Hall effect sensor to produce a square wave digital signal that works well with the Sniper. The Holley forum is full of people who have had trouble getting their MSD distributors to work with the Sniper. The common advice now is for people to sell their MSD distributors and use the money to buy a Hyperspark.
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: topside]
#2879439
01/24/21 02:39 PM
01/24/21 02:39 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,506 north of coder
moparx
"Butt Crack Bob"
|
"Butt Crack Bob"
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,506
north of coder
|
can the Hyperspark distributor be used on the MSD box ? i need to buy a distributor, and i don't want to do this twice. however, if i use the MSD 6AL i have now [before switching over to the Sniper system, which i can't afford at this time] i have a couple of factory distributors i could modify.
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: AndyF]
#2879597
01/24/21 07:58 PM
01/24/21 07:58 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,640 Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick
Still wishing...
|
Still wishing...
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,640
Downtown Roebuck Ont
|
You don't need a Hyperspark distributor for timing control if you already have a MSD distributor. You can lock out the advance mechanism on the MSD and use a adjustable rotor to phase it properly. Also need to pay attention to good wiring practices with magnetic timing control as it is more prone to EMI. I tried that when the Sniper first came out and it didn't work very well. It turns out that the MSD distributor isn't a very good match for the Sniper. The MSD produces a sine wave signal but the Sniper wants a square wave signal which is why Holley developed the Hyperspark. The Hyperspark uses a Hall effect sensor to produce a square wave digital signal that works well with the Sniper. The Holley forum is full of people who have had trouble getting their MSD distributors to work with the Sniper. The common advice now is for people to sell their MSD distributors and use the money to buy a Hyperspark. I had the same issue with my ancient 950 Commander. The solution was to run the MSD pickup through an GM HEI module first. That converts the sine wave to a square wave. I think it was in the installation instructions. Kevin
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: AndyF]
#2879604
01/24/21 08:14 PM
01/24/21 08:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938 Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
|
You don't need a Hyperspark distributor for timing control if you already have a MSD distributor. You can lock out the advance mechanism on the MSD and use a adjustable rotor to phase it properly. Also need to pay attention to good wiring practices with magnetic timing control as it is more prone to EMI. I tried that when the Sniper first came out and it didn't work very well. It turns out that the MSD distributor isn't a very good match for the Sniper. The MSD produces a sine wave signal but the Sniper wants a square wave signal which is why Holley developed the Hyperspark. The Hyperspark uses a Hall effect sensor to produce a square wave digital signal that works well with the Sniper. The Holley forum is full of people who have had trouble getting their MSD distributors to work with the Sniper. The common advice now is for people to sell their MSD distributors and use the money to buy a Hyperspark. Actually it works okay with a magnetic MSD distributor. Magnetic to Holley means sine wave. When I remote tune I sometimes have to be a remote mechanic as well, and what I run into with people that want to use their MSD dizzy is that the default Holley values for a magnetic pickup are wrong. The software defaults to a minimum signal voltage of zero volts. However, the instructions DO say that you should start at .35V. After I change that, my experiences have been very good. Then we have the rotor phasing issue that is mentioned above. That also must be done because the distributor must output at 50 - 60 degrees BTDC yet the rotor should be phased to its terminal at about 25 degrees BTDC. The most common reason that MSD distributors don't work well is that people didn't know where to find the instructions. I do one more thing not mentioned in the instructions - use shielded wire with the shield grounded at the Holley end.
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2879613
01/24/21 08:32 PM
01/24/21 08:32 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,895 Pittsburgh,PA
RTSrunner
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,895
Pittsburgh,PA
|
Are you sure that cam is one of the later ones ground on the 108 LSA and not one of them ground on the 104 LSA? The early ones ground on 104 LSA installed advanced to 102 ILC don't, won't, have much vacuum at 900 RPM idle speed, maybe 5.0 inches Did I tell you I hate those Purple Shaft cams Cab,I'm not sure of the exact LSA but I don't think it is a 104.From memory I'm thinking it was either 108 or106. It idles at a reasonable RPM in drive.a little lopey but not horrible.I put this together in the early 90's for my friend and haven't heard it run in probably two decades.Not sure what vacuum is but i will check when I work on it,wasn't a big concern when we put the cam in since it is a manual brake car. Thanks RT
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: Mopar_Rich]
#2879629
01/24/21 08:46 PM
01/24/21 08:46 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,640 Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick
Still wishing...
|
Still wishing...
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,640
Downtown Roebuck Ont
|
You don't need a Hyperspark distributor for timing control if you already have a MSD distributor. You can lock out the advance mechanism on the MSD and use a adjustable rotor to phase it properly. Also need to pay attention to good wiring practices with magnetic timing control as it is more prone to EMI. I tried that when the Sniper first came out and it didn't work very well. It turns out that the MSD distributor isn't a very good match for the Sniper. The MSD produces a sine wave signal but the Sniper wants a square wave signal which is why Holley developed the Hyperspark. The Hyperspark uses a Hall effect sensor to produce a square wave digital signal that works well with the Sniper. The Holley forum is full of people who have had trouble getting their MSD distributors to work with the Sniper. The common advice now is for people to sell their MSD distributors and use the money to buy a Hyperspark. Actually it works okay with a magnetic MSD distributor. Magnetic to Holley means sine wave. When I remote tune I sometimes have to be a remote mechanic as well, and what I run into with people that want to use their MSD dizzy is that the default Holley values for a magnetic pickup are wrong. The software defaults to a minimum signal voltage of zero volts. However, the instructions DO say that you should start at .35V. After I change that, my experiences have been very good. Then we have the rotor phasing issue that is mentioned above. That also must be done because the distributor must output at 50 - 60 degrees BTDC yet the rotor should be phased to its terminal at about 25 degrees BTDC. The most common reason that MSD distributors don't work well is that people didn't know where to find the instructions. I do one more thing not mentioned in the instructions - use shielded wire with the shield grounded at the Holley end. I learned that shielding lesson the hard way. Kevin
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: topside]
#2879641
01/24/21 09:00 PM
01/24/21 09:00 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,895 Pittsburgh,PA
RTSrunner
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,895
Pittsburgh,PA
|
I wouldn't think the 284/484 cam would be rowdy in a 440; in a 383/727 RR I had, it was soggy off-idle but things got happy after 3000RPM. What is this AT & AC GTX used for ? Is it a restored/#s car or a hot rod ? Changing the cam to something more modern would gain everywhere and require less crutching & less $$$. This car is basically a restored numbers match GTX except for a set of wheels,current duty is just aa a cruiser.Engine has the stock AVS carb on a stock spec 440 rebuild except for the 484 cam.Ignition is the factory points distributor,exhaust is OE manifolds into stock style duals with an H-pipe.The automatic transmission was built by a local trans guy well versed in Mopars and shifted great. Very crisp and consistent shifts at 6200 RPM (if tach was accurate) in drive.It has had many gear swaps from the original 3.23 to 4.10 at different times. I drove it from Pittsburgh PA to the Indy Mopar Nats in 1993,ran it down the IRP strip too.It did a 13.9 ET which I thought was acceptable having the stock carb and all. I wouldn't mind updating the cam,I always thought it was a bit radical for the overall package being a basically stock engine plus having AC.If the 484 shows any signs of wear I willl replace it with a newer design,a bit less aggressive. Thanks,RT
|
|
|
Re: Holley Sniper EFI vs MP484 cam
[Re: AndyF]
#2879648
01/24/21 09:15 PM
01/24/21 09:15 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,895 Pittsburgh,PA
RTSrunner
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,895
Pittsburgh,PA
|
You need to install a Hyperspark distributor with the Sniper so you can control timing. Once you can control timing and fuel it becomes fairly easy to dial in the tune. The tuning capability of EFI makes it much easier to get a big cam to work on the street. , A Hyperspark ignition is definitely on the list with this job to replace the stock points distributor.It is one reason we decided on the Holley Sniper setup for the EFI/ignition tuning capability. Thanks,RT.
|
|
|
|
|