Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? #2824899
09/25/20 11:21 AM
09/25/20 11:21 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline OP
top fuel
furious70  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
I've got a used but good 383 shortblock and OEM heads, both have been rebuilt at some point in time by people I bought them from so I don't have any details on the machine work completed. They are going into my turbocharged Fury as a small upgrade.
Do I need to be concerned about the surface smoothness to use Cometics - I don't know what the machining was finished at on either. Was running 12psi on the smog engine, looking to be in the same range on this one as well (retaining water/meth injection installed in the car).
Current engine is a smog deal with 8.5:1 CR with .020 gaskets that lived just fine. New engine is going to be around 9-9.25:1 if I use the C5461-040 gaskets I already own.

Thanks!


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: furious70] #2824931
09/25/20 12:23 PM
09/25/20 12:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,127
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,127
Bend,OR USA
Cometics need a 50RA or smoother finish on the heads and block to seal properly per Cometics instructions. 50 RA is pretty smooth, almost as smooth as glass scope
When in doubt, due without when it comes to parts your not sure of twocents


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: Cab_Burge] #2824961
09/25/20 01:19 PM
09/25/20 01:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline OP
top fuel
furious70  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
so 50RA would not be a 'typical' prep by a machine shop? Without that prep, am I better off with the normal felpro?


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: furious70] #2825016
09/25/20 03:08 PM
09/25/20 03:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,355
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,355
north of coder
as cab said, 50RA is almost like glass.
i have a GAR pocket profile surface comparator we used at work to quickly check surface finish on the shop floor.
it jumps from 32RA to 63RA, and 63RA is almost like glass as well, so you can just imagine what a 32RA finish is like ! [not to mention the lowest on the tool, which is 2RA ! eek]
i tried to take a picture of this tool, but my camera just made it look like a super polished piece of material.
this pocket tool also has different RA finishes, depending if the surface was :

honed, lapped or polished
ground with the periphery of the wheel
ground with the flat side of the wheel [blanchard]
shaped or turned
side/end milled or profiled
or milled with the periphery of the cutter.

pretty neat pocket tool, all things considered, to check against the machined deck or head surface.

and the typical machine shop "rebuilder" finish is not 50RA. sorry.
beer

Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: moparx] #2825138
09/25/20 08:52 PM
09/25/20 08:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline OP
top fuel
furious70  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
I tried to look for tools quick, it looked like the cheapest might have been $500, was I looking at the right things?


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: furious70] #2825300
09/26/20 12:40 PM
09/26/20 12:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,355
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,355
north of coder
Originally Posted by furious70
I tried to look for tools quick, it looked like the cheapest might have been $500, was I looking at the right things?


i can't answer that, as i was supplied this tool at work over 35 years ago.
it's just a 2"x4" [approximate measurements] piece of material with the profiles [examples] being approximately 1/2" square. it has a leather like pouch it is stored in.
do you have a link to what you were looking at ?
beer

Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: moparx] #2825304
09/26/20 12:58 PM
09/26/20 12:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline OP
top fuel
furious70  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
something like this, which is different than what you describe

https://www.abqindustrial.net/store...KbY0fPOqRLapYIA5rgozwEiez_kaAkF9EALw_wcB


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: Cab_Burge] #2825307
09/26/20 01:00 PM
09/26/20 01:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,270
Morrow, OH
markz528 Offline
master
markz528  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,270
Morrow, OH
Originally Posted by Cab_Burge
50 RA is pretty smooth, almost as smooth as glass scope
:


Not in my world! Technically its 50 microinches RA. In my world 50 microinches RA is only somewhat smooth, but its all relative to what you are doing. Sleeve (babbitt) bearings generally want a 16 - 32 microinches RA finish. 16 is getting pretty smooth.

Last edited by markz528; 09/26/20 01:00 PM.

67 Coronet 500 9.610 @ 139.20 mph
67 Coronet 500 (street car) 14.82 @ 94 mph
69 GTX (clone) - build in progress......
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: furious70] #2825344
09/26/20 03:09 PM
09/26/20 03:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,307
BC, Canada
Black_Bee Offline
pro stock
Black_Bee  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,307
BC, Canada
Originally Posted by furious70
I've got a used but good 383 shortblock and OEM heads, both have been rebuilt at some point in time by people I bought them from so I don't have any details on the machine work completed. They are going into my turbocharged Fury as a small upgrade.
Do I need to be concerned about the surface smoothness to use Cometics - I don't know what the machining was finished at on either. Was running 12psi on the smog engine, looking to be in the same range on this one as well (retaining water/meth injection installed in the car).
Current engine is a smog deal with 8.5:1 CR with .020 gaskets that lived just fine. New engine is going to be around 9-9.25:1 if I use the C5461-040 gaskets I already own.

Thanks!


I used some Cometics on my 383 w/ Edelbrock heads when I had the engine apart to gap the rings for a turbo. I did not do anything other than clean the surfaces for prep. I sprayed the gaskets with some copper spray and put em on. So far it has held 7psi of boost (with a plan to go to 12psi).

I am not an experienced engine builder, but I hope this info helps

beer

Last edited by Black_Bee; 09/26/20 03:09 PM.

Paul
'69 Super Bee 383 EFI Turbo
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: furious70] #2825503
09/27/20 12:03 AM
09/27/20 12:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 875
Missouri
J
jwb123 Offline
super stock
jwb123  Offline
super stock
J

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 875
Missouri
MLS gaskets are made with thin sandwich of stainless steel, stainless is very tough but is so hard it will not conform to any irregularities, hence the need for a 50ra surface finish. Back in the day we used single layer steel gaskets coated with aluminum paint, or cooper coat, the paint and copper coat was there to fill small surface irregularities. The best old school gaskets are copper, copper is soft and conforms, and then with heat, work hardens and gets tough. I believe top fuel still uses them, so since money for gaskets is not an issue, they must be good right? composition gaskets like say a fel pro seal great, but may give it up over time, ask any mechanic working on cars in the 80's and 90's how many head gaskets they installed. Most of which failed just about the 150,000 mile mark. They helped me raise my family.
My experience is that for a normally aspirated engine, if you don't have the correct surface finish for MLR gaskets, a composition gasket works fine, used many of them up to 14 to 1 compression, and never had an issue. The only engines I have ever had a problem with head gaskets on a performance engine were the ones that only have four bolts per cylinder, like a 340 LA for example, they get a copper gasket with a o-ring in the block, with high compression. The guys that hop up diesel's what do they use? they dump the MLR gasket and use a copper gasket with a fire ring installed. At least the truck pullers around here do.
Gasket companies went to MLR gaskets because of issues with OEM engines, 20 years ago, so that is the technology they are using, which may or may not be what you need with an older performance muscle car engine.

Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: jwb123] #2825516
09/27/20 01:12 AM
09/27/20 01:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,136
Melbourne , Australia
LA360 Offline
master
LA360  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,136
Melbourne , Australia
Not particularly scientific I know, but the "Fingernail trick" would probably answer your surface roughness question. If the surface catches your finger as you drag your finger over the surface, it's too rough for a MLS gasket.


Alan Jones
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: LA360] #2825653
09/27/20 01:46 PM
09/27/20 01:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline OP
top fuel
furious70  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
I appreciate the inputs, sounds like traditional felpro is a better choice for me.


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: furious70] #2826366
09/29/20 09:03 AM
09/29/20 09:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline OP
top fuel
furious70  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
Researching other options based on y'alls input, what about Felpro's permatorque MLS that's good to 80Ra, anyone have experience with those vs the traditional 1009 gasket?


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: furious70] #2826470
09/29/20 02:01 PM
09/29/20 02:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,127
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,127
Bend,OR USA
The 1009 bore size was originally design for the 426 and 383 4.250 bore size so they are marginal to no good on 440 and 400 blocks bored over size scope twocents
I've used a bunch of them with no problems on the deck sealing with out the receiver grooves they, Fel Pro, recommend when using them up

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 09/29/20 02:03 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Cometics on a used engine - surface concerns? [Re: Cab_Burge] #2826547
09/29/20 05:44 PM
09/29/20 05:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
T
TRENDZ Offline
master
TRENDZ  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
If you can find the felpro mls, and your surfaces are decent/not pitted or scratched, you’ll be fine.
I honestly think you would be fine with a felpro composition gasket. I strongly recommend studs. I used composition gaskets on mine with iron heads. At around 20 pounds of boost they would leave evidence of combustion lines on my firewall and back of the alternator, but never actually failed. Went with copper/ o ring when I switched to aluminum heads.
Caution with iron heads on a turbo b engine... the extreme heat swings will likely crack the cylinder heads externally in a horizontal line Just below the two center exhaust ports. If you suddenly develop coolant leaks, this is a likely source.


"use it 'till it breaks, replace as needed"






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1