Re: Do these bore #'s look good?
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#2682558
07/29/19 10:57 PM
07/29/19 10:57 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,303 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,303
Bend,OR USA
|
What is the bottom number on #6 on the outside of that cylinder? If it is above.200 I would be glad to use it in a heartbeat How far are you wanting to bore it out to,+.030,+.040, +.060 or what size?
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Do these bore #'s look good?
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#2682574
07/30/19 12:38 AM
07/30/19 12:38 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,264 New York, USA
Chargerfan68
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,264
New York, USA
|
Not that i’m experienced enough with sonic testing or owning a large sample of blocks, but can those numbers be right?? I’ve never heard of bore thickness in the .600” range. Or even .500”+ for that matter within a stock block. I could be totally off base, but i thought some of the afternarket blocks are proud to have .300”+.
1.50 60Ft. , 10.75@ 127MPH Hauling 3900 LBS.
|
|
|
Re: Do these bore #'s look good?
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#2682626
07/30/19 09:44 AM
07/30/19 09:44 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,912 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,912
S.E. Michigan
|
Just my humble opinion.... these numbers seem too good to be true.
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: Do these bore #'s look good?
[Re: ZIPPY]
#2682634
07/30/19 09:58 AM
07/30/19 09:58 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 194 Springtown Pa
Ray408G3Hemi
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 194
Springtown Pa
|
Just my humble opinion.... these numbers seem too good to be true. I can tell you there are double what the 400 that was in my daughters 76,D100 are
1963 Thunderbolt 496FE 10.80 (still a work in progress) 1968 Mustang slow a$$ 428 FE 1971 Boss 351 Mustang 11.20@115mph 1993 Lightning 10.61 @ 129mph 408Ci A3 headed NA 1996 Viper GTS 2001 Lightning 8.99 @ 155MPH 5.4 Mod Motor 2009 Ram 9.65@144MPH 463CI G3 NA 2010 Challenger 9.91 @ 139MPH 408CI G3ci NA 2019 F150 (local dealer's Lightning package) ..11.90s
|
|
|
Re: Do these bore #'s look good?
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#2682707
07/30/19 01:00 PM
07/30/19 01:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,912 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,912
S.E. Michigan
|
The numbers are thicker than a World block.... I don't want to be negative...so I'd say...Hey, anything is possible! Except that...that isn't
Last edited by ZIPPY; 07/30/19 01:11 PM.
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: Do these bore #'s look good?
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#2682820
07/30/19 07:10 PM
07/30/19 07:10 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544 Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
|
Absolutely not good numbers at all. Either they are fake, or someone doesnt know how to calibrate their sonic tester. You first do whats called a " probe zero", then you calibrate it to a known and measurable thickness.
RIP Monte Smith
Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.
WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
|
|
|
|
|