Re: Profesional Results?
[Re: _Scott_]
#25919
09/30/06 11:15 AM
09/30/06 11:15 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379 Rancho Cordova, CA
Exit1965
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379
Rancho Cordova, CA
|
Quote:
If you look far enough back in the thread, one person with a lot of detailing experience did do a test on a motorcycle gas tank. He posted a few pics that showed results every bit as good as I would expect from a very good body shop, and much better than the run-of-the-mill body shop.
That was Admactanium.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25921
09/30/06 02:10 PM
09/30/06 02:10 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575 Canada
Marq
mopar addict
|
mopar addict
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575
Canada
|
Quote:
Here are the results of two coats of Brightside Gloss Black, both rolled without any thinning of the paint.
I'm going to give the paint a month to fully cure and then I'll start the final wetsanding and polishing. Only thirty days to go......
Oh, and the total cost of this paint job was $39.90 AUD. $37.50 for 1 litre of Brightside and 2 foam rollers @ $1.20 each. I love cheap!!!!!
That little Miata looks just as sweet as any of them driving around this town and you seem to have nailed it good enough with the rollers to fool folks into thinking it was sprayed. Sweet !
.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25922
09/30/06 04:30 PM
09/30/06 04:30 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hello Everybody. I'm new to this forum. It was linked from a Jeep Cherokee forum, and I stayed up all last night reading about this technique. I'm hoping to do my Cherokee next spring.
Marq: have you tried using a clear coat over the Brightside? Also ... do you have some more pics of your completely finished projects?
I tried to search for this, but this thread is humongous
Thanks!!
Last edited by MontanaMan; 09/30/06 04:34 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25923
09/30/06 04:41 PM
09/30/06 04:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,405 Southern, Ca.
69DartGT
moparts member
|
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,405
Southern, Ca.
|
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Exit1965]
#25924
09/30/06 05:49 PM
09/30/06 05:49 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Thanks for the compliments Exit and Marq. The pics show the car to be better than it looks in the metal/plastic, but once it is wetsanded and polished, it should look just like any bc/cc job. The paint is pretty tough already compared to the original paint. While I was bolting in the roll cage I dropped a half inch drive ratchet fitted with an extension bar onto the paint and it left a tiny mark on the paint.There is a fair bit of weight in that ratchet so I was impressed to see such a small mark afterwards. Years ago I dropped a nut onto the original paint and it chipped the paint right down to the base coat.... This leads my thinking to another aspect of our 'rolled' paint jobs that no-one has really touched upon. The costs of repairing the typical minor dings that many people get in their cars. This is a pic of some minor rear end damage to a guy's miata in my local club. The bumper wasn't damaged apart from the paint and the total bill for his repair job came to $2700 AUD. He claimed it on insurance and only had to pay the $500 AUD excess. People on our local forum were congratulating him on 'dodging the bullet' with his insurance company covering most of the very high bill. They were saying that he was lucky that it only cost him $500. The same situation for us would cost about nothing. We could get some of our left-over paint, fix it and it wouldn't cost us a cent. Our paint jobs give us the opportunity to save heaps of money on our repairs as well. 69Charger, you are an automotive DIY God!!!
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25925
09/30/06 06:49 PM
09/30/06 06:49 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379 Rancho Cordova, CA
Exit1965
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379
Rancho Cordova, CA
|
Hey Brightside guys. I'm giving it a shot, I picked up a quart of Hatteras Off White today. In fact first I picked up regular off white, which on the nice color card I got looked like canvas white, but when I got that home it was closer to regular white. So I returned the off white. Hatteras off white is a better match to canvas white, and since I've already painted the door jambs and engine bay a close enough color, plus the fact that the color is so close, I can problably get away with 2 quarts to do the whole car. The off white that I ended up returning, I put a foam brush in there and painted a tiny spot under my hood (full coverage) to see the color difference. At this point, it's dried to the touch and is already more scratch resistant than rustoleum would have been in the same amount of time. I am not sure if I'll try to thin (just to try to avoid orange peel) with mineral spirits since that's an ingredient, or perhaps penetrol. This is feeling like the neverending (paint) job, but it's something exciting to do which I hope will lead to better gloss and hardness than I got with the rustoleum. Plus, it's just fun to experiment to get the best, safe, inexpensive DIY paintjob. With all that rustoleum under there, I can be sure rust wont be an issue.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Exit1965]
#25926
09/30/06 08:07 PM
09/30/06 08:07 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Exit ... did your rustoleum ever harden properly? Did you ever find out what the problem was?
I followed your progress for about the first 40 pages or so, but by then it was about 4:00 AM, and I was getting pretty stupid.
But I've been thinking ... all of this effort you are putting in, this isn't just to get the car painted, this is making you an experienced painter. I'm sure this Dodge Dart won't be the only car you fix up, and now you can be increasingly confident of your ability to give it a great skin.
Thanks for posting all of your results and please let us know how the brightside works out. It's a big help to all of us.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25927
09/30/06 08:18 PM
09/30/06 08:18 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575 Canada
Marq
mopar addict
|
mopar addict
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575
Canada
|
Quote:
Marq: have you tried using a clear coat over the Brightside? Also ... do you have some more pics of your completely finished projects?
I am always pleased to share my last photo-session with the McLaren Mustang...
http://www.snpx.com/AugWaxedMcLaren
Now... on the topic of a 'clear coat'. I believe that it could be done.. BUT I don't think I would recommend it. And I would probably give the very same reason as Charger gives for not suggesting it for the Tremclad/Rustoleum.
It is a question of future repairs. Let us say you have a car that only has a highly polished and waxed paint job. If you get it scratched through some minor accident all you would have to do is lightly sand the area down, wipe it down with mineral spirits and then roll on some new paint over the repaired area. And the beauty of the polyurathane is that it is 'purposely designed' to chemically merge with the previous polyurathane paint.
Now... IF you had clear coated the Brightside paint job the task of doing a less obvious repair is much more difficult. You have to sand down the clear coated area, roll on the paint to the repaired area and then lay on a clear coat to that area. I really think that you would have problems getting the repair to blend in.
The car after compounding, polishing and waxing has 'the wet look'... so I can't see any reason to lay a clear coat skin over it.
But overall, I would say that once you have done a Brightside roll job, I don't think you would see a need for a clear coat. Polyurathane is already a highly glossy and shiny surface... and that is what Brightside is. In fact I could probably have STOPPED after the final layer of paint was put on and the shine from that final layer would have looked 100% acceptable. It had that wet shiny look.... ( as would a polyurathane paint job from a pro-paint shop. )
In all my readings of the marine and boating threads... I never once saw anyone saying that Brightside wasn't shiny or glossy enough OR that it could use a clear coat to boost its shine up.
YET we in the automotive scene do something that the boaters don't do... and that is we can take our paint jobs to a higher level of shine by doing the wet sanding, compounding, polishing and waxing.
.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Marq]
#25928
09/30/06 08:42 PM
09/30/06 08:42 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Ok ... so just to recap: You have found the Brightside is higher gloss than Tremclad? And more durable?
Thanks!!
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25930
09/30/06 10:13 PM
09/30/06 10:13 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379 Rancho Cordova, CA
Exit1965
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379
Rancho Cordova, CA
|
Montanaman, never found out what the problem was, but "problem" is subjective so it's in the eye of the beholder. My biggest beef was that I couldn't get it to harden enough not to be able to put a slice in it with my fingernail, even after about 2 months, when I rolled it on. I know that fingernails aren't likely to be doing that in the real world, but it just bugged me since it's so unlike a regular car finish. Spraying the rustoleum seemed to work well if the surface prep is good. I could still rip through the paint with my nail, but it took more effort and probably had to do with surface prep too. I ran into some weird results the last couple coats of rustoleum i put on the roof, it came out dull looking. And this was put on thicker than my normal coats since I was anxious to get all the red covered up. It came out without orange peel, but really dull. So I was/am at the point that I want to see if I can get something with better gloss, and with better hardness. Brightside is a better quality paint than rustoleum, with teflon and some UV additives for color retention, so I figured it's worth a shot since the other guys, and plenty of boaters, are having good luck with it. I'll post pics as I go..
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Exit1965]
#25931
10/01/06 02:48 AM
10/01/06 02:48 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Well, I have been doing lots of reading and research trying to find a good "orange" and in so doing have come across some info akin to what I think Marq discovered.
Whereas Marq looked to the marine world, I turned to the world of tractors, because I am after an Allis Chalmers orange.
In so doing they have YEARS of experience painting and restoring tractors.
Here is the skinny, no real surprise just more refinements/things to consider.
First, EXIT it appears that Rustoleum can get rock hard in curing after as much as six months according to some, however it still maintains some softness. Apparently this is intentional to help in instances that have been noted here, including charger, of things falling/banging/hitting the paint and not damaging it. However the soft properties would validate your discoveries of a nail or "slicing" type of motion being able to mar/chip the paint.
Another thing, and I don't remember if this has been discussed, but Rustoleum utilizes fish-oil in its mixture-- this is what they use as a rust-preventitive agent. Found a post as recently as Aug '06 where Rustoleum was called, and even though it is not listed on the cans, fish-oil is still used. Consequently from their experiences they recommend only using rustoleum over rustoleum... some have had short term success but many others have experienced adhesion issues/etc. At this point some of chuckthompsons (?) claims start to appear more plausible as the tractor guys have history with alkyd enamels and rustoleum.
In regards to all alkyd enamels, not all are created equal, and according to research if they are stored outside for long periods of time they will all fade/discolor (I am talking to those, like myself, whose vehicles NEVER see a garage). However, some last quite a long time.
Nevertheless there are some industrial/farm implement enamels that a hardener can be used and definitely increases gloss, fade resistance, and "slicing" resistance. There are also favourable reports of brushing on enamels with hardener.
Most recommend not doing it on sheet metal because of brush marks, although they do note that slow dry times (w/o hardener) allows for quite a bit of self-leveling. This encourages me to think that combined with application methods outlined here that rolling an enamel with hardener is possible.
In regards to hardeners though, most agree to utilize recommended hardeners. There has been some mention of Valspar hardener with Rustoleum with some positive results, but there seems to be a split on whether this is a good thing- those against say if rustoleum could use a hardener they would recommend and/or market one too.
Nevertheless if rustoleum isn't seen as great as an alternative there are a number of industrial/implement/tractor enamels out there with quite a range of colors that have recommended hardeners, and the price per qt/gallon is comparable to rustoleum still, with hardener running an extra $13-$18.
Most recommed staying away from Tractor Supply Company and Quality Farm & Fleet house brand enamels though, as they seem to be on the lower end of the quality scale.
Krylon Iron Guard was recommende often and seems to be a potential paint agent for us.
Lastly there does seem to be an agreed upon pecking-order for glossiness factor- alkyd enamels, acrylic enamels, acrylic urethanes, bc/cc.
However there is some consensus that an enamel with hardener has produced results equal to and superior to urethanes w/o hardener and approaching bc/cc shine characteristics.
Sorry for the long post, and I will probably remember/discover more, but I just wanted to try and contribute the information I have found to this collaborative effort Charger created since I have received so much from it already myself.
Some more food for thought...
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Wyl E Coyote]
#25932
10/01/06 07:26 AM
10/01/06 07:26 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
So what you're seeing that the paint itself is polishing well but you haven't levelled the surface of your paint. go ahead and use a harder rubber sanding block and try to stay off the edges of the block. what you can do while wetsanding is to have a squeegee of some sort and just swipe dry a section every now and then. what you should see with the use of a block is spots of dull (matte) finish and spots of shiny finish. so you're abrading away the bumps and brushmarks and NOT abrading the low spots (valleys) of the bumps.
This has been my problem, and I am going to try this solution. Is it possible to use a random-orbital 1/4-cut type sander to do the wetsanding? It has a hard enough pad on it to do the same thing I bet.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Wyl E Coyote]
#25934
10/01/06 09:29 AM
10/01/06 09:29 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379 Rancho Cordova, CA
Exit1965
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379
Rancho Cordova, CA
|
I just rolled on my first coat of brightside onto the driver's fender. I thinned it very very slightly with mineral spirits. At first, I got millions of bubbles, that could not be blown out. Going over the surface lightly with the roller knocked down most of them, then after I had put paint on the whole fender, I went back over everything semi-firmly to even things out. Dog hair fell into the paint on a few occasions and it was much tougher to get it out than using thin rustoleum. As the pic shows, there is lots of texture to the paint as it sits now. I'll wetsand it before going any further (if it dries with this texture). I would like to avoid orange peel altogether, but unless the paint is thinned more it seems like a challenge. I can try increasing the mineral spirits on my next run, but I'm afraid that will lead to more bubbles.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25935
10/01/06 12:20 PM
10/01/06 12:20 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575 Canada
Marq
mopar addict
|
mopar addict
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575
Canada
|
Quote:
Ok ... so just to recap: You have found the Brightside is higher gloss than Tremclad? And more durable?
Thanks!!
Yes and most likely yes.
Yes. Any polyurathane paint is going to be automatically more glossy and shiny than an enamel That is simply a matter of their chemical characteristics. In order to get the enamel based paint up to a high gloss and shiny appearance you MUST go through the wetsanding, compoundings, polishing and waxing stages. Just remember that you can take any rock off the street and if you polish it enough it can achieve a high state of gloss and shine.
Whereas the polyurathane paint is something like painting with liquid plastic. The carrier for a polyurathane are basically like liquid plastic when painted. Hence the reason it has quite a shine and gloss just by being painted on.
But as I have mentioned, you can take the polyurathane to a higher degree of shine and gloss by going through the wetsanding, compounding, polishing and waxing stages of the process.
As for the question about durability... it is my opinion that a polyurathane is more durable then an enamel. There is a chemical structure reason for this which would support that opinion... but the easiest way to explain it to someone so that they are comfortable with that opinion is this : Enamel based paints are one of the earliest known types of paints. Over the years there has been an evoloution to improve upon the chemical structure of enamel based paints. In the world of enamel based paints you get what you pay for. This means that there are high quality and expensive enamel paints that reflect the latest chemical compounds and there are cheap enamel paints that use the minimum standards in their chemical construction. In something that folks may be more familiar with... there is a wide array of tee shirts made in the world.. or blue jeans for that example. And yet we all know that cheap jeans and cheap tee shirts don't last long. Yet there are more expensive jeans and tee shirts that just can't be killed - they last forever. Then of course we have ultra-high priced jeans and tee- shirts where you are now paying for the name of the product rather than just the quality that went into the manufacture of the product.
Now... back to paint for a second. Polyurathanes were developed by the paint chemist to evolve the old enamels into something better. They were aiming for easier application, longer durability and any other improvements that would make the polyurathane paints a superior product to the enamels. So those chemist would have been comparing their polyurathane products against the best of the enamels. There would be little point trying to develop a new product to be marketed against the cheaper type enamels. So the evolution of the polyurathanes was to produce a superior product where the benefits to using that product could justify charging a little more money for the science and chemicals used to make it.
Sorry for the long explanation, but hopefully I have gotten the point across that polyurathane is just the natural evolution of paint and so you know that it has to have superior properties to the best of the enamels.
And naturally, the polyurathanes are not the be all and end all of the paint world... there are even more superior paints available out there that have been purposely designed to give even greater durability, color lock, temperature resistance, UV resistance etc. etc.
.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Marq]
#25936
10/01/06 12:25 PM
10/01/06 12:25 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
To Marq or others who have experience with auto painting--after my first coat of Brightside on my Jeep, it felt real smooth. After the second coat, I felt and saw these little, bitty specks that I figured were bubbles that I just overlooked and did not brush out. So, yesterday I did my third coat, and it seems that those specks are on there again. I am pretty confident that they are not bubbles. So, what are they? My guess would be dust particles, or something else from the ambient conditions? What do you guys think, and what do I do to avoid them? My garage really is not very clean, and wetting the floor is not doable. My guess is that I am stuck with them. If I do not sand until after the final coat (when I would use that ultra fine grit paste or whatever), will I be okay?
Thanks.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Exit1965]
#25937
10/01/06 12:39 PM
10/01/06 12:39 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575 Canada
Marq
mopar addict
|
mopar addict
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575
Canada
|
Quote:
As the pic shows, there is lots of texture to the paint as it sits now. I'll wetsand it before going any further (if it dries with this texture). I would like to avoid orange peel altogether, but unless the paint is thinned more it seems like a challenge. I can try increasing the mineral spirits on my next run, but I'm afraid that will lead to more bubbles.
Since that is the first layer of Brightside over your previous Rustoleum coats, I would process this layer as being the base layer that you are now going to lay subsequent layers on. So definitely I would aim for perfecting this layer with your wet sanding so that the next two layers of Brightside will not amplify any visual imperfections. If you nail this initial layer of Brightside correctly it will make the subequent layers visually much better and with less texture.
In a worst case scenario... the cutting of the Brightside with mineral spirit, instead of the Interlux 'brushing liquid' ( product 333 I believe ) may play some role in the texture problem.
On my car I only did one layer cutting with mineral spirit ( because I had run out of the Interlux brushing thinner ). But I don't recall running into a texture problem. Possibly the fact that I was placing that Brightside layer on top of a previous Brightside layer might be the reason I didn't have a problem.
IF you again have a texture problem when you go to add your second Brightside layer over the prepped Brightside layer, I might lean towards suggesting that you lay down an uncut coat of Brightside over a wetsanded Brightside layer. That would rule out any possible interference from the mineral spirit solvent and provide you with a thicker Brightside layer to perfect with wetsanding for the subsequent layers.
.
.
|
|
|
|
|