Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25899
09/28/06 07:30 PM
09/28/06 07:30 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The 'one roller' technique for the Brightside is the same as the technique for the Rustoleum. Once the paint has been applied to the panel, I keep moving the roller across the panel in the opposite direction to the way it was painted with just the weight of the roller. I do it for a minute or so and all of the bubbles go away.
The Gloss Black Metal Armour faded badly because of water damage to the paint. The Metal Armour is a different paint to the Rustoleum. It has similar properties but it is made to a different 'recipe' and it is made in a different country. Just because I experienced problems with the Metal Armour Gloss Black, that doesn't mean that the Rustoleum Gloss Black will do the same thing. I'm sure that 69charger has used the Rustoleum Gloss Black on a Honda without any problems at all.
Waxing a freshly applied coat of paint is not a good idea. The paint still needs to breath to allow the solvents in the paint to escape. If I had of waxed the Metal Armour straight away, I would have had more problems with the paint than it just fading.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25900
09/28/06 10:48 PM
09/28/06 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379 Rancho Cordova, CA
Exit1965
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379
Rancho Cordova, CA
|
Aussie, again you have layed down a sweet looking paint job!
When you say you rolled it straight, you mean with no thinner? What was the temperature when you were rolling?
Last edited by Exit1965; 09/28/06 10:49 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Exit1965]
#25901
09/29/06 01:31 AM
09/29/06 01:31 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hi Exit
I rolled the Brightside without any thinners at all. The temp for the first coat was about 18 C. When I did the second coat (yesterday) I did it outside in the sun and the temp was about 22 C. The 'outside' job went really well until a butterfly decided that the passenger's door was a great place to land, and that part of the paint got a little wrecked. Then I tried to fix it an it got a bit more wrecked....
Thank goodness for wet sanding, so I get the chance to fix these problems!!
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
#25902
09/29/06 04:14 AM
09/29/06 04:14 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
so how long should u wait after u polish before u wax??
also , whats the verdict on the brightside off ebay?? he has the color i want but am unsure if the paint is too old, or whatever.
does the brightside paint over bare metal or bondo, or is primer needed. that was one of the things that caught my eye about the rustoleum, which makes it just that much easier.
Last edited by menappi; 09/29/06 04:19 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: 69DartGT]
#25904
09/29/06 11:04 AM
09/29/06 11:04 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,220 toronto canada
69chargeryeehaa
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,220
toronto canada
|
aussie is rite, the 85 crx i painted about 13yrs ago was the first car i ever painted with this method when i was young and poor!!!! that paint was great for the next 3.5 yrs and lasted 3 winters while i was going to university in North Bay, Ontario, Canada, then i got rid of the car because it had 550,000 KMS on it . If you know where North Bay is, you'll know that there is retarded amounts of snow, salt, ect....it's about 4-5 hours north of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, there was times where i did'nt see my car for 2 weeks at a time because it was under 6ft of snow. I painted that car in 2 days at the cottage with stuff that was lying around that my dad was using, foam rollers and all, actually it was my now wife's idea to paint it this way, so really all the credit should go to her, well not all she actually helped me paint the car, she did all the nooks and crannys while i rollered the rest of the car. That crx was painted with no thinner, no sanding except for a quick "scuff" of the old dull, faded original paint, and it was waxed the next day. it never went dull, faded, or anything like that, but i did wax it twice a year. here's a pic once again: those are the only pics i have of the car, taken about 2 weeks after it was painted i got the windows tinted and put on some fog lights, the first pic was when i bought the car in the spring, and it was painted in the summer. i scanned the pics from photos. It did look awesome, about a 5 footer, not bad for 2 days work!!!
|
|
|
Profesional Results?
[Re: 69chargeryeehaa]
#25905
09/29/06 12:25 PM
09/29/06 12:25 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hello Mopar guys. I have been reading this board non-stop for several days now, and had to sign up to ask a burning question. Has anyone given the Rustoleum paint a few weeks to cure and then taken it to a profesional detailer? On this and other forums talking about this method, we always come down to the cut and polish stage. Lots of people are reporting decent results with the painting methods listed, but then when they get to the polishing, they are just grasping at straws. It seems to me that a profesional detailer would be able to extract the maximum performance out of this paint, and give us a good sample of what is possible with it. Obviously, we wouldn't even think of doing this to the 67 Camaro or 68 Impala, but would definately think about doing it on the old hunting truck (88 Suburban). I would love to see just what the potential of this method is in the hands of someone that knows how to get the best out of paint. I saw the results that admactanium got, and do wonder just how nice this paint can look. Sorry to jump into your Pentastar forum, but this has been a fascinating read....
|
|
|
Re: Profesional Results?
#25906
09/29/06 12:42 PM
09/29/06 12:42 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 36 Spokane, WA USA
Wyl E Coyote
member
|
member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 36
Spokane, WA USA
|
Forgive my intrustion here for I would like to answer that myself. The goal here from the very beginning to provide the best from $50 ( or something real close .... Now while I truly beieve your request is not beyond any one's thought of possibly doing and may already have been done. But for me its all about me and how it will turn out "me" doing work. Maybe you have a buddy that does this for a living and all it will cost you is a six pack.... of beer that is.... My interest is to what we can do that would not involve professionals. Now I need to shut up before I am kicked off the boarsd and get back to finishing my engine so I can get to start banging on the sheet metal get to the painting myself........
|
|
|
Re: Profesional Results?
[Re: Wyl E Coyote]
#25907
09/29/06 01:43 PM
09/29/06 01:43 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Coyote, No worries. I am just extremely curious about what the potential is. All efforts I have found so far involve a mild polish and wax, and I am wondering what can be had with a good cut and polish. I am not trying to drive the costs up, or take it out of the hands of DIYers. If more of us understood exactly what the max potential was, we would have something to strive for. It is very possible that people like Exit are looking for more than this method can provide, but I am wondering about that. Cars from the 60's did not have the greatest paint jobs from the factory, and duplicating the low gloss and sheen of these paint jobs today is very difficult. I am actually wondering if it is possible to re-create the look and feel of these paint jobs using inexpensive modern paints and techniques. If you can even get close, it will free up a ton of cash for people restoring the low value cars. As someone mentioned earlier, not everyone is restoring a 69 Daytona with a 426. (Forgive me if that isn't a high value Mopar, but it seems pretty rare and unusual to me). As I said before, it isn't a method I would consider on some of our rarer cars, but for a decent driver for my oldest (61 Buick) or my hunting truck, I would love to get reasonable results using an inexpensive method that my kids could do. The roller idea eliminates a lot of the health hazards of painting. I am just curious why no-one has taken one of their test pieces to a pro (or experienced buddy) to find out what is possible with this method. If it turns out you can get results better than a quicky single stage, this would definately put paintwork into the hands of many enthusiasts that lack the funding or opertunity to spray. Also, would like to hear more from Exit on what he is finding with the Canvass. It is strange that he was able to get a hard surface with some of his work, but not with the latest. Could the build-up be effecting this? If I recall, there is around 18 layers on this car now.
|
|
|
Re: Profesional Results?
#25909
09/29/06 03:01 PM
09/29/06 03:01 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379 Rancho Cordova, CA
Exit1965
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,379
Rancho Cordova, CA
|
Basically from what I've noticed, it boils down to this. If I rolled it, I can still dent it with my fingernail but it does not come all the way off.
On the stuff I sprayed with a HVLP gun, it is hard, and glossy, but if I push hard enough I can get it off with my nail, but it comes off so easy once I break the surface, that I think it's an adhesion issue. I did not spend much time prepping my door jambs. I probably should have hit them with 220 to give the paint some teeth, but I didn't. The paint I sprayed seems hard enough (or would probably be very hard given 4+ weeks of curing) but it was my fault I didn't prep the surface well enough for good adhesion.
Under my hood, I did hit with sandpaper (180 maybe) before using the rechargeable spray gun, and that paint is very hard and adhesion seems good.
Alas it's not scientific since many variables changed between application methods (roll, rechargeable spray can, HVLP + compressor), but I would venture a guess that good surface prep + sprayed rustoleum would turn out well and be hard and glossy enough for an old car.
Last edited by Exit1965; 09/29/06 03:05 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Profesional Results?
#25911
09/29/06 05:24 PM
09/29/06 05:24 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575 Canada
Marq
mopar addict
|
mopar addict
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575
Canada
|
Quote:
Hello Mopar guys. I have been reading this board non-stop for several days now, and had to sign up to ask a burning question. Has anyone given the Rustoleum paint a few weeks to cure and then taken it to a profesional detailer?
I actually gave consideration to letting a professional detailer do the final work to get the most out of my paint job.... BUT...
In the end I nixed the idea - because pro-detailers don't come cheap. And depending at what stage you are at when you hand him the car, the price can get quite out of hand... especially when they are charging by the hour.
I looked at the potential cost a pro-detailer might want and I figured that I would rather go and take $125 of that money and buy a Cable & Porter professional polisher. With that weapon in my arsenal I could do just about anything the detailer was going to do... with the difference being that my time cost nothing. And the added benefit is that I would learn what there is to learn about compounding, polishing and waxing - WHILE HAVING a lovely new tool in my collection for use on the other cars.
Now... I will agree that the one thing a pro-detailer can bring to the paint job is his EXPERIENCE. And in theory a genuine pro could max out the shine to its max.
But even in that case, I would tend to say that the painter should be the one who tries to max out his own shine. Then, if he should want to pass it along to a detailer once you've done your best... well the detailer might only have one or two hours of work that he can charge you for....
.
|
|
|
Re: Profesional Results?
[Re: Wyl E Coyote]
#25912
09/29/06 05:38 PM
09/29/06 05:38 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575 Canada
Marq
mopar addict
|
mopar addict
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575
Canada
|
Quote:
My interest is to what we can do that would not involve professionals.
Well... speaking for myself... I can assure you that I am about the most unprofessional body and paint man that you have ever met. Most of my learning has come from the school of hard knocks where I try something, blow it and then strip it down and begin again.
I am probably like most users who first read this thread. I am familiar with Tremclad and Rustoleum and I was a little leery about this. But after looking at the recipe that was given by Charger it did strike me that it was a feasible way to do it...
And do it I did for the first five or six coats. But like the skeptical people here I also was concerned that I did not want to go through a ton of work and subsequently have my paint go bad sometime down the road. The suspicion about the long term expectancy of the Tremclad Rustoleum nagged in the back of my head as I worked away with it. BUT the paint was going on and it was doing EXACTLY what Charger had promised... so I was sold on the TECHNIQUE because even my total lack of experience was not screwing things up.
So with further reading I learned that this TECHNIQUE is tried and true by the marine guys... and this is how most boat owners get fresh paint on their boats. That little bit of knowledge gave me more comfort with the idea of using MARINE paint... since I know that a polyurathane is going to outlive an enamel paint job.
But falling back to your question, I really believe that this TECHNIQUE, no matter which of the paints you use ( Tremclad/Rustoleum or Brightside )will work and give you quite reasonable or excellent results even if you are totally inexperienced. The key thing you need to have in your TOOLBOX IS PATIENCE...
a ) patience while preparing your car body for the paint... getting it as smooth as you can..
b ) patience during the rolling and wet sanding stage...
c ) patience while your friends look over your shoulder and laugh that you are using a roller to paint your car
d ) patience while you wet sand, compound, polish and wax your car.
So in this case patience and lots of time so that you are not rushing the job will be greater assets to a good final product than if you are Joe Professional bodyman.
But I do admit that if you happen to be Joe Professional Bodyman, than the odds are that the results you can tweak out of using this technique will probably be nothing short of amazing.
.
|
|
|
Re: Profesional Results?
[Re: Wyl E Coyote]
#25914
09/29/06 07:57 PM
09/29/06 07:57 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Coyote and Marq, I don't expect anyone to take a full car in, I am just surprised that no one has taken a small test piece in.
|
|
|
Re: Paint Type Summary Request
[Re: Exit1965]
#25916
09/30/06 04:06 AM
09/30/06 04:06 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Here are the results of two coats of Brightside Gloss Black, both rolled without any thinning of the paint. I'm going to give the paint a month to fully cure and then I'll start the final wetsanding and polishing. Only thirty days to go...... Oh, and the total cost of this paint job was $39.90 AUD. $37.50 for 1 litre of Brightside and 2 foam rollers @ $1.20 each. I love cheap!!!!!
Last edited by Aussie Driver; 09/30/06 04:18 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Profesional Results?
[Re: _Scott_]
#25917
09/30/06 04:46 AM
09/30/06 04:46 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29 McGregor Iowa USA
79asspin
member
|
member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
McGregor Iowa USA
|
If you look far enough back in the thread, one person with a lot of detailing experience did do a test on a motorcycle gas tank. He posted a few pics that showed results every bit as good as I would expect from a very good body shop, and much better than the run-of-the-mill body shop.
I was going to say the same thing. Beautiful high gloss orange.
79 Aspen, 12.74
98 Dakota R/T 15.08
98 Neon R/t
77 Volare wagon "Old Hickory"
71 roller paint Duster
87 D50 360 project
56 shivy step van, for sale
|
|
|
|
|