Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? #2241339
01/25/17 11:04 PM
01/25/17 11:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline OP
mopar
1964superstock  Offline OP
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Looking to see if anyone has successfully installed 295 65 15 Micky Thompson Radial Drag Tires in a 1962-1965 B-Body, with leaf springs in stock location? I am considering buying some and think they would fit my 1964 Plymouth Savoy as my current Hurst Racing Pie Crust rear tires are 11 inches cross section, and the MT tires are advertised with 12 inches cross section on a 8.5" rim. Also, any noticeable difference between the ET Street S/S tire and the ET Street R tire, besides the tread design? The ET Street tires is shown to weigh less than the ET Street S/S, but not sure if this is actually the case.

1964 Dodge 330 with 295 65 15 tires, and springs moved inward:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/1964-dodge-330-hemi-super-stock-clone/

1964 Plymouth Belvedere with 295 65 15 tires, and mini tubs:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/mopp-1111-1964-plymouth-belvedere-rocket-science/

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/mtt-3455

http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/drag-tires/et-street-s-s

http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/drag-tires/et-street-r

Screen Shot 2017-01-21 at 2.34.41 PM.pngScreen Shot 2017-01-21 at 2.34.28 PM.png
Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2241357
01/25/17 11:19 PM
01/25/17 11:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
How much clearance inside & outside do you have now? It's not just a wider tire, it's about 2" taller, so the widest part of the tire is farther away from the axle centerline, too.

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: BradH] #2241364
01/25/17 11:27 PM
01/25/17 11:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline OP
mopar
1964superstock  Offline OP
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Measured my car yesterday, and I have well over 1/2" clearance to the leaf spring, and toward the quarter panel wheel opening, so they would most likely fit, but would be snug. The extra inch of tire diameter should be ok, the Hurst Piecrust tires are over 29 inches tall. Only concern really is the clearance on the outside top section of the wheel tub. Looks like the tire may rub slightly with suspension travel upward. Just wondering if anyone else has attempted this before with success.

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2241369
01/25/17 11:31 PM
01/25/17 11:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,640
Oakland, MI
D
dizuster Offline
master
dizuster  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,640
Oakland, MI
I can tell you FOR SURE they wouldn't fit a 62. My 275/60 PRO required the spring to be pushed in to the side of the frae rail, and the wheel lip beat, and they BARELY fit.

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: dizuster] #2241378
01/25/17 11:42 PM
01/25/17 11:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,849
Wichita
G
GY3 Offline
master
GY3  Offline
master
G

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,849
Wichita
Originally Posted By dizuster
I can tell you FOR SURE they wouldn't fit a 62. My 275/60 PRO required the spring to be pushed in to the side of the frae rail, and the wheel lip beat, and they BARELY fit.


Hmm, my '63 required none of that with the same tire and I have room to spare on both sides!


'63 Dodge 330

11.19 @ 121 mph
Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs.

9.92 @ 135mph with a 350 shot of nitrous and 93 octane pump. 1.43 60 ft. 3,750 lbs.

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: GY3] #2241394
01/26/17 12:08 AM
01/26/17 12:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline OP
mopar
1964superstock  Offline OP
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Originally Posted By GY3
Originally Posted By dizuster
I can tell you FOR SURE they wouldn't fit a 62. My 275/60 PRO required the spring to be pushed in to the side of the frae rail, and the wheel lip beat, and they BARELY fit.


Hmm, my '63 required none of that with the same tire and I have room to spare on both sides!


I have had 275 60 15's on my '64 Plymouth before, and they fit easy, with plenty of room to spare. Just wondering about the next size up 295 65 15, if anyone has squeezed in these big tires with stock leaf spring location, stock axle width, and stock wheel tubs?

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2241423
01/26/17 12:43 AM
01/26/17 12:43 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,637
Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy Offline
I Live Here
fourgearsavoy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,637
Rittman Ohio
I have 275/65/15 on my car now and I have tried the Hoosier QuickTime 295/65/15 with 4" backspace to clear the leaf.It looks like it will fit inside just fine but I know if the suspension moves up the outer sidewall will hit the fender tub.
I haven't tried to beat the inner panel in yet but I would really like to run the 295's
Gus beer


64 Plymouth Savoy
493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow
5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box
Dana 60
Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2241541
01/26/17 10:56 AM
01/26/17 10:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,640
Oakland, MI
D
dizuster Offline
master
dizuster  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,640
Oakland, MI
Yeah I think guys lump 62-65 cars together, but I don't think the 1/4 panel shapes are near close enough to call tire fit the same.

I will say though that I'm talking about the PRO275 on a 10" rim, which was considerably wider then the regular 275 on an 8" rim.

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2241666
01/26/17 01:55 PM
01/26/17 01:55 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,954
Blairsden, CA
T
Triggerfish Offline
top fuel
Triggerfish  Offline
top fuel
T

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,954
Blairsden, CA
What backspacing?

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2241726
01/26/17 03:36 PM
01/26/17 03:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 181
Maryland
T
twayne24365 Offline
member
twayne24365  Offline
member
T

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 181
Maryland
dad's car has 275 pros and they fit nicely, 295 will be pushing it

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: twayne24365] #2241937
01/26/17 09:30 PM
01/26/17 09:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,637
Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy Offline
I Live Here
fourgearsavoy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,637
Rittman Ohio
The 295 will fit MY 64 Savoy with a 8" rim with 4" back space but it might rub when the body comes down. the Hoosier has a 12.3" max sidewall width with a 10" tread patch.
I will try to drive it down the road when the weather gets better around here.
Gus beer


64 Plymouth Savoy
493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow
5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box
Dana 60
Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: fourgearsavoy] #2242328
01/27/17 03:17 PM
01/27/17 03:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline OP
mopar
1964superstock  Offline OP
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Originally Posted By fourgearsavoy
The 295 will fit MY 64 Savoy with a 8" rim with 4" back space but it might rub when the body comes down. the Hoosier has a 12.3" max sidewall width with a 10" tread patch.
I will try to drive it down the road when the weather gets better around here.
Gus beer


Thanks for your reply. I would love to see some photos of the 295 65 15 Hoosiers on your '64 Savoy. Are you running leaf springs in stock location? Stock wheel tubs? Stock width rear axle? What is the width and back space on the rear wheels are your using?

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2242351
01/27/17 03:57 PM
01/27/17 03:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt Offline
master
1967dartgt  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
Originally Posted By 1964superstock
Originally Posted By fourgearsavoy
The 295 will fit MY 64 Savoy with a 8" rim with 4" back space but it might rub when the body comes down. the Hoosier has a 12.3" max sidewall width with a 10" tread patch.
I will try to drive it down the road when the weather gets better around here.
Gus beer


Thanks for your reply. I would love to see some photos of the 295 65 15 Hoosiers on your '64 Savoy. Are you running leaf springs in stock location? Stock wheel tubs? Stock width rear axle? What is the width and back space on the rear wheels are your using?


Hoosiers are 1/2 inch shorter then the Mickey's.


Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads
STR Chassis fabraction
Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2242550
01/27/17 10:58 PM
01/27/17 10:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,637
Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy Offline
I Live Here
fourgearsavoy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,637
Rittman Ohio
Originally Posted By 1964superstock
Originally Posted By fourgearsavoy
The 295 will fit MY 64 Savoy with a 8" rim with 4" back space but it might rub when the body comes down. the Hoosier has a 12.3" max sidewall width with a 10" tread patch.
I will try to drive it down the road when the weather gets better around here.
Gus beer


Thanks for your reply. I would love to see some photos of the 295 65 15 Hoosiers on your '64 Savoy. Are you running leaf springs in stock location? Stock wheel tubs? Stock width rear axle? What is the width and back space on the rear wheels are your using?

My springs are in the stock location,wheel tubs stock,rear axle is very close to a 67 B rear axle width.It was under a 67 Camaro with Moser axles shruggy It fit so I traded my 9" for it. I only have one tire and wheel combo so I could test fit it before I buy a pair of them. The rim is a Basset IMCA rim 8" wide with a 4" backspace.
I will mount the wheel and get a pic of it this weekend.
Gus beer


64 Plymouth Savoy
493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow
5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box
Dana 60
Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: twayne24365] #2243507
01/29/17 05:33 PM
01/29/17 05:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,921
WILKES-BARRE PA
J
Joesixpack Offline
I Live Here
Joesixpack  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,921
WILKES-BARRE PA
backspacing of
the rim is critical

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: Joesixpack] #2244206
01/30/17 07:39 PM
01/30/17 07:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,431
USA
S
SSAAHemiFan Offline
top fuel
SSAAHemiFan  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,431
USA
The ride height of your car and the stiffness of your suspension will be important - The inner wheel well curves inward above the wheel opening so it pinches the tire.

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: fourgearsavoy] #2246187
02/02/17 10:18 PM
02/02/17 10:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline OP
mopar
1964superstock  Offline OP
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Originally Posted By fourgearsavoy
Originally Posted By 1964superstock
Originally Posted By fourgearsavoy
The 295 will fit MY 64 Savoy with a 8" rim with 4" back space but it might rub when the body comes down. the Hoosier has a 12.3" max sidewall width with a 10" tread patch.
I will try to drive it down the road when the weather gets better around here.
Gus beer


Thanks for your reply. I would love to see some photos of the 295 65 15 Hoosiers on your '64 Savoy. Are you running leaf springs in stock location? Stock wheel tubs? Stock width rear axle? What is the width and back space on the rear wheels are your using?

My springs are in the stock location,wheel tubs stock,rear axle is very close to a 67 B rear axle width.It was under a 67 Camaro with Moser axles shruggy It fit so I traded my 9" for it. I only have one tire and wheel combo so I could test fit it before I buy a pair of them. The rim is a Basset IMCA rim 8" wide with a 4" backspace.
I will mount the wheel and get a pic of it this weekend.
Gus beer


Any photos to post of the 295s on your 1964 Savoy?

Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2247107
02/04/17 10:52 AM
02/04/17 10:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,468
N.Y.
sixpacksteve Offline
pro stock
sixpacksteve  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,468
N.Y.
hey Gus, this is something i've also been anticipating.
don't want to mini tub my car, so i'm looking for the widest wheel n tire i can put on car. 285/65/15 4 1/2 b.s. seems to be the combo that i've heard. im have adjustable shackles, so maybe more is possible.


Hell Hath No Fury Like Mine
Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: sixpacksteve] #2248058
02/05/17 09:02 PM
02/05/17 09:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,637
Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy Offline
I Live Here
fourgearsavoy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,637
Rittman Ohio
As soon as I get my rear end back together and my driveshaft is done I will get a pic of the tires on the car. Right now I'm getting the rear end re-tubed and trued up. Like I said already they BARELY fit and I'm pretty sure that if I didn't turn my shocks up to max they would rub the outside wheel tub.I think with a little massaging they would clear or if I would move the springs in and go with a 4 1/2" backspace wheel. I have 3/4" clearance to the spring with a 4" backspace 8" wheel.
Should have my junk back together in a few weeks and I will get a picture then.
Gus beer


64 Plymouth Savoy
493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow
5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box
Dana 60
Re: MT 295 65 15 fit in 62-65 B-Body? [Re: 1964superstock] #2262384
03/02/17 10:41 PM
03/02/17 10:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline OP
mopar
1964superstock  Offline OP
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Bump. Hey Gus, any photos yet?

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1