Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2440409
01/25/18 04:08 AM
01/25/18 04:08 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880 -
RSNOMO
Moparts Torchbearer
|
Moparts Torchbearer
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
|
|
|
|
Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: Twostick]
#2440623
01/25/18 04:48 PM
01/25/18 04:48 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,303 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,303
Bend,OR USA
|
Does he know the bore and stroke on that motor? Please find out and if he does please post it on here
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: Skeptic]
#2440656
01/25/18 05:58 PM
01/25/18 05:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,443 Northern N.J.
hemi_doug
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,443
Northern N.J.
|
So many Chebby guys have no clue that Chrysler built a 383 that wasn't a stroker. Actually, it kinda was...it began as a 361 I believe....
71 440-6 4spd & 69 Hemi 4spd
|
|
|
Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: hemi_doug]
#2440763
01/25/18 11:15 PM
01/25/18 11:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395 The Pale Blue Dot
Skeptic
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
|
So many Chebby guys have no clue that Chrysler built a 383 that wasn't a stroker. Actually, it kinda was...it began as a 361 I believe.... by that "logic" a 440 is a stroker motor too. Still isn't a [censored] Chevy.
|
|
|
Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2440769
01/25/18 11:31 PM
01/25/18 11:31 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,882 Pittsburgh,PA
RTSrunner
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,882
Pittsburgh,PA
|
Does he know the bore and stroke on that motor? Please find out and if he does please post it on here Cab,All RB's are 3.75" stroke stock.I had to look up the bore dimension,I found 4.03" for the RB 383 engine. RT
|
|
|
Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: Skeptic]
#2440792
01/26/18 12:09 AM
01/26/18 12:09 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,443 Northern N.J.
hemi_doug
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,443
Northern N.J.
|
So many Chebby guys have no clue that Chrysler built a 383 that wasn't a stroker. Actually, it kinda was...it began as a 361 I believe.... by that "logic" a 440 is a stroker motor too. Still isn't ag [censored] Chevy. Nope..not the same block...not being a Chevy aside.
71 440-6 4spd & 69 Hemi 4spd
|
|
|
Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: dodge turbo]
#2440870
01/26/18 03:47 AM
01/26/18 03:47 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,264 New York, USA
Chargerfan68
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,264
New York, USA
|
I also have a good friend with an all original 60 Windsor wagon with a 383 RB. 3.75 stroke
1.50 60Ft. , 10.75@ 127MPH Hauling 3900 LBS.
|
|
|
Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: hemi_doug]
#2440882
01/26/18 05:44 AM
01/26/18 05:44 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
So many Chebby guys have no clue that Chrysler built a 383 that wasn't a stroker. Actually, it kinda was...it began as a 361 I believe.... It actually began as a 350 then 361 to 383 and then 400. I had heard the RB 383 was built for two years but I am not 100% sure on that. Ron
|
|
|
Re: Best bang for the buck 440 heads and rods
[Re: 383man]
#2441154
01/26/18 07:38 PM
01/26/18 07:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,443 Northern N.J.
hemi_doug
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,443
Northern N.J.
|
So many Chebby guys have no clue that Chrysler built a 383 that wasn't a stroker. Actually, it kinda was...it began as a 361 I believe.... It actually began as a 350 then 361 to 383 and then 400. I had heard the RB 383 was built for two years but I am not 100% sure on that. Ron thank you sir, I stand corrected...
71 440-6 4spd & 69 Hemi 4spd
|
|
|
|
|