Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Flowkooler pump 440 [Re: RapidRobert] #2343842
07/26/17 06:06 PM
07/26/17 06:06 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,805
ky hills
thehemikid Offline
top fuel
thehemikid  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,805
ky hills
The lower rad hose got a stainless spring in short order.

Re: Flowkooler pump 440 [Re: RapidRobert] #2343846
07/26/17 06:11 PM
07/26/17 06:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
By increasing the diameter of the impeller you have increased the pressure that the pump can provide at any rpm. If the increased pressure causes the coolant to flow through flow restrictions, then flow will increase also. Both these additions increase the amount of power the pump eats.

R.

Re: Flowkooler pump 440 [Re: Jopar] #2344369
07/27/17 02:43 PM
07/27/17 02:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,543
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,543
Marion, South Carolina [><]
I've seen close to 10° temp drops using one of the pumps like a Flow Kooler w/ the plate on the impeller compared to a stock style pump. I've also used the Milodon version w/ success.

Keep in mind that these style of pumps require the use of a balance flow style thermostat like a Robert Shaw. They claim the added pressure from the pump will close a standard style thermostat.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon 340, no drivetrain, on blocks behind the barn
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: Flowkooler pump 440 [Re: Jopar] #2344548
07/27/17 09:54 PM
07/27/17 09:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 208
Middleboro,MA
J
Jopar Offline OP
enthusiast
Jopar  Offline OP
enthusiast
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 208
Middleboro,MA
UPDATE the car runs much cooler with the factory pump. I put about 100 miles since changing it and it definitely is more predictable from a cooling perspective. I did have to reduce the vacuum advance and overall timing to reduce ping. I conclude in my application that there is some trade offs but in the end I would rather not worry about it creeping into the 200 plus range. I would think I could get this to work by changing the thermostat, but I feel That electric fans are a better investment. The setup today fluctuates between 175-190 and feel I can level it out around 195 with airflow. I'm waiting for a hot day to do more experimenting.

Re: Flowkooler pump 440 [Re: Jopar] #2344552
07/27/17 09:59 PM
07/27/17 09:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 208
Middleboro,MA
J
Jopar Offline OP
enthusiast
Jopar  Offline OP
enthusiast
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 208
Middleboro,MA
FYI the application has a balance flow Milodon thermostat maybe it needs the Robert Shaw. This could be the root of the issue.

Re: Flowkooler pump 440 [Re: Jopar] #2344554
07/27/17 10:03 PM
07/27/17 10:03 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
you can toss the stat for a day as the slow(er) warmup wont hurt you at all for (1) day & it will tell you if the stat is involved in the issue.


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1